Jump to content

DCS World Patch Notes Discussion Thread


BIGNEWY

Recommended Posts

Hmm, at the end there was a phase called "removing obsolete files" and I got a repeating error message:

 

00819.159 ERROR: Can't delete E:\DCS World\CoreMods/aircraft/Christen Eagle II/bin/CE2_AI.dll: (5) Access is denied.
00819.159 INFO : Sleeping for 0.100000 seconds...
00819.262 ERROR: Can't delete E:\DCS World\CoreMods/aircraft/Christen Eagle II/bin/CE2_AI.dll: (5) Access is denied.
00866.252 STATUS: Got RETRY when asked to retry: Can't delete E:\DCS World\CoreMods/aircraft/Christen Eagle II/bin/CE2_AI.dll: (5) Access is denied.
00866.252 ERROR: Can't delete E:\DCS World\CoreMods/aircraft/Christen Eagle II/bin/CE2_AI.dll: (5) Access is denied.
00867.047 STATUS: Got RETRY when asked to retry: Can't delete E:\DCS World\CoreMods/aircraft/Christen Eagle II/bin/CE2_AI.dll: (5) Access is denied.
00867.047 ERROR: Can't delete E:\DCS World\CoreMods/aircraft/Christen Eagle II/bin/CE2_AI.dll: (5) Access is denied.
00870.520 STATUS: Got CANCEL when asked to retry: Can't delete E:\DCS World\CoreMods/aircraft/Christen Eagle II/bin/CE2_AI.dll: (5) Access is denied.
00870.723 STATUS: Can't delete E:\DCS World\CoreMods/aircraft/Christen Eagle II/bin/CE2_AI.dll: (5) Access is denied.
00871.706 === Log closed.

 

 

*edit*

Nevermind, the problem was DCS didn't close properly last time, was still running in the background so the file was "in use" and therefor couldn't be deleted...


Edited by Raven (Elysian Angel)
  • Like 1
Spoiler

Ryzen 9 5900X | 64GB G.Skill TridentZ 3600 | Gigabyte RX6900XT | ASUS ROG Strix X570-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 960Pro 1TB NMVe | HP Reverb G2
Pro Flight Trainer Puma | VIRPIL MT-50CM2+3 base / CM2 x2 grip with 200 mm S-curve extension + CM3 throttle + CP2/3 + FSSB R3L + VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | TPR rudder pedals

OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS "HIGH" preset

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, VDV said:

Added "SA-5 (S-200) with a 3D-radar ST-68U, TIR and launchers." 

 

I cant find this "TIR" vehicle in SA-5 SAM system, where is it? 

Thanks!

 

Added a Syrian version SA-5 (S-200) with a 3D-radar ST-68U, TIR and launchers.

Raidhen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Car147 said:

 

Ah,  thanks. I am running the stable version.

 

Cheer's

There‘s not much harm in using the open beta.

If you have space you can install both.

  • Like 1

"Muß ich denn jedes Mal, wenn ich sauge oder saugblase den Schlauchstecker in die Schlauchnut schieben?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, VDV said:

Added "SA-5 (S-200) with a 3D-radar ST-68U, TIR and launchers." 

 

I cant find this "TIR" vehicle in SA-5 SAM system, where is it? 

Thanks!

 

It's the 5N62 "Square Pair" TR.

Modules I own: F-14A/B, Mi-24P, AV-8B N/A, AJS 37, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk.

Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas.

System:

GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV.

Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any particular reason why there's lots of files that were ok to modify now fail integrity check?

For example, modifying any of the indicator files now fails integrity check!

These were modified so that various displays could be exported.

 

Or renaming the viewport in the MFD files from say Right_MFCD to F18_Right_MFCD also now fails integrity check 😭

 

 

Screen_210917_202129.png


Edited by jonsky7
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want to say that I really like the changes made to the campaign UI. Really nice. Much better than starting all over just to play a particular mission. Nice job!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 4

Win 10, AMD FX9590/water cooled, 32GB RAM, 250GB SSD system, 1TB SSD (DCS installed), 2TB HD, Warthog HOTAS, MFG rudders, Track IR 5, LG Ultrawide, Logitech Speakers w/sub, Fans, Case, cell phone, wallet, keys.....printer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Raven (Elysian Angel) said:

Just a tiny bit more for me:

 

image.png

 

6 hours ago, MAXsenna said:

Finally home to join the club! 😊

At least I got decent speed! 😁

Thanks ED!

 

image.png

 

EDIT: And we're done. This rocked! 45 Gigs in less than five minutes!!!

 

Cries in Helmut Kohl's prehistoric copper lines... (we're waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay back in fibreoptic...) always a good idea to start downloading before going to sleep, just hoping that nothing interrupts the process, like a drive that's too full already with like 120 Gigs still free of space (BTDT) rdlaugh.png

 

  • Like 1

dcsdashie-hb-ed.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Phantom453 said:

Normally does the first time a map has been downloaded or updated.  Try reloading it a couple of times and it should be fine.

I have reloaded a lot of time. I have also taken a slow repair of the game. But the loading time are very long , spesial on The Channel map. At least ten times longer than before. And the game also have a lot of lagg now after the update. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/17/2021 at 6:18 PM, Nealius said:

No mention of the new bullet impact effects. Was hoping those got in giving the Mossie's A2G role and the unrealistic water explosions caused by everything down to 9mm. 

When can we expect the new effects to be in? Next OB Update? Maybe Hotfix? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, DCSoping said:

wow they did not just tweak the F16 radar a little bit. Feels like they just -50% it's performance. 

It hurts 😞

That's how OP it was.

  • Like 2

🖥️ Win10  i7-10700KF  32GB  RTX3060   🥽 Rift S   🕹️ T16000M  TWCS  TFRP   ✈️ FC3  F-14A/B  F-15E   ⚙️ CA   🚢 SC   🌐 NTTR  PG  Syria

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, DCSoping said:

says who

Everyone who knows the real aircraft, and/or has access to the real technical manuals.

  • Like 7
Spoiler

Ryzen 9 5900X | 64GB G.Skill TridentZ 3600 | Gigabyte RX6900XT | ASUS ROG Strix X570-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 960Pro 1TB NMVe | HP Reverb G2
Pro Flight Trainer Puma | VIRPIL MT-50CM2+3 base / CM2 x2 grip with 200 mm S-curve extension + CM3 throttle + CP2/3 + FSSB R3L + VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | TPR rudder pedals

OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS "HIGH" preset

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DCS 2.7.6.12852 Open Beta
AN/APG-68(V)5 detection and tracking ranges have been adjusted/reduced to match publicly available data.

 

@BIGNEWYMy question: where are these "publicly available data" from? I assume, that ED or you, have no problem with showing us the source of it.

Thanks very much.

These are values for V5 version of radar - I found publicly available:

APG-68 V5 (F-16 C/D)
For RCS 0.001 m2 class target:   6~7 km+
For RCS 0.1 m2 class target:   18~22 km+
For RCS 1.0 m2 class target:   32~40 km+
For RCS 5.0 m2 class target:   50~60 km+
For RCS 10.0 m2 class target: 60~72 km+

 

And these values are now in DCS- approx 45% better:

For RCS 0.001 m2 class target: ~9,6 km (5,3 nm)
For RCS 0.01 m2 class target:    ~30 km (17 nm)
For RCS 1.0 m2 class target:      ~54 km (30 nm)
For RCS 3.0 m2 class target:      ~71 km (40 nm) (JF-17)
For RCS 5.0 m2 class target:      ~81 km (45 nm)
For RCS 10.0 m2 class target:    ~96 km (54 nm)

For RCS 100 m2 class target:   ~140 km (77 nm) .. should be 95nm - but some magic knife cut max range same way as for APG-73 at Hornet, with same max detection range for RCS 100 m2.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the other hand, any radar performance change should be done across whole DCS, or at least among most user popular fighter planes. Experiencing one or more radars OP while others are "tuned", - I'm not saying fixed, it's not good for anyone. I hope that fixing JF-17 radar will come next patch 😂. Oh, I forgot, that it's performance is based on some Pakistani pilot talk - I'm just kidding 🤞🏻, or not?


Edited by GumidekCZ
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...