Exile5121 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 I kinda hope we get that green one. looks good. also Inner pylon love? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blinky.ben Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 I kinda hope we get that green one. looks good. also Inner pylon love? Yes please, any word from Deka if this is possibly going to be added? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fragal Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 Seems like this is a no (judging from lack of response) :( Sad...I miss the inner BRM's so much it gave the JF so much more freedom with payloads same would be said for being able to carry 4 701's on the inner and outer pylons i'd probably use those more too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paco2002 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 Guys, give them some time, they're making progress in the module, changes in weapons will come, I'm sure, let's give them some time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxTrotAlpha691 Posted September 9, 2020 Share Posted September 9, 2020 Guys, give them some time, they're making progress in the module, changes in weapons will come, I'm sure, let's give them some time. @paco2002 I could not agree more, Deka has given us the best module in DCS and they have been responsive to the community so far. Let's give them some time but also keep the comments coming about how much this would change the game for the JF-17. Deka, we love the Jefff, give us back our rockets please! Muh naime is Jefff!!!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uboats Posted September 10, 2020 Share Posted September 10, 2020 (edited) adding brm1 to pylon3/5 is easy, but then it will cause a lot of trouble removing it, since it will affect all missions. we are still arguing internally and try to find more evidence (photos etc). also we need to further polish the engine surge effect once rkt mounted at inner pylon. let's focus more on feature completeness and bug fix at this moment. Hope we can get a final decision end of this year. Edited September 10, 2020 by uboats 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] My DCS Mods, Skins, Utilities and Scripts | Windows 10 | i7-4790K | GTX 980Ti Hybrid | 32GB RAM | 3TB SSD | | TM Warthog Stick | CH Pro Throttle + Pro Pedal | TIR5 Pro | TM MFD Cougar | Gun Camera: PrtScn | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AeriaGloria Posted September 10, 2020 Share Posted September 10, 2020 I’m fine without them. It might “work,” but to me it’s an okay limitation to get around, and it’s clear why this and small bombs are never done for inner pylons, you either need fuel or something big Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuumCuique Posted September 10, 2020 Share Posted September 10, 2020 Thanks for the update on the BRM 1-90 pods. Can I ask about the status of the 2 missing 500 pound class bombs, the Mk.82 snakeeye and Mk.20 cluster bomb) on the inner pylons. Are you considering them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxTrotAlpha691 Posted September 10, 2020 Share Posted September 10, 2020 adding brm1 to pylon3/5 is easy, but then it will cause a lot of trouble removing it, since it will affect all missions. we are still arguing internally and try to find more evidence (photos etc). also we need to further polish the engine surge effect once rkt mounted at inner pylon. let's focus more on feature completeness and bug fix at this moment. Hope we can get a final decision end of this year. Thank you for this reply @uboats. This is one of the reasons I love the JF-17, the important people will respond to you even if you dont get what you want right away. I am willing to wait until Deka is ready to address this issue with the BRMs on the inner pylons. We all want them, so as another member commented the other day let us be patient and give the devs time to make a decision. Muh naime is STILL Jefff!!! Salute Deka! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exile5121 Posted September 14, 2020 Share Posted September 14, 2020 Thank you for the reply @Uboats ! Glad to know you all are thinking about it, Keep up the great work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxTrotAlpha691 Posted September 14, 2020 Share Posted September 14, 2020 Thank you for the reply @Uboats ! Glad to know you all are thinking about it, Keep up the great work! See Deka, we all love the JF-17 and want the best version possible in DCS, yes Blufor will cry, but they cry all the time anyway! My naime is Jefff!! Salute Deka, we are patiently (kind of) waiting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PetRock Posted November 12, 2020 Share Posted November 12, 2020 Hello Deka, Hope all is well. Is this still on the back burner? Also will other weapons from the PAF/PLAAF be brought in as well like the PL-9, the Brazillian MAR-1, or other MIL-STD-1760 bombs? The BRU-33s on the inner pylons would be a huge help as well if that's allowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uboats Posted November 13, 2020 Share Posted November 13, 2020 we had an internal vote for brm1 on inner pylons unfortunately, we met gandalf Well, i will try again [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] My DCS Mods, Skins, Utilities and Scripts | Windows 10 | i7-4790K | GTX 980Ti Hybrid | 32GB RAM | 3TB SSD | | TM Warthog Stick | CH Pro Throttle + Pro Pedal | TIR5 Pro | TM MFD Cougar | Gun Camera: PrtScn | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnv2pt0 Posted November 13, 2020 Share Posted November 13, 2020 we had an internal vote for brm1 on inner pylons unfortunately, we met gandalf [ATTACH=JSON]{"data-align":"none","data-size":"full","data-attachmentid":7137079}[/ATTACH] Well, i will try again Maybe some Old Toby would change their minds! We're not above bribery... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuumCuique Posted November 13, 2020 Share Posted November 13, 2020 Has there been any vote on Snakeeyes, Mk.20s, and potentially dual ejector racks on the inner pylon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
some1 Posted November 13, 2020 Share Posted November 13, 2020 Has there been any vote on Snakeeyes, Mk.20s, and potentially dual ejector racks on the inner pylon? Second that. It would be nice to be able to mix those with a2a or SEAD payload. :) Hardware: VPForce Rhino, FSSB R3 Ultra, Virpil T-50CM, Hotas Warthog, Winwing F15EX, Slaw Rudder, GVL224 Trio Throttle, Thrustmaster MFDs, Saitek Trim wheel, Trackir 5, Quest Pro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uboats Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 no dual on inner pylon, not enough space [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] My DCS Mods, Skins, Utilities and Scripts | Windows 10 | i7-4790K | GTX 980Ti Hybrid | 32GB RAM | 3TB SSD | | TM Warthog Stick | CH Pro Throttle + Pro Pedal | TIR5 Pro | TM MFD Cougar | Gun Camera: PrtScn | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuumCuique Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 Single Mk.20 cluster bombs and Mk.82s snakeeyes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PetRock Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 Has there been any vote on Snakeeyes, Mk.20s, and potentially dual ejector racks on the inner pylon? Yes, any of the other ordinance as singles on the inner racks would be greatly appreciated. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J20Stronk Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 no dual on inner pylon, not enough space Really? With a modded loadout, spacing seems to be a non-issue. Is that only when you use Dual Racks on both pylons of one wing? If that's the case, can you guys make it so that you can carry Dual Racks on the inner pylon, but only if you don't have Dual weapons on the outer pylon on the same wing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonathanRL Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 As a Campaign Creator, I vote "yes" on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustang25 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 Really? With a modded loadout, spacing seems to be a non-issue. Is that only when you use Dual Racks on both pylons of one wing? If that's the case, can you guys make it so that you can carry Dual Racks on the inner pylon, but only if you don't have Dual weapons on the outer pylon on the same wing. It could be that even if the physical space provides clearance there is some adverse interaction with airflow on release that makes it unsafe to use the double rack. I don't know what the real reason is though, I'm just speculating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PetRock Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 It could be that even if the physical space provides clearance there is some adverse interaction with airflow on release that makes it unsafe to use the double rack. I don't know what the real reason is though, I'm just speculating. I think it may also have something to do with clearing the rear strakes as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxTrotAlpha691 Posted December 15, 2020 Share Posted December 15, 2020 On 11/12/2020 at 9:35 PM, uboats said: we had an internal vote for brm1 on inner pylons unfortunately, we met gandalf Well, i will try again Uboats, please do not give up on this, having rockets on the inner pylons gives the JF-17 real ground strike dominance. PLEASE do not give up!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonne Posted December 23, 2020 Share Posted December 23, 2020 If the developers have deemed rockets on the inner pods unrealistic, than I am very happy they have made the decision not to add them. Thank you Deka! This is not about balance, but realism. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts