Gunfreak 发布于2021年10月26日 发布于2021年10月26日 I'm making myself a cold war scenario. Some F14s vs USSR with MiG21, MiG 27s and Su27s. None of my missiles hit none of the Soviets, not phenix, not sparrows, not sidewinders. My RIO gets good lock with the PH, but they don't hit. i7 13700k @5.2ghz, GTX 5090 OC, 128Gig ram 4800mhz DDR5, M2 drive.
Schmidtfire 发布于2021年10月26日 发布于2021年10月26日 (已编辑) The MiG-21 jammer - from my memory. is not very efficient. The SPS-141 was first and foremost created to counter the MIM-23 HAWK SAM system. Sounds like you need to practice more in the F-14 and launch weapons in better parameters. There is a software called Tacview that let you analyze your missions and engagements in detail, it's a good way to get a birds eye view and figuring out what went wrong and how the Soviets evaded your missiles. 本帖最后于2021年10月26日,由Schmidtfire编辑
TLTeo 发布于2021年10月27日 发布于2021年10月27日 The Sidewinder's effectiveness has nothing to do with jamming pods so indeed, it sounds like you're not launching within parameters. There was an issue a while ago with Sparrows not guiding on jamming targets, but that's been fixed.
Hiromachi 发布于2021年10月27日 发布于2021年10月27日 9 hours ago, Schmidtfire said: The MiG-21 jammer - from my memory. is not very efficient. The SPS-141 was first and foremost created to counter the MIM-23 HAWK SAM system. Sounds like you need to practice more in the F-14 and launch weapons in better parameters. There is a software called Tacview that let you analyze your missions and engagements in detail, it's a good way to get a birds eye view and figuring out what went wrong and how the Soviets evaded your missiles. SPS-141 was designed to counter MIM-23 HAWK indeed, but with time passing the capabilities of the set were improved and new variants were being introduced (such as SPS-142 to counter Nike Hercules). I have 1987 SPS-141 and SPS-142 manual which covers employment of SPS by Su-22 (SPS-141 MVG) and MiG-21 / MiG-23BN (SPS-141E or K). Its not very clear about differences between the stations, but maybe its me not being able to get much out of it since my German is as bad as my Japanese But there is a table which I figured would be interesting: I dont know how useful it would be against aircraft like F-14 or F-15 but manual and designers accounted for all the newest types of radars. AMD Ryzen 5900X @ 4.95 Ghz / Asus Crosshair VII X470 / 32 GB DDR4 3600 Mhz Cl16 / Radeon 6800XT / Samsung 960 EVO M.2 SSD / Creative SoundBlaster AE-9 / HP Reverb G2 / VIRPIL T-50CM / Thrustmaster TPR Pendular Rudder Pedals / Audio Technica ATH-MSR7
QuiGon 发布于2021年10月27日 发布于2021年10月27日 (已编辑) Does DCS even simulate different jammer effectiveness and jamming strength? I thought DCS just sets a flag if the jammer is active or not and that's it. 本帖最后于2021年10月27日,由QuiGon编辑 Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
TLTeo 发布于2021年10月27日 发布于2021年10月27日 3 hours ago, QuiGon said: Does DCS even simulate different jammer effectiveness and jamming strength? I thought DCS just sets a flag if the jammer is active or not and that's it. Yep, it's just an on/off flag.
QuiGon 发布于2021年10月27日 发布于2021年10月27日 On 10/26/2021 at 4:24 PM, Gunfreak said: None of my missiles hit none of the Soviets, not phenix, not sparrows, not sidewinders. My RIO gets good lock with the PH, but they don't hit. This has nothing to do with jamming. Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
Schmidtfire 发布于2021年10月27日 发布于2021年10月27日 9 hours ago, Hiromachi said: SPS-141 was designed to counter MIM-23 HAWK indeed, but with time passing the capabilities of the set were improved and new variants were being introduced (such as SPS-142 to counter Nike Hercules). I have 1987 SPS-141 and SPS-142 manual which covers employment of SPS by Su-22 (SPS-141 MVG) and MiG-21 / MiG-23BN (SPS-141E or K). Its not very clear about differences between the stations, but maybe its me not being able to get much out of it since my German is as bad as my Japanese But there is a table which I figured would be interesting: I dont know how useful it would be against aircraft like F-14 or F-15 but manual and designers accounted for all the newest types of radars. Very interesting! I know it’s just a flag in DCS, but it would be really cool if that flag could carry a value against certain types of systems, such as the Hawk. Fully simulated EW would be impossible, but I hope ED is planning a somewhat plausible system since EW is a big part of modern air combat.
QuiGon 发布于2021年10月28日 发布于2021年10月28日 15 hours ago, Schmidtfire said: I know it’s just a flag in DCS, but it would be really cool if that flag could carry a value against certain types of systems, such as the Hawk. Fully simulated EW would be impossible, but I hope ED is planning a somewhat plausible system since EW is a big part of modern air combat. I think literally everyone here would agree, that a more sophisticated EW simulation would be cool to have. Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
已推荐帖子