VNAO T-45 Goshawk

[hreich]

Thank you deeleyer !!!

 

 

[flyingcyrus]

3 hours ago, rafalito1 said:

I think you are confused about AOA and Attitude.

Angle of attack (AOA) is the angle between an aircraft's wing's chord line and the relative wind.

Aircraft attitude is the orientation of an aircraft in relation to the Earth's horizon, specifically how the nose and wings are positioned in space.

8º AOA for straight and level flight seems like a correct indication. You need some lift in your wings to fly.

If I remember correctly Velocity Vector doesn't work below a certain speed (50kt), and I suppose AOA indicator doesn't work without wind flow.

No I'm not 
8° AOA would be OK for straight and level flight with a relatively slow speed, not at almost 400kt and low altitude. The thing is, as I said in my previous post (and confirmed by Nibbylot), that the AOA of the T-45 (and some other military birds) indicates "units" and not degrees, therfore not displaying the "classical" angle. This is what I was confused about.

Edited November 11 by flyingcyrus

[rafalito1]

hace 4 horas, flyingcyrus dijo:

No I'm not 
8° AOA would be OK for straight and level flight with a relatively slow speed, not at almost 400kt and low altitude. The thing is, as I said in my previous post (and confirmed by Nibbylot), that the AOA of the T-45 (and some other military birds) indicates "units" and not degrees, therfore not displaying the "classical" angle. This is what I was confused about.

First time that I know that AOA "units" are not degrees.
So I've looked into the T-45's NATOPS Manual.

And yes,  you seem to be right. It say only "units", not degrees.

Page I-2-90:
2.21.2 AOA Controls and Indicators.
2.21.2.1 AOA Indicator. The AOA indicator
functions throughout the entire flight regime to
display AOA information, see Figure 2-38. The
indicator registers units of AOA to the relative
airstream, from 0 to 30 units. An OFF flag is
visible if electrical power is lost. The indicator is
set with the optimum unit setting at the 3 o'clock
position. Both cockpit AOA indicators independently
receive their input from the AOA probe.

[nibbylot]

42 minutes ago, rafalito1 said:

First time that I know that AOA "units" are not degrees.
So I've looked into the T-45's NATOPS Manual.

And yes,  you seem to be right. It say only "units", not degrees.

Page I-2-90:
2.21.2 AOA Controls and Indicators.
2.21.2.1 AOA Indicator. The AOA indicator
functions throughout the entire flight regime to
display AOA information, see Figure 2-38. The
indicator registers units of AOA to the relative
airstream, from 0 to 30 units. An OFF flag is
visible if electrical power is lost. The indicator is
set with the optimum unit setting at the 3 o'clock
position. Both cockpit AOA indicators independently
receive their input from the AOA probe.

This is also not unique to the T-45. I believe almost all Navy jets in DCS (A-4, F-14, F-18, F-4) use “Units” instead of “degrees” for AoA.

[Holbeach]

Record of my first Carrier trap with the T45..

Although I posted on the 2nd page, I'd forgotten about this mod until this morning. I didn't realise how advanced it was.

Downloaded v 1.2. Here is my second attempt at a landing on a Carrier. 1st attempt, the hook bounced the wires, but the 2nd attempt worked. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I spent a lot of time in the Hawk. This is far better than I expected..

Edit: I found out that the parking brake is on by default, so a key needs to be assigned. This increased the T/O speed with full tanks to 123kt.

..

Edited November 13 by Holbeach

[Holbeach]

On 9/18/2025 at 8:40 PM, Rudel_chw said:

 

I enjoy the T-45 too, but the Hawk had the advantage that it could carry real weapons, including a Gun, while the Goshawk only has practice weapons and a "simulated" gun.

The Hawk had a gun but it was never lined up with the sights and the devs were never able to cure it.

Work rounds were in order.

..

[Holbeach]

The Corsair and Goshawk have rekindled my interest in DCS, with Carrier ops. which I have never considered before. (Except Harrier).

Without the benefit of a manual, virtual or otherwise, I have a question or 2.

Is there a landing weight limit? I'm at 60% fuel.

Edit: Max landing weight is 13,360lb. (I now have a manual).

I'm going for a 125kt approach, as it feels right. IAS is showing this on the tab. This shows as 141kt IAS on the HUD. 120kt/135kt at the deck edge. This can't be right. 

EDIT: I see what's happening here. The HUD is adding the wind speed to the IAS. (Maybe this is known bug)

If you remove wind speed it reads correct IAS/TAS, which is what you want. E.g. 125 on the approach instead of 141, which we have here.

17units is onspeed.

 

 

 

So far I havn't touched the Speedbrake. Is it usual to use it on approach?

Edit: I find it best to use it, so that's what I'll do from now on.

2nd Edit: Use the speedbrake is normal operation from crosswind. close it at touchdown and full throttle.

1st wire. Just right. 

This mod ie exceptional!

It's close to the Skyhawk in looks and size, which was used on this Colossus Class ship by Argentina.

T/O is good at any weight, even without wind. Ship speed is 24kt.

Lovin it.

 

..

Edited Monday at 08:53 AM by Holbeach

[LCO489]

@nibbylot please, do you have some info on how much throttle will brakes hold on a takeoff? I'm working on a new version of my suspension mod and i want to adjust that too.

 

Edit: just uploaded a new version of my suspension mod for version 1.2. Any feedback is welcome.

https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3317885/ 

Edited November 16 by LCO489

[Lordfacker84]

excuse me , i can't find keybind for the paddle switch ...where can i find it?

[Minsky]

17 minutes ago, Lordfacker84 said:

excuse me , i can't find keybind for the paddle switch ...where can i find it?

It doesn't seem to be implemented, and the NWS cannot be disengaged.

[E69_DaniV]

On 11/14/2025 at 7:26 PM, LCO489 said:

@nibbylot please, do you have some info on how much throttle will brakes hold on a takeoff? I'm working on a new version of my suspension mod and i want to adjust that too.

 

Edit: just uploaded a new version of my suspension mod for version 1.2. Any feedback is welcome.

https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3317885/ 

Thank you very much!!. Will test it. Keep the good work on!

[Lordfacker84]

12 hours ago, Minsky said:

It doesn't seem to be implemented, and the NWS cannot be disengaged.

Ah ok thanks very much

[Holbeach]

 

 

 

 

 

..

[RustBelt]

On 11/14/2025 at 1:08 PM, Holbeach said:

The Corsair and Goshawk have rekindled my interest in DCS, with Carrier ops. which I have never considered before. (Except Harrier).

Without the benefit of a manual, virtual or otherwise, I have a question or 2.

Is there a landing weight limit? I'm at 60% fuel.

Edit: Max landing weight is 13,360lb.

I'm going for a 125kt approach, as it feels right. IAS is showing this on the tab. This shows as 141kt IAS on the HUD. 120kt/135kt at the deck edge. This can't be right. 

EDIT: I see what's happening here. The HUD is adding the wind speed to the IAS. (Maybe this is known bug)

If you remove wind speed it reads correct IAS/TAS, which is what you want. E.g. 125 on the approach instead of 141, which we have here.

 

I don't think it's a Known Bug Perhaps it is on the Discord. It certainly shouldn't do that.

[Holbeach]

On 11/23/2025 at 5:40 AM, RustBelt said:

I don't think it's a Known Bug Perhaps it is on the Discord. It certainly shouldn't do that.

I don't have Discord, but I tried some other jets and Harrier was a bit under, F 15e and Sabre, were about right.

Onspeed at 17 units seems OK, so I will stick with that.

Having a lot of fun with Carrier landings despite this bug.

118 kt shown here, is 130 kt on the HUD. with 12 kt headwind at 33'.

The difference starts at around 600' and increases as the alt. decreases

 

 

 

..

Edited yesterday at 07:38 AM by Holbeach

[Soulfreak]

Am 14.5.2023 um 19:55 schrieb flyingscotsman:

you might have to select a parking slot on the carrier and use autostart,

Maybe I´m blind, but is in Version 1.02 no Autostart & Autostop option?

[flyingscotsman]

14 hours ago, CarloVecchi said:

Maybe I´m blind, but is in Version 1.02 no Autostart & Autostop option?

Hi CaroVecchi,

                           Apologies for any misunderstanding, that's 2 years back, and in the post I stated that I 'wasn't sure' if this was an option, was given as a suggestion to a question.

Now, years later, I would not expect a MOD to have autostart etc. We all keep learning.

[Soulfreak]

vor 10 Stunden schrieb flyingscotsman:

Hi CaroVecchi,

                           Apologies for any misunderstanding, that's 2 years back, and in the post I stated that I 'wasn't sure' if this was an option, was given as a suggestion to a question.

Now, years later, I would not expect a MOD to have autostart etc. We all keep learning.

Np mate.

So there is no Autostart & stop.

Hope this will be added in the future.

Would be a nice addition for lazy guys like me.