Northstar98 Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 (edited) On 5/28/2021 at 10:30 PM, renhanxue said: IIRC the JA 37 flight manual has a 1981 publish date so with the standard 40 year declassification term it should in principle be possible to get it declassified now without too much trouble. Better be prepared to wait a year or so for the national archives to handle the request though. I'm just going off from memory, though this was a few years back. Even so the AJ 37 should be a much easier variant to do than the JA 37 (even if I'd love to see it). Edited July 3, 2022 by Northstar98 2 Modules I own: F-14A/B, Mi-24P, AV-8B N/A, AJS 37, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk. Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas. System: GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV. Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronMike Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 (edited) Just manage your expectations please, guys. Currently I would say the answer to expect will rather be "no". At the same time we don't want to just squash such suggestions and think about them thoroughly (or keep them on the back log for the future etc). In general it is a great suggestion. But we currently have no such plans and a very busy schedule with everything else which is already in the works. So, to put it carefully - it is unlikely at this moment. Thank you for your kind understanding. Edited May 29, 2021 by IronMike 4 Heatblur Simulations Please feel free to contact me anytime, either via PM here, on the forums, or via email through the contact form on our homepage. http://www.heatblur.com/ https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLTeo Posted May 29, 2021 Share Posted May 29, 2021 What about just implementing a ME option to disable TERNAV by default (or maybe have it not work at all)? Weapon loadouts can be limited, the recon mods are pretty minor, and purists can input the mission plan through the CK if they so desire. It's not ideal, but it's close enough and would require significantly less effort. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronMike Posted June 1, 2021 Share Posted June 1, 2021 On 5/29/2021 at 7:25 PM, TLTeo said: What about just implementing a ME option to disable TERNAV by default (or maybe have it not work at all)? Weapon loadouts can be limited, the recon mods are pretty minor, and purists can input the mission plan through the CK if they so desire. It's not ideal, but it's close enough and would require significantly less effort. That is a good idea, we'll think about it. Thanks! 9 2 Heatblur Simulations Please feel free to contact me anytime, either via PM here, on the forums, or via email through the contact form on our homepage. http://www.heatblur.com/ https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kseremak Posted June 4, 2021 Share Posted June 4, 2021 Legacy Viggen proper for Cold War servers would be great, it's Viggen's natural enviroment anyway. And the changes would be minor. BTW I love how Heatblur maintains relations with community, always classy, understanding, honest and respectfull, with such attitude they have a bright future ahead. My type of company! 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spirale Posted June 5, 2021 Share Posted June 5, 2021 (edited) " BTW I love how Heatblur maintains relations with community, always classy, understanding, honest and respectfull, with such attitude they have a bright future ahead. My type of company!" +1000 Edited June 5, 2021 by Spirale 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northstar98 Posted June 11, 2021 Share Posted June 11, 2021 (edited) Just to further ask, is the RB 15F Mk 1 definitely off the table? AFAIK (which isn't much, I'm going off of the CMANO database here), RB 15F Mk. I was on the AJ 37 from 1990 onwards (with everything else remaining the same), is that correct? If so, it would be possible to do an AJ 37 suitable for the 70s, 80s and 90s, using historical mode to restrict weapons - which is the only change I can find thus far. EDIT: Looking out the loadout diagram provided by Skyracer, it would seem like a no. Edited July 3, 2022 by Northstar98 formatting 1 Modules I own: F-14A/B, Mi-24P, AV-8B N/A, AJS 37, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk. Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas. System: GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV. Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frosen Posted June 11, 2021 Share Posted June 11, 2021 4 hours ago, Northstar98 said: Just to further ask, is the RB 15F Mk. I definitely off the table? AFAIK (which isn't much, I'm going off of the CMANO database here), RB 15F Mk. I was on the AJ 37 from 1990 onwards (with everything else remaining the same), is that correct? If so, it would be possible to do an AJ 37 suitable for the 70s, 80s and 90s, using historical mode to restrict weapons - which is the only change I can find thus far. EDIT: Looking out the loadout diagram provided by Skyracer, it would seem like a no. Yes, RB 15 compatibility came with the AJS mod early 90s. Thus, AJ 37 regardless of era could not carry RB 15. 1 4 i7-7700K @ 4.9 GHz | Gigabyte Aorus Geforce GTX 1080 Ti | 32 GB DDR4 Corsair Vengeance @ 2400 MHz (2800 OC) | Asus Strix Z270E Gaming | Samsung 970 EVO M.2 SSD 1 TB | Samsung 960 EVO M.2 SSD 500 GB | WD NAS Red 2TB SATA3 | Corsair Cooling Hydro Series H80i v2 | Thrustmaster Hotas Warthog | Saitek PRO rudder pedals | Valve Index Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDontLikeBigbrother Posted June 13, 2021 Share Posted June 13, 2021 how to turn a butterfly to a caterpillar? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spirale Posted June 14, 2021 Share Posted June 14, 2021 +1.... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spacemishka Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 (edited) Why i cant have the RB74 at the outer pylons? Edited July 13, 2021 by spacemishka Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kseremak Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 On 7/13/2021 at 9:40 AM, spacemishka said: Why i cant have the RB74 at the outer pylons? It was due to outer pylons having different, simpler construction not able to support Rb-74 seeker cooling system. But this was the case in all AJ/AJS-37. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts