Silver_Dragon Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 Has plans to add the italian rocket launchers and rockets? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLTeo Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 20 minutes ago, 6S.Duke said: No, we have planned to develop the AS-20 missile for all G.91s and to include it in DCS World as we have already done with other weapons (BAT-120, BAP-100 and Durandal) for MB-339 Hooray for mini RB-05s! 2 minutes ago, Silver_Dragon said: Has plans to add the italian rocket launchers and rockets? I imagine many/all will be already done for the MB-339, right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6S.Duke Posted June 7, 2021 Author Share Posted June 7, 2021 Has plans to add the italian rocket launchers and rockets? Yes, all documented weapons will be added I imagine many/all will be already done for the MB-339, right?Correct :) 5 MB339 EFM Coder Frecce Tricolori Virtuali [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 4 minutes ago, 6S.Duke said: Yes, all documented weapons will be added Correct In the pics the bombs appears as "WW2" style? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLTeo Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 Isn't that just an M1117? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6S.Duke Posted June 7, 2021 Author Share Posted June 7, 2021 Isn't that just an M1117?M117? Probably 2 MB339 EFM Coder Frecce Tricolori Virtuali [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 on a old documentary show AN series WW2 bombs. Surely can carrier them with M117/118 Koreans bombs and other more modern bobs. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xilon_x Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, Mars Exulte said: Con poche eccezioni ogni aereo ha bisogno di una pista. Non tutti hanno bisogno di piste PAVIMENTATE, ma hanno bisogno di una pista. Sì, passare dal marciapiede a un fosso a 200 nodi di solito provoca un incidente. Un fossato lungo una pista asfaltata non sarà preparato per gestire un aereo pesante ad alta velocità, perché... perché dovrebbe esserlo? C'è letteralmente marciapiede proprio lì. Se scappi dal marciapiede in un fosso, ti schianterai costantemente anche nella vita reale. Un fossato non è la stessa cosa di un campo di terra battuta e levigato (come le piste della mappa della Normandia) né è un'autostrada asfaltata utilizzata da auto e camion. Questa non è una distinzione difficile da fare, e mi stupisce davvero che le persone continuino a ripetere queste sciocchezze ancora e ancora da queste parti. Se questo è ciò che ti aspetti che faccia un aereo, allora sì, avrai lo stesso problema con tutti loro. Non puoi aspettarti che un aereo multi-tonnellata colpisca un buco di gopher o una grande roccia in un campo e non abbia un'esperienza negativa. Un campo minimamente preparato NON è la stessa cosa di un campo di un contadino o di un prato casuale. Gli aerei pesanti e/o ad alta velocità hanno bisogno di campi preparati, fine della storia. type of vehicle landing and take-off areas: FLYNG FIELD or AEREODROME.. taliano CAMPO DI VOLO or AEREODROMO. AVIOSUPREFICIE (italiano) AVIO SURFACE (english) airfields.also makeshift fields in italy lenguagge campo di fortuna. AIRBASE - BASE AEREA AEREOPORTO AIRPORT MILITARY AIRPORT AEREOPORTO MILITARE. this is a list of tipology of landing and take off opertating area. are much much different tyopology. Edited June 7, 2021 by Xilon_x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mars Exulte Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 (edited) Yes, it doesn't have to be paved, but it DOES have to be prepared. This is good. This is bad. WWII fighters are light enough and slow enough they can land in fields in just a few hundred feet, but there's a big difference between a 6,000lb plane that needs 1000ft and takes off at 100kts, and a 50,000lb plane that needs 4,000-6,000ft and takes off at 200kts. If you want to land in a meadow you use a helicopter, that's what they're for Edited June 7, 2021 by Mars Exulte 2 Де вороги, знайдуться козаки їх перемогти. 5800x3d * 3090 * 64gb * Reverb G2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xilon_x Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Mars Exulte said: Sì, non deve essere asfaltato, ma DEVE essere preparato. Questo è buono. Questo non va bene. I caccia della seconda guerra mondiale sono abbastanza leggeri e abbastanza lenti da poter atterrare nei campi in poche centinaia di piedi, ma c'è una grande differenza tra un aereo da 6.000 libbre che ha bisogno di 1000 piedi e decolla a 100 nodi e un aereo da 50.000 libbre che ha bisogno di 4.000-6.000 piedi e decolla a 200kts. ok the fiat g 91 weighed 5000 kg which is 110000 lbs. however the accident factor also depends on the type of trolley if it is resistent and sufficiently cushioned with hydraulic systems and also depends on the type and size and stability of the tires such as those as big as a SU25 truck to land on the grass is possible. Edited June 7, 2021 by Xilon_x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLTeo Posted June 7, 2021 Share Posted June 7, 2021 (edited) To be fair, the G91R (which is the size of a ww2 fighter and weights ~6800 lb empty) was indeed designed to fly from relatively unprepared fields, so on paper it should do better than say a Viper there, and it would be neat if DCS could reflect that capability. There's even a whole section in the flight manual describing how landing distance changes if you're landing on ice, a wet or dry hard surface, wet or dry grass, and with or without emergency breaks. Depending on conditions you get something in the range of ~500 to 800 meters on a normal surface, plus a factor ~2-3 times more than that on ice, ~0.7 lower with emergency breaks, and ~1.5 times worse with no drag chute. It's no Harrier, but it's not terribly different from e.g. a Viggen either. Edited June 7, 2021 by TLTeo 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xilon_x Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harlikwin Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 2 hours ago, Xilon_x said: 3 New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1) Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beppe_goodoldrebel Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 Cant wait.... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudel_chw Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 (edited) I love aircrafts of this era, would have prefered a Hawker Hunter, but this one is close enough Hopefully its development will be quick. Best regards. Edited June 8, 2021 by Rudel_chw 5 For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600X - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia GTX1070ti - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar - Oculus Rift CV1 Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkk01 Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 47 minutes ago, Rudel_chw said: I love aircrafts of this era, would have prefered a Hawker Hunter, but this one is close enough Hopefully its development will be quick. Best regards. G.91 will be an interesting addition to DCS… A Hawker Hunter would also be great 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harlikwin Posted June 8, 2021 Share Posted June 8, 2021 17 minutes ago, rkk01 said: G.91 will be an interesting addition to DCS… A Hawker Hunter would also be great Big +1 on the Hunter. 1 New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1) Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6S.Duke Posted June 9, 2021 Author Share Posted June 9, 2021 Drawing of G-91 at the Historical Archive of Leonardo - Aircraft Division (ex FIAT-Aeritalia) 5 1 MB339 EFM Coder Frecce Tricolori Virtuali [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kontiuka Posted June 9, 2021 Share Posted June 9, 2021 Really like flying the early jets like the Sabre so this might be right down my alley. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nessuno0505 Posted June 10, 2021 Share Posted June 10, 2021 Il 8/6/2021 at 00:58, Mars Exulte ha scritto: This is bad. In any case, I would not be very happy to put marmots under the wheels... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xilon_x Posted June 11, 2021 Share Posted June 11, 2021 (edited) Edited June 11, 2021 by Xilon_x 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkk01 Posted June 13, 2021 Share Posted June 13, 2021 That Tiger scheme is absolutely stunning…! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xilon_x Posted June 13, 2021 Share Posted June 13, 2021 (edited) 1 ora fa, rkk01 ha detto: Quello schema di Tiger è assolutamente sbalorditivo...! di livree di g. 91 tigrati ce ne sono abbastanza ma il g.91 somiglia più a uno squalo che a una tigre. Edited June 13, 2021 by Xilon_x 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YSIAD_RIP Posted June 14, 2021 Share Posted June 14, 2021 (edited) Can't wait.. maybe I will have a new Graphics Card by the time the MB-339 arrives or worst case the G-91R "Gina". Fantastico! Check out this interview that Duke did with SKYWARD FLIGHT MEDIA recently: Interview: IndiaFoxtEcho’s DCS Development Endeavors Edited June 14, 2021 by YSIAD_RIP 2 Do not own: | F-15E | JF-17 | Fw 190 A-8 | Bf 109 | Hardware: [ - Ryzen7-5800X - 32GB - RX 6800 - X56 HOTAS Throttle - WINWING Orion 2 F16EX Grip - TrackIR 5 - Tobii 5C - JetPad FSE - ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mayo25 Posted June 18, 2021 Share Posted June 18, 2021 (edited) On 6/2/2021 at 11:08 AM, 6S.Duke said: Today, June 2nd 2021, is the 75th Anniversary of the Italian Republic - and we thought there was not a better day to announce our second commercial project for DCS - since, in real life, it was one of the biggest successes of the Italian aerospace industry. DCS G.91 The G.91 is an Italian jet fighter aircraft of Cold War era designed and optimized for Strike and Recon missions. The G.91 originates in the NATO NBMR-1 competition in 1953, which sought a light fighter-bomber "Light Weight Strike Fighter" to be adopted as standard equipment across the air forces of the various member nations. The G.91 was declared winner of the competition in 1958 and entered into operational service with the Italian Air Force in 1961, and with the West German Luftwaffe in the following year. It was also evaluated by the U.S.Army and adopted by Portuguese Air Force, who made extensive use of the type during the Portuguese Colonial War in Angola and Mozambique. We will develop the following version: R1B (Italian version), R3 (German Version) and PAN (aerobatic version converted from the A version). We have no release window at the moment - and needless to say screenshots are preliminary. The G-91R4 did fly combat mission in Guinea and mozambique. On 6/7/2021 at 11:51 AM, 6S.Duke said: On 6/7/2021 at 11:35 AM, Bladigan said: Great news! I love this plane. Will be able to carry A/A missiles? For the records, the AIM-9B was tested only on the R4 variant without success. It was used on the G-91R3 with the Portugese Air Force. Edited June 21, 2021 by mayo25 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts