already known see faq Marianas island FPs

[Skysurfer]

It'll probably only get better with time and become more optimized. Might need to tweak the LOD and terrain mesh etc. Remember when Syria came out where it is now? Even on my older system it's perfectly flyable - DCS in general is fairly well playable with even sub 30 fps in most cases. And once you climb high for combat you get all the frames anyway. 

Edited July 1, 2021 by Skysurfer

[dSAF Dancer]

22 minutes ago, daemon1808 said:

What's weirder is that removing ALL map objects  (trigger) gives nearly the same performance. O_O

So: Either objects are calculated even when removed from map, or the problem is not in the settings or in the textures, shapes, etc.

Have anyone tried too to remove trees and buildings, and check again with usual current specs and settings?

 

I think they are still calculated, at least their collision objects are. If you delete a hangar per trigger and place something on top of it, it stays on top of the invisible hangar.


I really also hope for better performance, especially as some people have struggles with high end pc's.

 

 

But for the people expecting to continue to run dcs on the same settings with aging hardware, this won't happen due to the advancements of the game. If your computer can't upgrade there is a simple solution that really hurts. When 2.5 came around I couldn't run it (back then I could barely run 1.5), so I had to go back to 1.2 version of dcs. That was because I was playing on my mother s laptop that was a hot potato.

I still am a Student and am lowering my settings slowly as dcs progresses but I think it is unreasonable to expect a game that gets developped to new graphical standards all the time to be able to run on old hardware, so worst case you have to stay on an older version of dcs. The amazing thing with dcs is, that at least last time I tested multiplayer versions as late as 1.2 were working when the other player also installed 1.2

[rayrayblues]

4 hours ago, DmitriKozlowsky said:

Kewl. Guam runways are curved according to terrain.  Nice touch.

 

But, I only get 75-97 FPS over Guam in Gazelle. Usually in Gazelle in other theaters I get 120-140 in v 2.7. Down from 130-150 in 2.5.6.

 

I suppose I expected higher FPS over Marianas, due to being mostly water. But people say that water in 2.7.X is what dragging down FPS.

 

I would kill for 75 -97 FPS.......

[Raven434th]

I'd maim for being able to stay above 24 in all cases...

[NineLine]

1 hour ago, Veseroth said:

Also for fun I tested different graphics settings, set to lowest graphics possible and then highest graphics possible.. exact same FPS... that alone shows the code is not right and yes I cleared fxo and metashaders. 

If you are below system specs, well below, I am not surprised changing the settings doesnt help much.

 

At this point I am going to close this as its mostly the same people who have already been answered.

 

Please see the FAQ, we will be improving it, when its finalized we can take another look at your issue, but if you are below system specs, I can't do much for you.