Jump to content

DCS: Mosquito Pre-Order!


NineLine

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, Beirut said:

 

If you do not see the appeal of a Lancaster, I'm afraid your condition is beyond my ability to remedy.

 

 

 

The appeal would last as long as it takes to joy-ride around in it - and I get it, I really do, would be fun to bash around in a DCS: Lancaster.

 

But to use it in a realistic operational context? Where's the map? Where's the night fighters? Where's the Gee or H2S? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On previous threads I’ve given a clear 👎 to DCS: Lancaster…

 

But having played with FW190 night Ops I have changed my mind.  Night time visuals are both incredible and terrifying.

 

What’s more: 

- FIRSTLY….  all the component parts reqd for a Lanc are coming together nicely in DCS.  Navigator, check. AI air gunners, check, Bomb Aimer (not sure? B-17 AI?), radio DF and radar systems, check… 4 x Merlins and Flight Eng might be a challenge…

- SECONDLY… Often posted that the commercials wouldn’t work for a night bomber element , and I agree that this would need to be tested - BUT as a “sandbox” sim with an “interesting aircraft” first and foremost type policy, the Lanc should be an excellent fit. The US is probably the biggest single DCS market but interest in the Lanc likely to include virtual flyers from UK, Canada, Aus, NZ, South Africa.  The Mossie and Ju-88 could be a good way for ED to test the water on night Ops 

 

Channel and Normandy maps both work just fine 😉


Edited by rkk01
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Rudel_chw said:

 

A 7-crew aircraft?  Either one gets six friends to fly it with me, or the AI has to take care of most of the aircraft ... I really don't see the appeal. 

 

Appeal for a DCS Lancaster with all crew stations operative ?......Well put it this way if DCS could create such a beast and put it on the shelf for purchase,would I buy it ?.....of course I would.

 

However,before I get all exited and dewy-eyed over the prospect,I am brought back to the planet earth very swiftly with a big bump !......can you just imagine just how long this master project would take to get off the ground ?(excuse the pun).....the research into all the relevant crew stations,the extensive bomb bay,the four engines and the work required to get all of this to gel into a working flyable module ?.....not to say having an airfield created to use it from.

 

Let's be realistic chaps it ain't going to happen is it ?.....I mean never say never but honestly ?.....Nah,I can't see it happening......I hope I am proved wrong 👍

  • Like 1

Chillblast Fusion Cirrus 2 FS Pc/Intel Core i7-7700K Kaby Lake CPU/Gigabyte Nvidia GTX 1070 G1 8GB/Seagate 2TB FireCuda SSHD/16GB DDR4 2133MHz Memory/Asus STRIX Z270F Gaming Motherboard/Corsair Hydro Series H80i GT Liquid Cooler/TM Warthog with MFG 10cm Extension/WINWING Orion Rudder Pedals (With Damper Edition)/TrackiR5/Windows 11 Home

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Basco1 said:

Let's be realistic chaps it ain't going to happen is it ?.....I mean never say never but honestly ?.....Nah,I can't see it happening......I hope I am proved wrong 👍

 

Actually none of the issues you've presented are really that complicated to solve within the DCS framework. The "modern" modules we have in DCS are an order of magnitude more complex than any WWII fighter or bomber. 

 

In fact the only thing that has been nominally put forward by Eagle Dynamics as a potential technical issue is that 4 engine aircraft (regardless of type) are a no go within DCS world. I would argue that if there were a very significant interest in a 4 engine module that this would be an obstacle that their FM programmers would be able to solve. 

 

With all of that said I think the real reasons why we won't see any "large" bombers (either WWII or more modern) in DCS are purely monetary. 


Edited by Lurker

Specs: Win10, i5-13600KF, 32GB DDR4 RAM 3200XMP, 1 TB M2 NVMe SSD, KFA2 RTX3090, VR G2 Headset, Warthog Throttle+Saitek Pedals+MSFFB2  Joystick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Lurker said:

 

Actually none of the issues you've presented are really that complicated to solve within the DCS framework. The "modern" modules we have in DCS are an order of magnitude more complex than any WWII fighter or bomber. 

 

In fact the only thing that has been nominally put forward by Eagle Dynamics as a potential technical issue is that 4 engine aircraft (regardless of type) are a no go within DCS world. I would argue that if there were a very significant interest in a 4 engine module that this would be an obstacle that their FM programmers would be able to solve. 

 

With all of that said I think the real reasons why we won't see any "large" bombers (either WWII or more modern) in DCS are purely monetary. 

 


Agreed - I think everything required for the Lanc is already in DCSW somewhere, except for the four-engine modelling / AI Flight Engineer

 

As this is the Mossie section, I’d stress that it is the Mossie module that is bringing some of the extra bits to the game - eg AI Navigator….

 

…. and as the FB.VI was extensively used on night intruder Ops (but not as famously as the audacious daylight raids or Coastal Command strike wings), ED and / or the DCS community do have the option to test out how attractive or popular night missions could be

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/30/2021 at 11:17 AM, bart said:

 

The way I understand it is :-

 

For pre-orders of modules that are not yet released into Early Access you would get 30% discount.

 

For purchases of modules that have already released into Early Access you would get 20% discount.

 

So in this case you buy into the Mossie pre-purchase you get 30% discount on the aircraft ($59.99 -30% = $41.99)

 

If you buy the Channel Map and DON'T buy the Mossie you get 20% discount on it ($49.00-20% = $39.99)

 

If you buy the Channel map and have already pre-purchased the Mossie (at 30% discount) you can get the Channel Map for $34.99 ($49.00 - 30% = $34.99)

 

I just checked the ED web store and it's on there, you would have to log into your account so the system knows what you already have/have not got and I would assume add the extra 10% discount onto the Channel map when you go to the checkout. I can't check this part as I already had the Channel Map from when it first dropped last year. So I missed out on this offer on the map. I got 20% on it when it first released.

 


Has everyone missed what could (hopefully) be the most important bit of news in this…???!!!

 

Quote

With DCS: The Channel getting closer to its final state, we have created a special 30% discount for those that have pre-ordered DCS: Mosquito FB VI. We can’t think of a better pairing of two DCS World modules. 
 
Simply log into your DCS World account and pre-order the Mossie to automatically receive this limited time discount. Please note that this deal is only available until the 9th of September 15:00 GMT.

https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/shop/modules/mosquito/


So - Mossie launch on Friday 10th…?

 

Or open beta on Wed 15th…???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rkk01 said:

So - Mossie launch on Friday 10th…?

 

Or open beta on Wed 15th…???

 

Well, the only thing right now we do know for certain is the Channel Map deal finishes on the 9th Sept at 15:00 GMT.

 

My optimistic side say's this could point to a possible release of either the map update, or both the map and Mossie EA launch on the 10th Sept, with a back up of the 15th Sept in there just in case there's a last minute hitch and ED have to postpone it until the 15th. Another possible clue to back a 10th Sept launch window is if it definitely wasn't going to be the 10th and they were indeed aiming for the 15th then why not run the map offer up until the 14th Sept? ED could potentially bag a few extra sales on the map and the Mossie during the 5 days extra they could have run the deal for (10th - 14th) IF they were aiming for a 15th Sept launch date.

 

Another scenario is we are just seeing what we want to see and we won't see the Mossie in EA anytime this next month!! lol.


Edited by bart

System :-

i7-12700K 3.6 GHz 12 core, ASUS ROG Strix Z690-A Gaming, 64GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 3200MHz, 24GB Asus ROG Strix Geforce RTX 3090, 1x 500GB Samsung 980 PRO M.2, 1x 2TB Samsung 980 PRO M.2, Corsair 1000W RMx Series Modular 80 Plus Gold PSU, Windows 10. VIRPIL VPC WarBRD Base with HOTAS Warthog Stick and Warthog Throttle, VIRPIL ACE Interceptor Pedals, VIRPIL VPC Rotor TCS Plus Base with a Hawk-60 Grip, HP Reverb G2.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Channel/Mosquito discount for the map ends September 9th, that is when I expect the Mosquito to hit EA.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor | Asus TUFF nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 OC | Asus ROG Crosshair VII Dark Hero | 64GB Crucial Ballistix DDR4-3600 RAM | Windows 10 Pro x64 | Virpil MT-50 CM2 Throttle | Virpil Alpha on WarBRD base |  Virpil Ace 1 Rudder Pedals | Saitek Pro Flight Throttle Quadrant (x2) |Acer x34 P 3440 x 1440 | Valve Index VR | DCS on NVME

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, razo+r said:

 

Well, it definitly won't be this month anymore 😄

 

ROFL. I got a day ahead of myself!!!

 

Fixed 😉


Edited by bart

System :-

i7-12700K 3.6 GHz 12 core, ASUS ROG Strix Z690-A Gaming, 64GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 3200MHz, 24GB Asus ROG Strix Geforce RTX 3090, 1x 500GB Samsung 980 PRO M.2, 1x 2TB Samsung 980 PRO M.2, Corsair 1000W RMx Series Modular 80 Plus Gold PSU, Windows 10. VIRPIL VPC WarBRD Base with HOTAS Warthog Stick and Warthog Throttle, VIRPIL ACE Interceptor Pedals, VIRPIL VPC Rotor TCS Plus Base with a Hawk-60 Grip, HP Reverb G2.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, DD_Fenrir said:

 

The appeal would last as long as it takes to joy-ride around in it - and I get it, I really do, would be fun to bash around in a DCS: Lancaster.

 

But to use it in a realistic operational context? Where's the map? Where's the night fighters? Where's the Gee or H2S? 

 

As I say with everything I want from DCS: give it to me and I'll figure out what to do with it. :smoke:

Some of the planes, but all of the maps!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Mossie will be released not before 15th of September till the end of this Month. In one official news it was wrote - early Autumn, so 22/23 of September maybe when the Autumn 2021 will start. Open beta firstly like always.


Edited by YoYo

Webmaster of http://www.yoyosims.pl

Yoyosimsbanner.gif

Win 10 64, i9-13900 KF, RTX  4090 24Gb OC, RAM 64Gb Corsair Vengeance LED OC@3600MHz,, 3xSSD+3xSSD M.2 NVMe, Predator XB271HU res.2560x1440 27'' G-sync, Sound Blaster Z + 5.1, TiR5, [MSFS, P3Dv5, DCS, RoF, Condor2, IL-2 CoD/BoX] VR fly only: Meta Quest Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/31/2021 at 1:11 PM, rkk01 said:

On previous threads I’ve given a clear 👎 to DCS: Lancaster…

 

But having played with FW190 night Ops I have changed my mind.  Night time visuals are both incredible and terrifying.

 

What’s more: 

- FIRSTLY….  all the component parts reqd for a Lanc are coming together nicely in DCS.  Navigator, check. AI air gunners, check, Bomb Aimer (not sure? B-17 AI?), radio DF and radar systems, check… 4 x Merlins and Flight Eng might be a challenge…

- SECONDLY… Often posted that the commercials wouldn’t work for a night bomber element , and I agree that this would need to be tested - BUT as a “sandbox” sim with an “interesting aircraft” first and foremost type policy, the Lanc should be an excellent fit. The US is probably the biggest single DCS market but interest in the Lanc likely to include virtual flyers from UK, Canada, Aus, NZ, South Africa.  The Mossie and Ju-88 could be a good way for ED to test the water on night Ops 

 

Channel and Normandy maps both work just fine 😉

 

IF I were allowed to daydeam for a while...

 

What could be a better way to make the dynamic campaign system really rock than to have day and night roles in WW2?  It's less important for the modern jets, of course, as they're mainly all weather day/night birds but imagine a campaign that ran for a week or two, 24/7!

 

Then we could have Mossies hitting targets during the day, escorted by P-51s and intercepted by Doras and A8 and then Lancs attacking targets by night with Mossie NF in the stream trying to defeat attacks by Ju88 and 110s.

 

Going the other way, there'd be HE-100 and JU-88 raiders being intercepted by Spits during the day and Mosquito NF during the night.

 

Of course, if you add in B-17s during the day, the US market would explode all over itself 😉

 

But the serious point is, it's not impossible to imagine a dynamic WW2 scenario that could run over several days. It would need some more a/c types (He-111, JU-88 day/night and Mosquito NF) but it's not inconceivable even if it would take more than a couple of weeks 😞


Edited by Morat
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Morat said:

IF I were allowed to daydeam for a while...

 

What could be a better way to make the dynamic campaign system really rock than to have day and night roles in WW2?  It's less important for the modern jets, of course, as they're mainly all weather day/night birds but imagine a campaign that ran for a week or two, 24/7!

 

Then we could have Mossies hitting targets during the day, escorted by P-51s and intercepted by Doras and A8 and then Lancs attacking targets by night with Mossie NF in the stream trying to defeat attacks by Ju88 and 110s.

 

Going the other way, there'd be HE-100 and JU-88 raiders being intercepted by Spits during the day and Mosquito NF during the night.

 

Of course, if you add in B-17s during the day, the US market would explode all over itself 😉

 

But the serious point is, it's not impossible to imagine a dynamic WW2 scenario that could run over several days. It would need some more a/c types (He-111, JU-88 day/night and Mosquito NF) but it's not inconceivable even if it would take more than a couple of weeks 😞

 

 

 

There's so much chronological inconsistency here it hurts.

 

He-111 was relegated to training, transport and night V-1 air-launcher by 1944.

 

HE-100??? 

 

Daylight formation raids over the UK by the Luftwaffe mediums after 1941...?

 

If stuff is going to be developed at least keep it relevant to what we have. If you wanna recreate the Battle of Britain there's other simulations out there that have done it more convincingly than DCS can at the moment. (Until DCS: Battle of Britain is announced...)

 

If you want to get some Luftwaffe bombers in, then okay, Ju 188, Do 217 and an He 177 could just about be argued, but even these were used almost exclusively at night...

 

And while Night-fighting would be fascinating for me and others round here (yeah, I get it - Mosquito NF XII or XIII for me please!) I strongly suspect a larger swathe of the community wouldn't and that renders it commercially unviable.

 

DCS has a watchword for technical authenticity, and we're just starting to see some of that ethos creep into the historical environment when we get these demands from the community for spurious types to flesh out ahistorical scenarios. I'd really it rather not spend development time get distracted by flights of fancy from school-boy imaginings of WW2 air combat. I can get that from War Thunder. I expect more from DCS.

 

You wanna shoot down bombers in Spitfire IXs? Try intercepting dawn or dusk Ju 88 torpedo bomber attacks on Allied shipping off the D-Day beaches on the Normandy map.

 

Wanna do night ops in a Mosquito FB VI? Then mimic the intruder ops performed by this very version - and WITHOUT radar - in 1943-1944 by tooling around Luftwaffe airbases as Ju-88s attempt to take-off for and land from their night raids over the UK.

 

 


Edited by DD_Fenrir
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, DD_Fenrir said:

 

 

There's so much chronological inconsistency here it hurts.

 

He-111 was relegated to training, transport and night V-1 air-launcher by 1944.

 

HE-100??? 

 

Daylight formation raids over the UK by the Luftwaffe mediums after 1941...?

 

If stuff is going to be developed at least keep it relevant to what we have. If you wanna recreate the Battle of Britain there's other simulations out there that have done it more convincingly than DCS can at the moment. (Until DCS: Battle of Britain is announced...)

 

If you want to get some Luftwaffe bombers in, then okay, Ju 188, Do 217 and an He 177 could just about be argued, but even these were used almost exclusively at night...

 

And while Night-fighting would be fascinating for me and others round here (yeah, I get it - Mosquito NF XII or XIII for me please!) I strongly suspect a larger swathe of the community wouldn't and that renders it commercially unviable.

 

DCS has a watchword for technical authenticity, and we're just starting to see some of that ethos creep into the historical environment we have these demands from the community for spurious types to flesh out ahistorical scenarios. I'd really it rather not spend development time get distracted by flights of fancy of school-boy imaginings of WW2 air combat. I can get that from War Thunder. I expect more from DCS.

 

You wanna shoot down bombers in Spitfire IXs? Try intercepting dawn or dusk Ju 88 torpedo bomber attacks on Allied shipping off the D-Day beaches on the Normandy map.

 

Wanna do night ops in a Mosquito FB VI? Then mimic the intruder ops performed by this very version - and WITHOUT radar - in 1943-1944 by tooling around Luftwaffe airbases as Ju-88s attempt to take-off for and land from their night raids over the UK.

 

 

 

Yes, there's a huge set of chronological issues, but it's my Day Dream not yours 🙂

But so far ED have been happy to count WW2 as one time frame even when they really shouldn't - so I was doing the same.

 

No one would be happier than me if ED were to introduce modules that would flesh out different time periods within WW2. For ease, consider different modules for Battle of Britain, Pearl Harbour, Africa/Libyan campaign, Normandy, and the End.

 

However, that's REALLY ambitious!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/31/2021 at 11:44 AM, DD_Fenrir said:

 

The appeal would last as long as it takes to joy-ride around in it - and I get it, I really do, would be fun to bash around in a DCS: Lancaster.

 

But to use it in a realistic operational context? Where's the map? Where's the night fighters? Where's the Gee or H2S? 


I do love it and the Lanc enables lots of fun toys, Blockbuster, Upkeep, Tallboy, Grand Slam. 🤔

 

Insane amount of work so It isn’t happening, and it mostly flew at night… B17 is probably more likely, although in its self very unlikely…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why couldn’t we have AI Lancasters, AI NF Ju-88 and/or ME-110s, an NF version of our Mosquito, and a night map of the area to be flown over?

 

We already have a JU-88. Add some nightfighter features like radar antenna and guns. A night map of France, the Low Countries and Germany would need to be no more than maybe bodies of water. The cities would be darkened. You can’t see the ground. We have FLAK, already, and add some search lights.

 

Start the missions in the air, to eliminate takeoffs and cut down on total time.

  • Like 1

TWC_SLAG

 

Win 10 64 bit, 2T Hard Drive, 1T SSD, 500GB SSD, ASUS Prime Z390 MB, Intel i9 9900 Coffee Lake 3.1mhz CPU, ASUS 2070 Super GPU, 32gb DDR4 Ram, Track IR5, 32” Gigabyte curved monitor, TM Warthog HOTAS, CH Pedals, Voice Attack, hp Reverb G2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Night flying on DCS........?

 

 

 

Chillblast Fusion Cirrus 2 FS Pc/Intel Core i7-7700K Kaby Lake CPU/Gigabyte Nvidia GTX 1070 G1 8GB/Seagate 2TB FireCuda SSHD/16GB DDR4 2133MHz Memory/Asus STRIX Z270F Gaming Motherboard/Corsair Hydro Series H80i GT Liquid Cooler/TM Warthog with MFG 10cm Extension/WINWING Orion Rudder Pedals (With Damper Edition)/TrackiR5/Windows 11 Home

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, DD_Fenrir said:

HE-100??? 

 

Yes, please! 😎

 

5 hours ago, TWC_SLAG said:

We already have a JU-88. Add some nightfighter features like radar antenna and guns. A night map of France, the Low Countries and Germany would need to be no more than maybe bodies of water. The cities would be darkened. You can’t see the ground. We have FLAK, already, and add some search lights.

 

I Like the map-idea.

The Ju 88 we have in game isn't really representative of a late '43 to mid '44 Ju 88 night-fighter, though. There would have been a couple of C-6s, but those weren't quite up there anymore in terms of performance. You'd need an R-2 or at least a G-1 model (both powered by the BMW 801) to get some improved performance. Maybe even a G-6 with the Jumo 213A motors.

 

The G-models do have the squared Ju 88 tail, which looks a little more appealing than the original oval Ju 88 tail.

  • Like 1

So ein Feuerball, JUNGE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take it easy. I am not against night operations, quite the contrary, it was a hugely important campaign.

 

All I am saying is that the original il2 developers while fantastic for that time do not hold up to ED.

 

Take the P-47 if they had gaps in information they would fill them, take the DCS P-47 no one else (as far as I am aware) have gone to lengths they have to recreate the lost data. To me this shows that they are committed to a WWII sim as close to realistic as possible. 

 

My two main concerns regarding night operations are:

 

1) I am concerned that the data for the radar systems of the period will be hard to find or nonexistent. I might be completely wrong.

 

2) A hell of a lot of time developing everything required for night operations for what is probably a very small user base. Therefore it will be deemed not worth the time and cost when these resources can be used elsewhere, clearly the team is incredibly busy and still have lots left to do to deliver a complete daylight operations sim. 


Edited by Krupi

Windows 10 Pro | ASUS RANGER VIII | i5 6600K @ 4.6GHz| MSI RTX 2060 SUPER | 32GB RAM | Corsair H100i | Corsair Carbide 540 | HP Reverb G2 | MFG crosswind Pedals | Custom Spitfire Cockpit

Project IX Cockpit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Krupi said:

Take it easy. I am not against night operations, quite the contrary, it was a hugely important campaign.

 

All I am saying is that the original il2 developers while fantastic for that time do not hold up to ED.

 

Take the P-47 if they had gaps in information they would fill them, take the DCS P-47 no one else (as far as I am aware) have gone to lengths they have to recreate the lost data. To me this shows that they are committed to a WWII sim as close to realistic as possible. 

 

My two main concerns regarding night operations are:

 

1) I am concerned that the data for the radar systems of the period will be hard to find or nonexistent. I might be completely wrong.

 

2) A hell of a lot of time developing everything required for night operations for what is probably a very small user base. Therefore it will be deemed not worth the time and cost when these resources can be used elsewhere, clearly the team is incredibly busy and still have lots left to do to deliver a complete daylight operations sim. 

 

Let DCS worry about those, and other details, such as square tails. I am expressing an interest for DCS to consider. Personally, given that no other sim has a nightfighter capability, this seems to be an untapped market.  Then again, maybe DCS has done their homework, and found there is not a market worth the investment.  None of us knows.

TWC_SLAG

 

Win 10 64 bit, 2T Hard Drive, 1T SSD, 500GB SSD, ASUS Prime Z390 MB, Intel i9 9900 Coffee Lake 3.1mhz CPU, ASUS 2070 Super GPU, 32gb DDR4 Ram, Track IR5, 32” Gigabyte curved monitor, TM Warthog HOTAS, CH Pedals, Voice Attack, hp Reverb G2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Untapped Market" 

 

Have you not paused to wonder why that is? 

 

"Let DCS worry about that..."

 

What a terrible attitude, you can't just request that they add something and point blank refuse to acknowledge the potential difficulties in achieving what you desire. 

 

Again I would really like to see a nod to the terrifying experience that crews had to experience, sometimes, on a daily basis. 

 

You could quite easily experience the nightfighter operations that the Mosquito FB Mk VI undertook without radar once we have this aircraft and a functional WWII navigational and radio system in place. But that is a very minor slice of night operations. 

 

True nightfighter operations, involve reproducing the Radar for both the RAF and Luftwaffe, navigational hardware that both used... What about Electronic warfare? Do you want to experience the effects of Window (which both sides used to fool radar systems) and arrive to find you have been outplayed and the enemy have dropped Bombs and are on the way home. 

 

Add to that the fact that many operations lead to just flying around in the pitch black and not being able to find the target at all.

 

I am currently reading an Autobiography (Mosquito Pathfinder by Albert Smith) from a Wellington and Mossie Navigator, he completed 90 odd operations from 1942 onwards and by his own admission he wasn't concerned about the luftwaffe but if the target was over the Ruhr he would get in to a terrible panic with the mere thought of the flak he experienced.

 

I will caveat this with two things, his experience in the Wellington over Ruhr /Germany was in 1942 shortly after he moved to the North African theatre where he sounded more likely to die from boredom than operations. So far he has only seen a Luftwaffe night fighter twice... After his first tour he decided to volunteer as a Mosquito Pathfinder rather than be told to join a large bomber squadron and we all know that Mosquito crews were able to fly higher and faster than the Lanc and Halifax so his experience of luftwaffe I expect is very biased simply from his own limited encounters. I haven't finished the book yet so there is the chance his blasé attitude towards the luftwaffes Wilde/Zahme Sau will give him a rather rude awakening but being in a Pathfinder Mossie I doubt it. 

 


Edited by Krupi

Windows 10 Pro | ASUS RANGER VIII | i5 6600K @ 4.6GHz| MSI RTX 2060 SUPER | 32GB RAM | Corsair H100i | Corsair Carbide 540 | HP Reverb G2 | MFG crosswind Pedals | Custom Spitfire Cockpit

Project IX Cockpit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...