Bronco Posted October 26, 2021 Share Posted October 26, 2021 I hope it will be migrated to SuperCarrier!!!! Greetings 2 DCS WORLD [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jester986 Posted October 27, 2021 Share Posted October 27, 2021 The animated deck crew would be nice. I think heatblur has certainly delivered on what they promised so it’s not like they owe it to us imho but it would be nice. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uxi Posted October 29, 2021 Share Posted October 29, 2021 Adding static shooters and green shirts in between cats 1 and 2 goes a long way. Would prefer the animated crew come in, but would be ok with it as is. Just come out with Saratoga and Ranger or just let the current model put on livery with the right number and name maybe. What I really want for Supercarrier level is Enterprise. Maybe Nimitz and Ike. 1 Specs & Wishlist: Core i9 9900k 5.0Ghz, Asus ROG Maximus XI Hero, 64GB G.Skill Trident 3600, Asus RoG Strix 3090 OC, 2TB x Samsung Evo 970 M.2 boot. Samsung Evo 860 storage, Coolermaster H500M, ML360R AIO HP Reverb G2, Samsung Odyssey+ WMR; VKB Gunfighter 2, MCG Pro; Virpil T-50CM v3; Slaw RX Viper v2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AG-51_Razor Posted October 31, 2021 Share Posted October 31, 2021 I'd love to see the PLAT cam available to us in the LSO position on the Forrestal! All the other SC features would be a huge bonus as well but like Jester said, I don't expect it but it would really be nice. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandan Posted December 30, 2021 Share Posted December 30, 2021 (edited) I want Forrestal with super carrier function，I hope Forrestal is not a ghost ship Edited December 30, 2021 by dandan 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomCat Posted January 1, 2022 Share Posted January 1, 2022 +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bies Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 I guess it depends on ED and some business agreement. It would be great though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spurts Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Not going to happen. SC is paid, forestall is free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 When ED complete the carrier API, has plausible HB and other 3rd parties, use them to add deck crew and other features. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey45 Posted January 12, 2022 Share Posted January 12, 2022 Maybe IF they do the other carriers in the class they will have the SC treatment... And keep the Forrestal as the free one without like the Stennis. The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LanceCriminal86 Posted January 14, 2022 Share Posted January 14, 2022 I'd rather the option to have them all with SC, or no SC functions, and have it simply swap the versions depending on if the SC module is purchased. That would be the ideal way to do it, let the 3rd parties add all the coordinates and locations to hook into the SC functions. If SC is bought, then it displays the SC crews and all that jazz. 7 Heatblur Rivet Counting Squad™ VF-11 and VF-31 1988 [WIP] VF-201 & VF-202 [WIP] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted January 15, 2022 Share Posted January 15, 2022 I'd rather the option to have them all with SC, or no SC functions, and have it simply swap the versions depending on if the SC module is purchased. That would be the ideal way to do it, let the 3rd parties add all the coordinates and locations to hook into the SC functions. If SC is bought, then it displays the SC crews and all that jazz.No, the 3rd parties need build specific locations and zones depend of your module and adapt your module to work your functionality. That is not put o a bucanner the cockpit of a F/A-18c and the module working. Enviado desde mi RNE-L21 mediante Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandan Posted December 3, 2022 Share Posted December 3, 2022 I hope to realize the function of super aircraft carrier as soon as possible, and make CV60 super aircraft carrier. CV59 is free, and CV60 requires payment 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charmin2105 Posted December 3, 2022 Share Posted December 3, 2022 vor 6 Stunden schrieb dandan: I hope to realize the function of super aircraft carrier as soon as possible, and make CV60 super aircraft carrier. CV59 is free, and CV60 requires payment Isnt the stennis also SC now but only for those who owns it? Could be the same with the forrestal and possible other carriers 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charmin2105 Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 vor 10 Stunden schrieb Бойовий Сокіл: No. Stennis just got a new model. When i choose the stennis i also have deck crew 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swordsman422 Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 4 hours ago, Charmin2105 said: When i choose the stennis i also have deck crew Just tested this and can confirm. They must have done it quietly. I never saw them add it for SC users in the changelog. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charmin2105 Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 vor 5 Stunden schrieb Swordsman422: Just tested this and can confirm. They must have done it quietly. I never saw them add it for SC users in the changelog. Thats not long ago, but i cant tell, maybe 2 - 3 month. Since that i got the hope that we could get the SC functions also with the forrrestal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 (edited) 32 minutes ago, Charmin2105 said: Thats not long ago, but i cant tell, maybe 2 - 3 month. Since that i got the hope that we could get the SC functions also with the forrrestal. That need coming from HB size, no ED. Edited December 4, 2022 by Silver_Dragon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charmin2105 Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 vor einer Stunde schrieb Silver_Dragon: That need coming from HB size, no ED. I dont know, on how much access 3rd Party Developer get on ED Content like the SC. If there is an API HB can use on the Forrestal, you're right otherwise its up to ED 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted December 4, 2022 Share Posted December 4, 2022 1 hour ago, Charmin2105 said: I dont know, on how much access 3rd Party Developer get on ED Content like the SC. If there is an API HB can use on the Forrestal, you're right otherwise its up to ED ED only build the API. The 3rd parties need build own features into your products. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spurts Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 ED also has to release the API to the 3rd parties 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LanceCriminal86 Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 You keep throwing "API" around but it's a lot more than that. ED barely even shares the "new" missile "API" with HB, nevermind the unfinished state of the SC implementation for crew, elevators, parking, comms, and LSO/IFLOLS. Yes, ED has implemented a way for the Stennis to be both SC and non-SC, which means yes, HB *COULD* add that on. But that isn't going to be done until the SC implementation/framework is more complete and nailed down, as the Forrestal itself likely needs to be "rigged" on the model side or have other reference points added and coordinates for crew, the ability to have unique/different crew skins to properly recognize the 80s-91 era of the Forrestal or later on for say the Sara, Indi, and Ranger, probably some kind of FLOLS instead of the IFLOLS of the more modern carriers, it would need internals added for the bridge/PriFly/Airboss, maybe even a briefing room skin. ED would have to have completed that themselves before a third party should even think about trying to add the same framework, and there would have to be some kind of documentation showing what is needed and how it would be done. 2 Heatblur Rivet Counting Squad™ VF-11 and VF-31 1988 [WIP] VF-201 & VF-202 [WIP] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr_sukebe Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 How can you "barely share" something with someone. Surely it's a bit binary, and either they do or they don't? Hardly as though they'd be able to give them a bit of the API is it? 1 System: 9700, 64GB DDR4, 2070S, NVME2, Rift S, Jetseat, Thrustmaster F18 grip, VPC T50 stick base and throttle, CH Throttle, MFG crosswinds, custom button box, Logitech G502 and Marble mouse. Server: i5 2500@3.9Ghz, 1080, 24GB DDR3, SSD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LanceCriminal86 Posted December 5, 2022 Share Posted December 5, 2022 Based on the previous discussions about the Phoenix, there is no API 'documentation', whitepaper, wiki, etc. as again it's still being worked internally by ED, but ED will sometimes provide values to use. The Phoenix may not even be 100% on the same "new" model as the AIM-120 if you peel further back. Heatblur Rivet Counting Squad™ VF-11 and VF-31 1988 [WIP] VF-201 & VF-202 [WIP] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indianajon Posted April 14, 2023 Share Posted April 14, 2023 Hi @IronMike, I know its been brought up before but i wonder if there is any news on a revised wake for the Forrestal? I love the model and enjoy landing on it but i have realised recently how much i depend on the wake for line up. Ta 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts