pepin1234 Posted October 16, 2019 Share Posted October 16, 2019 Yak-38 combat value is close to L-39C(Not even ZA). One of the worst military aircraft ever created in history. I was thinking the same, until I released this aircraft was a disembark support task only, in a soviet tactic only. Then was really useful in this case. About what said Silver Dragon that sound totally BS. This aircraft is a museum piece and a 3rd generation aircraft. Will be a good module anyways [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Кош Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 A Su-7b would be of much bigger use as it was a workhorse in the 60s. Yak? Learn to fly it without any assists, get assured that it is really harder to fly than a Harrier, never fly it again. Then again, we really need those early airfield vehicles based on Gaz-69, Gaz-51, Gaz-63 and ZIL-157. i5-10600k/32GB 3600/SSD NVME/1060gtx 6gb/1920x1200'24/VPC T-50 Saitek X-52 throttle Saitek combat rudder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harlikwin Posted October 17, 2019 Share Posted October 17, 2019 A Su-7b would be of much bigger use as it was a workhorse in the 60s. Yak? Learn to fly it without any assists, get assured that it is really harder to fly than a Harrier, never fly it again. Then again, we really need those early airfield vehicles based on Gaz-69, Gaz-51, Gaz-63 and ZIL-157. I just want the "auto-eject" feature on the yak... That would be hillarious, flying out of limits, boom bye! :megalol: And I totally agree that Su-7 or Su-17/22 would be a much better/more desirable module. New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1) Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velik Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 I just want the "auto-eject" feature on the yak... That would be hillarious, flying out of limits, boom bye! :megalol: Argeed. + ZB-500 napalm tanks + engine stall when you fire GSh-23 mmm sounds really cool. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harlikwin Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 Argeed. + ZB-500 napalm tanks + engine stall when you fire GSh-23 mmm sounds really cool. Maybe someone can make an auto eject mod for the L39, exceed so much AOA and bang! :megalol: New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1) Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AeriaGloria Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 This made me do some research. It ejected you slightly left to avoid the bridge! Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harlikwin Posted October 22, 2019 Share Posted October 22, 2019 This made me do some research. It ejected you slightly left to avoid the bridge! LOFL. Good human engineering.... It does make me want to research if one can land a l39 on something like the tarawa. New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1) Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upyr1 Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 Can we get the A-3, B-66 and thud? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leviathan667 Posted June 25, 2022 Share Posted June 25, 2022 The images in post #2 aren't available anymore. But my guess, a 55-65 asset pack, aircraft wise would be ALOT of work. E.g. it would include (excluding current projected modules for that era, helicopters and trainers): USAF: F-84, -94, -100, -101, -102, -104, -105, -106, Skyraider, Neptune, EC-121, P-3 USN: F-2H, -3H, -9F, -11F, A-3, F-4D Skyray, A-4 Skyhawk French air force: Ouragan, Mystère I, IV, SMB2, Vautour, Fouga Magister, Mirage IVP French Navy : Étendard IV, Br .1050 Alizé RAF: Meteor, Vampire, Venom, Hunter, Attacker, Javelin, Canberra, Lightning, Shackleton, Victor, Vulcan, Valiant, Swift, RN: Sea Vixen, Buccaneer, Scimitar, Sea Venom, Sea Hawk, Gannet Soviet air force: Su-7, -9, MiG-21 F13, Yak-28, Tu-16, -126, Il-20 Compromises would have to be made... 2 Wishlist: Tornado ADV/IDS, Blackburn Buccaneer, Super Mystère B2, Saab J 35 Draken, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upyr1 Posted July 12, 2022 Share Posted July 12, 2022 On 10/17/2019 at 1:52 PM, Harlikwin said: I just want the "auto-eject" feature on the yak... That would be hillarious, flying out of limits, boom bye! And I totally agree that Su-7 or Su-17/22 would be a much better/more desirable module. Turn you into jester Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upyr1 Posted July 12, 2022 Share Posted July 12, 2022 On 10/17/2019 at 4:07 AM, Кош said: A Su-7b would be of much bigger use as it was a workhorse in the 60s. Yak? Learn to fly it without any assists, get assured that it is really harder to fly than a Harrier, never fly it again. Then again, we really need those early airfield vehicles based on Gaz-69, Gaz-51, Gaz-63 and ZIL-157. The su-7 and F-105 would be a great module pairing 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts