FINISTRUS Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 (edited) Would you like to see the MiG-29 module of the DCS level?:pilotfly: Edited December 17, 2019 by FINIST(RUS) [sIGPIC]https://vk.com/vfa133[/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aluminum Donkey Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 Would you like to see the MiG-29 module of the DCS level?:pilotfly: I'm sure everyone would love the MiG-29, Su-27, and F-15 released as a full-fidelity module. Probably ain't gonna happen. Government and all that :) AD Kit: B550 Aorus Elite AX V2, Ryzen 7 5800X w/ Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE, 2 x 16GB Kingston Fury DDR4 @3600MHz C16, Gigabyte RTX 3070 Windforce 8GB, EVGA SuperNova 750 G2 PSU, HP Omen 32" 2560x1440, Thrustmaster Cougar HOTAS fitted with Leo Bodnar's BU0836A controller. --Flying is the art of throwing yourself at the ground, and having all the rules and regulations get in the way! If man was meant to fly, he would have been born with a lot more money! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FINISTRUS Posted December 17, 2019 Author Share Posted December 17, 2019 I'm sure everyone would love the MiG-29, Su-27, and F-15 released as a full-fidelity module. Probably ain't gonna happen. Government and all that :) AD I think if we express interest, it will bring a positive result.:smilewink: [sIGPIC]https://vk.com/vfa133[/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeMonteur Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 I think if we express interest, it will bring a positive result.:smilewink: They already ststed that they cannot produce any Russian made full fidelity module due government until they are located in Russia. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 132nd vWing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FINISTRUS Posted December 17, 2019 Author Share Posted December 17, 2019 They already ststed that they cannot produce any Russian made full fidelity module due government until they are located in Russia. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk This does not interfere with the export version. There should not be any problems with this version. [sIGPIC]https://vk.com/vfa133[/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harzach Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 This does not interfere with the export version. There should not be any problems with this version. The problem isn't with being allowed to sell it, it's with being allowed access to the necessary data to simulate the systems/flight model/etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FINISTRUS Posted December 17, 2019 Author Share Posted December 17, 2019 The problem isn't with being allowed to sell it, it's with being allowed access to the necessary data to simulate the systems/flight model/etc. However, representatives replied that the MiG is simply not in the plans. It seems to me it is not a matter of secrecy, but of money. Representatives cannot answer what documents they have problems with [sIGPIC]https://vk.com/vfa133[/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DerFangzahn Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 However, representatives replied that the MiG is simply not in the plans. It seems to me it is not a matter of secrecy, but of money. Representatives cannot answer what documents they have problems with We are talking about military secrets here. So if ED does something which the russian government does not like ED closes its doors faster than you can count to 3. So as long as there is no bulletproof agreement with rus gov ED will keep silent. Easy as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bies Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 When it comes to MiG-29 ED can't do that but 3rd party are free to go. I.e. Heatblur could make MiG-29A. F-15C - i wouldn't be surprised if ED would make it. FM and external model are more or less ready and avionics are very similar to McDonell Hornet without AG but bigger radar. MiG-29 would be great, full fidelity RedFor, huge amount of states using it, big potential market. I had many books about Fulcrum. Fantastic plane for late cold war or Desert Storm scenarios. Su-27 also, the whole DCS was created as Su-27 simulator - "Su-27 Flanker" 1995. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FINISTRUS Posted December 17, 2019 Author Share Posted December 17, 2019 We are talking about military secrets here. So if ED does something which the russian government does not like ED closes its doors faster than you can count to 3. So as long as there is no bulletproof agreement with rus gov ED will keep silent. Easy as that. Do you have information confirming this?:) [sIGPIC]https://vk.com/vfa133[/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jester986 Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 ED has said they will not do a full fidelity Russian jet. But that a third party would be welcome to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kontiuka Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 F-15C - i wouldn't be surprised if ED would make it. FM and external model are more or less ready and avionics are very similar to McDonell Hornet without AG but bigger radar.I'm sure F-15C would sell well but a lack of A/G capability I think would turn some people away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bies Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 I'm sure F-15C would sell well but a lack of A/G capability I think would turn some people away. Most airplanes in history were specialised fighters, cas, strike, bombers etc., F/A-18 and F-16 are rather exceptions than the rule. And even expensive mighty air superiority big daddy "not a single pound for air to ground" F-15 had some A/G capability after all using dumb bombs because of pressure from above. Never used this capabilities irl though. MiG-29 and Su-27 had only the most basic A/G capabilities also, does it really mean they are less interesting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ironhand Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 I'm sure F-15C would sell well but a lack of A/G capability I think would turn some people away. :) Something will always keep some people from buying. And, yes, I wish some team would pick up the torch and produce a MiG-29 or Su-27. YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU1...CR6IZ7crfdZxDg _____ Win 11 Pro x64, Asrock Z790 Steel Legend MoBo, Intel i7-13700K, MSI RKT 4070 Super 12GB, Corsair Dominator DDR5 RAM 32GB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow KT Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 Chizh has said in the russian forums that they could make a MiG-29 if they wanted, but there are just more feasible module to create 'Shadow' Everybody gotta be offended and take it personally now-a-days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FINISTRUS Posted December 17, 2019 Author Share Posted December 17, 2019 Chizh has said in the russian forums that they could make a MiG-29 if they wanted, but there are just more feasible module to create I think the problem is money. It would be great if not ED so other developers will make MiG:vertag: [sIGPIC]https://vk.com/vfa133[/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jester2138 Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 I'm sure F-15C would sell well but a lack of A/G capability I think would turn some people away. That's exactly why I would buy it... Not a Pound for Air to Ground Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kev2go Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 (edited) When it comes to MiG-29 ED can't do that but 3rd party are free to go. I.e. Heatblur could make MiG-29A. F-15C - i wouldn't be surprised if ED would make it. FM and external model are more or less ready and avionics are very similar to McDonell Hornet without AG but bigger radar. MiG-29 would be great, full fidelity RedFor, huge amount of states using it, big potential market. I had many books about Fulcrum. Fantastic plane for late cold war or Desert Storm scenarios. Su-27 also, the whole DCS was created as Su-27 simulator - "Su-27 Flanker" 1995. Actually that is one feature missing from an Air superiority eagle . The manual makes references and various other documentation not directly related to aircraft operation directly cites AN/APG63 A/G radar modes such as : b "Air to ground ranging, pulse ground mapping" and post APG63's PSP upgrade included "Doppler beam sharpening ground mapping" which also has GMT ( ground moving target) mode. Im hoping that even if full fidelity F15C doesn't happen FC3 would then at least get an update to include A/G functionality when ED finally works out their A/G technology needed for the Hornet and other aircraft like the Viper. Edited December 18, 2019 by Kev2go Build: Windows 10 64 bit Pro Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD, WD 1TB HDD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kev2go Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 (edited) I'm sure F-15C would sell well but a lack of A/G capability I think would turn some people away. Not unless ED include it ;) After all the capbilty to utilize A/G was alwasy there, just laying dormant..... at least only in USAF operated eagles. Isreali operated eagles on the other hand used the F15 to its fullest capabilities on a few occasions If you can find i suggest a lookie on some F15A/C manuals. CCIP/ CCRIP bombing modes operation is documented. MK80 series bomb family compatible, and even electro optical GBu8 bomb is an option. APG63 even has some A/G functionality which includes A/G ranging, Pulse mapping, and post PSP upgrade includes improved Doppler beam sharpening mode for better ( or rather finally meaningfull) map resolution as well as GMTI modes to detect ground moving vehicles. Edited December 18, 2019 by Kev2go Build: Windows 10 64 bit Pro Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD, WD 1TB HDD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FINISTRUS Posted December 18, 2019 Author Share Posted December 18, 2019 https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3676975&postcount=93 what would you understand about the situation [sIGPIC]https://vk.com/vfa133[/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lester Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 And this is the reply from Chizh: ED company did make request to the Sukhoi Design Bureau he also added that: No details will be provided Все написанное выше является моим оценочным суждением Everything written above reflects my personal opinion Занимаюсь "активной пропагандой Американцев на данном форуме" © Flanker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kev2go Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3676975&postcount=93 what would you understand about the situation Interesting thanks for sharing. I had not seen this one before Build: Windows 10 64 bit Pro Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD, WD 1TB HDD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonne Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 Now thats some very contrary information to what we had until now. In what context was that post made? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FINISTRUS Posted December 18, 2019 Author Share Posted December 18, 2019 В текущей концепции легкого модуля уровня ГС он самодостаточен. На создание тяжелого модуля со всеми системами решения пока нет. About MiG-29 [sIGPIC]https://vk.com/vfa133[/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tugais Posted December 18, 2019 Share Posted December 18, 2019 Now thats some very contrary information to what we had until now. In what context was that post made? It occurred to me that the Russian section of this forum is much more informative than what we have on the english speaking section. Not the first time I see this kind of discrepancy between the english and russian forums. I'd love that Eagle Dynamics would hire or task someone fluent in english and russian to bring over the informations provided to the Russian community. 3rd Wing | 55th Black Alligators * BA-33 Εις ανηρ ουδεις ανηρ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts