bruh, you guys good?

[Toga10]

hello? anyone?

you guys have been dorment for a while. you good?

 

..

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

btw this is just a joke

[joelsi]

Puts on tin foil hat

 

Adams Group Simulation and Training

 

TG's 3D model of the cockpit^

 

Adams Group's 3D model of the cockpit^

 

Aaaaand this is at the bottom of the page:

 

So there's a chance that TG/AG got a pro contract and that may or may not be the cause for the radio silence but only TG knows the real reason.

[CMDRennie]

Best possible outcome: We get a training level module in DCS.

Worst possible outcome: TG drop the DCS module to pursue this avenue.

[Voodoo_One]

13 minutes ago, CMDRennie said:

Best possible outcome: We get a training level module in DCS.

 

Worst possible outcome: TG drop the DCS module to pursue this avenue.

 

I dont think they will drop it. But let's see what version we can get it in the "Arcade" version of DCS

Edited May 17, 2021 by Voodoo_One

[TLTeo]

I mean, it wouldn't be the first time either. That's how the original A-10C became a thing in the first place...

[blayas]

3 hours ago, CMDRennie said:

Best possible outcome: We get a training level module in DCS.

 

Worst possible outcome: TG drop the DCS module to pursue this avenue.

 

 

Best possible outcome:  We get a Tornado IDS too in DCS.

[Gierasimov]

14 hours ago, blayas said:

 

Best possible outcome:  We get a Tornado IDS too in DCS.

In years time, everything is possible. Even MiG-29K!

[Winfield_Gold]

Hardly amused by how many 'devs' come in with screenshots of a cockpit or external model design but fail to release anything.

 

Or...it gets shelved and ends up released on a competitor platform (or perhaps ends up as a private mod used for 'virtual airshows'.)  

 

Coretex Design's is a fine example of a DCS developer flop.  Times may be different these days, but not so long ago DCS dev license's were handed out like Christmas candy.  

Edited May 18, 2021 by Winfield_Gold
'added another ')'

[Wacko_ZA]

I have just seen something that cannot be unseen, and I have lost all hope. If that red circle is involved at all with this module, its doomed! 
It must be the reason we have not seen or heard from them since 12/2020

[TLTeo]

The lead 3d artist is the same. No more, no less.

[unknown]

11 hours ago, wackomedic911 said:

I have just seen something that cannot be unseen, and I have lost all hope. If that red circle is involved at all with this module, its doomed! 
It must be the reason we have not seen or heard from them since 12/2020

Miltech5 is one person(3d artist) that split with Polychop after some "internal trouble". He had no coder for the Bo-105 systems and was looking for one for a long time, thats why you see the Razbam logo beside the Miltec5 logo for the Bo-105, they are doing the system coding. 

The_Fragger(Miltec5) is also doing the 3d art work for TruGrit, Razbam has absolutely nothing to do with the EF2000 or TrueGrit. 

[Lampshade]

On 5/18/2021 at 5:10 AM, blayas said:

 

Best possible outcome:  We get a Tornado IDS too in DCS.

A year ago Kate flat out said a Tornado is never going to happen in DCS.

[Etirion]

8 hours ago, Lampshade said:

A year ago Kate flat out said a Tornado is never going to happen in DCS.

 

 

Panavia Tornado Wake - Chit-Chat - ED Forums (eagle.ru)

 

  

On 12/20/2020 at 5:33 PM, Wags said:

Dear all,

 

It seems that something may have been lost in translation. While we (Eagle Dynamics) have no plans for the Tornado, it is not off the table for a talented and qualified 3rd party.

 

As a huge fan of Digital Integration's Tornado, I'd personally love to see this aircraft in DCS someday.

 

Kind regards,

Wags

 

[Eldur]

On 5/17/2021 at 9:10 PM, blayas said:

 

Best possible outcome:  We get a Tornado IDS too in DCS.

 

Most underrated comment ever.

[Bagpipe]

On 5/22/2021 at 6:50 AM, Lampshade said:

A year ago Kate flat out said a Tornado is never going to happen in DCS.

Flipping heck has it been a year since Christmas already, better get the shopping done pronto!

[Conroy]

We need to be optimistic here.

 

We'll get Tornado too, finally.

[Zergburger]

Takeaways from this thread: EF2K in 2 weeks, and true grit confirms tornado IDS for 2021 release.

[Toga10]

Whilst I'd love a tonka, I think HB would do a better job of it

[Slant]

On 5/17/2021 at 5:32 PM, joelsi said:

Puts on tin foil hat

 

Adams Group Simulation and Training

 

So there's a chance that TG/AG got a pro contract and that may or may not be the cause for the radio silence but only TG knows the real reason.

 

Given that the Adams Group existed before TrueGrit and already had contracts with the German Air Force for simulations, I'm not inclined to think that they are the reason for the radio silence. It's most likely that they do not want to repeat the mistakes of certain other companies and go more the way of HB. They announced themselves, showed a few pictures to demonstrate that they're serious and now they're doing the bulk of the work that has to be done. HB did the same with the Tomcat. It's probably the smarter approach.

[FoxOne007]

On 5/18/2021 at 7:23 PM, wackomedic911 said:

I have just seen something that cannot be unseen, and I have lost all hope. If that red circle is involved at all with this module, its doomed! 
It must be the reason we have not seen or heard from them since 12/2020

You need to do some more research before spewing BS my guy!

[pierrewind]

Lets be serious for a second. You want something flashy and poppy? Well there are other simulators to go to. 

Now if you want a very deeply detailed eurofighter model with the very small detail that help to build a very true to life characterial airplane, then it does take time. 
Seeing experienced modders/codders join the project is to me showing how serious they are about it. This will in turn accelerate the development by avoiding some gotchas and shows how much investment is required for such a module. 

While the lack of update may be worrying I am confident this project is serious and updates will come out in due time. 

If not too bad. But keep in mind the team has 0 obligations towards any of us as of yet. So please, show them a bit of respect.

It's been a pleasure to see some of their screenshots and I will look forward to their future updates. 

Blue skies! 

[Duck21]

While I do realise that developing a Typhoon takes a long time and there will be times when there's simply nothing to show and talk about, I am worried right now seeing this abrupt radio silence from TrueGrit. Forum statistics say their members haven't even visited the DCS forums in over 2 months... that's not good 

[falcon_120]

I regularly stop by to see if there are news. 

 

I really hope its just a "full silent power development phase" that will happily became a "soon to be ready for EA" gift

 

Lets wait and see.

[Ghostraider]

I think they will inform us when there are relevant things worth publishing.

[WobblyFlops]

11 minutes ago, Ghostraider said:

I think they will inform us when there are relevant things worth publishing.

That's not how they operated previously. They often posted updates, smaller, not really that noteable pictures, interviews or really anything to keep interacting with the community. There are dozens of people asking them on their IG if the project is dead. Even if there's nothing to report, I would imagine that it's in their best interest to squish any rumors, not to mention that previously they posted a lot and had great PR. People may not remember but there was another DCS Eurofighter in development ages ago (coincidentally it was also somewhat related to official training products) and in fact that was much further along in development than this one and the MOD still iced the project.