AvroLanc Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 (edited) As per real life, JDAM should always have a 800ms delay from pickle consent to actual weapon release. It was even acknowledge by Wags in one of his first JDAM videos, but JDAM release is still instant. Could this be changed? Detail details.....been bugging me since forever. Also, there should be a minimum of 300ms between JDAMs in quantity release. Edited May 27, 2021 by AvroLanc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tholozor Posted April 18, 2020 Share Posted April 18, 2020 Also, there should be a minimum of 600ms between JDAMs in quantity release. According to documentation I have, the minimum release interval is 300ms, but 800~900ms for the first JDAM in the ripple. Minimum release time for 4 JDAMs should be no less than 1.7 seconds. REAPER 51 | Tholozor VFA-136 (c.2007): https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3305981/ Arleigh Burke Destroyer Pack (2020): https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3313752/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvroLanc Posted January 10, 2021 Author Share Posted January 10, 2021 Bump. Maybe JDAMs will get attention in the final push. Hornet awesome is so many ways, but little things need polish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvroLanc Posted May 27, 2021 Author Share Posted May 27, 2021 +1 again. Has this been considered by the ED team? Last push for Hornet might see the remaining JDAM functions getting looked at. Surely the pickle delay (800-900 milliseconds) and quantity release interval (300ms), would be an easy addition. A10 and AV-8B have this pickle behaviour already. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
escaner Posted July 27, 2021 Share Posted July 27, 2021 Maybe this should be posted in the bugs section for better visibility. After all it is an implementation inaccuracy. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunny Clark Posted August 8, 2021 Share Posted August 8, 2021 On 7/27/2021 at 5:12 AM, escaner said: Maybe this should be posted in the bugs section for better visibility. After all it is an implementation inaccuracy. "Implementation does not match reality" is not a bug. Oil In The Water Hornet Campaign. Bunny's: Form-Fillable Controller Layout PDFs | HOTAS Kneeboards | Checklist Kneeboards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AvroLanc Posted August 11, 2021 Author Share Posted August 11, 2021 Well, I posted it in the Bugs section and it got absolutely NO attention. Not even a [No Bug] tag or any attention, unlike most other issues posted there, it was purposely ignored. Maybe I was purposely ignored. Whatever.....Hornet's about as complete as it's going to get gents. So much for improvements suggestions. Even if they do come across as a little demanding, it's all in the course of a better product. I'm done with the Hornet for a while, coincidentally, much like ED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Svend_Dellepude Posted August 11, 2021 Share Posted August 11, 2021 53 minutes ago, AvroLanc said: Well, I posted it in the Bugs section and it got absolutely NO attention. Not even a [No Bug] tag or any attention, unlike most other issues posted there, it was purposely ignored. Maybe I was purposely ignored. Whatever.....Hornet's about as complete as it's going to get gents. So much for improvements suggestions. Even if they do come across as a little demanding, it's all in the course of a better product. I'm done with the Hornet for a while, coincidentally, much like ED. Dunno if you tried to pm mods, but if not you can try that. They are nice guys. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Win10 64, Asus Maximus VIII Formula, i5 6600K, Geforce 980 GTX Ti, 32 GB Ram, Samsung EVO SSD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts