vr Настройки Bignewy Reverb G2 для высокой частоты кадров

[imacken]

2 minutes ago, markturner1960 said:

I am sorry to bring this back, been re reading this thread and others, but am still not clear. To get the 100% SS as recommended by HP, that 100% figure is the end result figure derived from home x per app (IE 54 x 120 =65 in the above example, means I am running at less than the optimal 100% ?)    54 x 200 ( which I have set currently) = 108% just over optimal.....

 

above, you are talking about the difference between 54 & 100 % - again are you referring to the final multiplied value, or one of th two multipliers?

 

 

The final value.  Set the main value and the app specific to 100%.

[BIGNEWY]

The important thing here is to know you can change this value to suit your own needs and preferences, lower values will give you more frames. 

The purpose of this thread was to show that it was possible to achieve high frame rate or target a frame rate by adjusting the value. 

[imacken]

Good advice, but if you have motion reprojection on - which I would recommend on the G2 -  varying the SS won't give you more frames, but it certainly will change your frame times, and that is what is important.  There is a huge difference between 45fps at 22ms and 45fps at 11ms.

[dburne]

3 hours ago, imacken said:

The final value.  Set the main value and the app specific to 100%.

 

That is where I have settled for now, with Motion Smoothing on. Did some Hornet flying off the Supercarrier yesterday and was pleased.

[GatorNutz]

@BIGNEWY I just applied all of the settings as you suggested (Nvidia, DCS, and SteamVR) and I am getting 90 FPS with frame times around 10-11ms.  Thank you!!!

 

I was having so many issues and this helped a lot.

 

One question that...I noticed that you pretty much disabled all AA.  Is this by design, or would you suggest using some AA?  And if so, where (DCS MSAA, Nvidia MFAA, etc)?

[BIGNEWY]

21 minutes ago, GatorNutz said:

@BIGNEWY I just applied all of the settings as you suggested (Nvidia, DCS, and SteamVR) and I am getting 90 FPS with frame times around 10-11ms.  Thank you!!!

 

I was having so many issues and this helped a lot.

 

One question that...I noticed that you pretty much disabled all AA.  Is this by design, or would you suggest using some AA?  And if so, where (DCS MSAA, Nvidia MFAA, etc)?

 

Great to hear it has helped you. 

 

I have AA disabled as this setup is purely for high frame rate, MSAA will eat FPS 

 

But you can tweak this setup to find a balance for sure. 

 

thanks 

[falcon_120]

Question (dont have the PC for 1 week until I can try). What do you think is more demanding on the system, MSAA 2X + FSAA X2 or MSAA 0 + FSAA 8x like Bignewy? And what should look better regarding graphics? (like less sawteeth on lines...).

[markturner1960]

On 12/24/2020 at 8:26 AM, imacken said:

The final value.  Set the main value and the app specific to 100%.

 There is no way I can run DCS at a playable rate by running 100 & 100..........nearest I can get is around 74% ( 74 & 100) with motion reproduction on. All my other values are pretty much at base level to get that as well......I don’t see how people with say a 1080ti can run it at all.......

 

Happy Christmas everyone!!!

Edited December 25, 2020 by markturner1960

[markturner1960]

10 hours ago, falcon_120 said:

Question (dont have the PC for 1 week until I can try). What do you think is more demanding on the system, MSAA 2X + FSAA X2 or MSAA 0 + FSAA 8x like Bignewy? And what should look better regarding graphics? (like less sawteeth on lines...).

Big Newey does not run any AA if you check his settings? In NVCP MFAA & FXAA are both off and in game so is MSAA, SSAA & SSLR ......

 

In my experience you need MSAA at 2 in game for an acceptable visual quality, 4 I can’t run due to performance issues. I have not tried the others

[Katj]

Big Newey does not run any AA if you check his settings? In NVCP MFAA & FXAA are both off and in game so is MSAA, SSAA & SSLR ......
 
In my experience you need MSAA at 2 in game for an acceptable visual quality, 4 I can’t run due to performance issues. I have not tried the others

Please try enabling MFAA and report back! It should be easy on performance.

[SimHog]

So just to clarify something ... Syria, no matter what I try it's just a slide show, so I'm assuming its a "no go" map for VR?

Edit: for others veiwing this comment - I forgot to reduce SteamVR resultion multiplier.

Edited December 27, 2020 by CoderX71

[Ziptie]

6 minutes ago, CoderX71 said:

So just to clarify something ... Syria, no matter what I try it's just a slide show, so I'm assuming its a "no go" map for VR?

 

 

Don't have any issues with it here - although it does seem to be "less optimized" compared to other maps.  That being said, I've performed a "trick" that I was informed of that has made it run even smoother.  Not sure why, but I'm certainly not a computer programmer.  The MP server that I fly in, the creator has even further optimized the performance and it runs just as smooth as it does in SP, while flying in the MP server. 

 

I know the map has a much more detailed landscape than the other maps available in DCS, so could be part of it.

 

 

Cheers,

 

Ziptie

[speed-of-heat]

3 hours ago, CoderX71 said:

So just to clarify something ... Syria, no matter what I try it's just a slide show, so I'm assuming its a "no go" map for VR?

Works fine for me...

[imacken]

4 hours ago, CoderX71 said:

So just to clarify something ... Syria, no matter what I try it's just a slide show, so I'm assuming its a "no go" map for VR?

No problems at all with Syria map here in VR. Compared to urban areas in the Channel map, it’s a breeze!

[BIGNEWY]

5 hours ago, CoderX71 said:

So just to clarify something ... Syria, no matter what I try it's just a slide show, so I'm assuming its a "no go" map for VR?

 

I am getting 90 fps in syria in single player

[SimHog]

Cheers for the replies all, but I had PEBKAC moment

I forgot to reduce the SteamVR resultion multiplier 

Using the F16 - Cold and Dark Start mission on Syria I'm now getting stable 45 fps / 16ms over Incirlik, and 75fps / 10ms over open terrain.

[VirusAM]

 
 
Don't have any issues with it here - although it does seem to be "less optimized" compared to other maps.  That being said, I've performed a "trick" that I was informed of that has made it run even smoother.  Not sure why, but I'm certainly not a computer programmer.  The MP server that I fly in, the creator has even further optimized the performance and it runs just as smooth as it does in SP, while flying in the MP server. 
 
I know the map has a much more detailed landscape than the other maps available in DCS, so could be part of it.
 
 
Cheers,
 
Ziptie

Yeah very detailed map....And I think also that there is still room for optimization being still early access technically

[Photon]

Just got my own G2, and I've been looking forward to trying it out in DCS.

 

Unfortunately, I can't get a good enough FPS to where it can run smoothly. I've copied all of the settings in the first post, but I can't get anywhere near to 90FPS (and this is only free-flight single-player).

 

Been trying out free-flight in PG, but my FPS hovers around 45 (38-50), so I'm not getting a very good experience, and not high enough to get a stable reprojection going.

 

My system is a 9900k, 2080 super, 32gb ram

[dburne]

4 hours ago, Photon said:

Just got my own G2, and I've been looking forward to trying it out in DCS.

 

Unfortunately, I can't get a good enough FPS to where it can run smoothly. I've copied all of the settings in the first post, but I can't get anywhere near to 90FPS (and this is only free-flight single-player).

 

Been trying out free-flight in PG, but my FPS hovers around 45 (38-50), so I'm not getting a very good experience, and not high enough to get a stable reprojection going.

 

My system is a 9900k, 2080 super, 32gb ram

 

100% native resolution for Reverb G2 is quite high. On my rig it is 3172x3100 per eye.

That is a lot of pixels to push.

You can lower the resolution some in the Steam VR settings.

 

I personally am running it at 100% with Motion Smoothing enabled and get a pretty good experience at 45 fps. I have a beefy rig as well.

[Photon]

27 minutes ago, dburne said:

 

100% native resolution for Reverb G2 is quite high. On my rig it is 3172x3100 per eye.

That is a lot of pixels to push.

You can lower the resolution some in the Steam VR settings.

 

I personally am running it at 100% with Motion Smoothing enabled and get a pretty good experience at 45 fps. I have a beefy rig as well.

Yea, I'm also running the reduced resolution as per the first post, but I'm not getting anywhere close to 90. Maybe flying over an empty ocean 

[Yskonyn]

Do you guys feel that the shadows settings are resource intensive at all?

 

I noticed BigNewy disabled shadows, but I don’t see any performance change on my system from that while it does make the game look a lot less nice.

 

Aside from MSAA and Visibility Range what are the settings that affect framerate most in your opinions?

[speed-of-heat]

any form of AA, vis range, Shadows, Mirrors, AI (capable) units, and background processes outside of DCS

 

 

[BIGNEWY]

shadows will give you a hit, I tend to fly with cockpit shadows enabled now and terrain shadows off. 

[Jon Fenton]

Something I have just discovered (and I think is responsible!) for a huge performance gain on my rig...

 

opt in to the Steam WMR beta "lkg_release" via right clicking on WMR for Steam VR, then properties, then Betas and select it.

 

I had pretty much set up Bignewy's settings and was getting reasonable results with MSAA x2 and a few increases in various DCS setting with NVidia 3D settings as per the suggested ones at the top of this thread, but this new beta seems to have done something to vastly improve things.

 

I note it now selects a resolution of 2708x2648 on the default marker line for global video settings - giving a SS rate of 150%. (Note much lower than the previous Beta which gave stupid high resolution at the default marker)  This new resolultion selection would have been unplayable in the previous beta  (I was running at 56%) but now this is giving me 50-60 fps and at well under sub 20ms frametimes.  and locks into 45fps when things get tough and re-projection kicks in.  And the clarity is hugely improved!

 

I have a 2080ti and 9900k at 5GHz and 32GB RAM

[imacken]

16 minutes ago, Jon Fenton said:

Something I have just discovered (and I think is responsible!) for a huge performance gain on my rig...

 

opt in to the Steam WMR beta "lkg_release" via right clicking on WMR for Steam VR, then properties, then Betas and select it.

 

I had pretty much set up Bignewy's settings and was getting reasonable results with MSAA x2 and a few increases in various DCS setting with NVidia 3D settings as per the suggested ones at the top of this thread, but this new beta seems to have done something to vastly improve things.

 

I note it now selects a resolution of 2708x2648 on the default marker line for global video settings - giving a SS rate of 150%. (Note much lower than the previous Beta which gave stupid high resolution at the default marker)  This new resolultion selection would have been unplayable in the previous beta  (I was running at 56%) but now this is giving me 50-60 fps and at well under sub 20ms frametimes.  and locks into 45fps when things get tough and re-projection kicks in.  And the clarity is hugely improved!

 

I have a 2080ti and 9900k at 5GHz and 32GB RAM

Not sure about that beta. I think it's an old one.  I think lkg stands for 'last known good'. Might be wrong though.