Baz000 Posted June 11, 2021 Share Posted June 11, 2021 Dunno if it has been asked before, but I know we have the captive carry AIM-9s currently in DCS... Can we in the future get captive carry AIM-120s? They basically would just be a reskinned missile, maybe with a slightly different 3D model to remove the rocket motor at the back and in regards to cockpit systems functionality? I'm not sure, I guess it would be like cuing the AIM-120 up like normal except it would never leave your rail as it has no rocket motor nor warhead. I don't know if IRL in sim mode on the master arm switch it would just simply simulate symbiology or if it could only be used at an instrumented range like NTTR for example. But at least could we get the cosmetic 3D model and textures into DCS so we can load them onto our training aircraft for NTTR type flights as red or blue air? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cupra Posted June 12, 2021 Share Posted June 12, 2021 Yeah.. would be really nice to have more training weapons.. just working in SIM mode... 1 DCS F-16C Blk. 40/42 :helpsmilie: Candidate - 480th VFS - Cupra | 06 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted June 12, 2021 Share Posted June 12, 2021 CATM-120 has into DCS Directories Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexCaboose Posted June 30, 2021 Share Posted June 30, 2021 Given that they are in the directories, it'd be great to see them enabled as a stores loadout option 476th vFG Website, 476th vFG Discord, 476th vFG Pipeline Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ST0RM Posted July 6, 2021 Share Posted July 6, 2021 Bump. The skins are there, so why not implement the whole deal instead of just reskins and mods? CATM-120/9s, TGM-65, etc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nealius Posted July 12, 2021 Share Posted July 12, 2021 +1. With the CAP-9, TCTS pod, BDU-33, BDU-50, TGM-65, and CATM-65, it's odd that the AIM-120 is the only captive NATO weapon not enabled yet. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wing Posted August 21, 2023 Share Posted August 21, 2023 Bump 1 www.v303rdFighterGroup.com | v303 FG Discord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACS_Dev Posted August 22, 2023 Share Posted August 22, 2023 We should also have CATM-120B, a number of units are still using a mix of those with the newer systems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Default774 Posted August 22, 2023 Share Posted August 22, 2023 CATM-120C in modelviewer null 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wing Posted August 25, 2023 Share Posted August 25, 2023 I am genuinely curious at this point... why is the model ingame-ready to go. But not actually implemented for utilization? It has been like this for over a year as well. What is the logic behind this ED? www.v303rdFighterGroup.com | v303 FG Discord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted August 25, 2023 Share Posted August 25, 2023 Just now, Wing said: I am genuinely curious at this point... why is the model ingame-ready to go. But not actually implemented for utilization? It has been like this for over a year as well. What is the logic behind this ED? Coding always take more time to implement with a 3D model, and actualy, will be a very lower priority. ED always build 3D models with after time integrate (or not) into DCS. Diferent Branches (3D modelers with a priority list, vs developers). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wing Posted August 26, 2023 Share Posted August 26, 2023 2 hours ago, Silver_Dragon said: Coding always take more time to implement with a 3D model, and actualy, will be a very lower priority. ED always build 3D models with after time integrate (or not) into DCS. Diferent Branches (3D modelers with a priority list, vs developers). I don’t see that as a valid argument anymore. It’s been over a year with the model already ingame, and it’s a CATM variant which doesn’t even come off the rails… 2 www.v303rdFighterGroup.com | v303 FG Discord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nealius Posted August 26, 2023 Share Posted August 26, 2023 On 8/23/2023 at 2:58 AM, Default774 said: CATM-120C in modelviewer null I'm guessing no way yet enable these in module lua files? There's been USN variant bombs in there for 3 years but no way to add them to aircraft. Fuse models can be put in, though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wing Posted August 27, 2023 Share Posted August 27, 2023 In the meantime, if anyone wanted a new version download of this: https://www.v303rdfightergroup.com/index.php?pubs/303rd-fg-catm9_120-re-paint.227/ 1 www.v303rdFighterGroup.com | v303 FG Discord Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutchie_031 Posted December 31, 2023 Share Posted December 31, 2023 Bump? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts