fapador Posted December 1, 2021 Author Share Posted December 1, 2021 @grafspeeYes the G-12 has stuff in the tail. Thats a whole second cockpit... It also lacks armament as an offset. I dont believe its less tail heavy than a fully armed K-4. It surely is lighter though as @Yo-Yo said Obsessed with FM's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grafspee Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 It's is definitely balanced in that way that is flyable System specs: I7 14700KF, Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Elite, 64GB DDR4 3600MHz, Gigabyte RTX 4090,Win 11, 48" OLED LG TV + 42" LG LED monitor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fapador Posted December 1, 2021 Author Share Posted December 1, 2021 So yeah. in my experience in tail draggers 40kmh discrepancy in tail rise is too much. I would expect 10km declination according to the video I posted. I would even take 20kmh but not 40... Obsessed with FM's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grafspee Posted December 1, 2021 Share Posted December 1, 2021 K-4 is heavier. System specs: I7 14700KF, Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Elite, 64GB DDR4 3600MHz, Gigabyte RTX 4090,Win 11, 48" OLED LG TV + 42" LG LED monitor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted December 1, 2021 ED Team Share Posted December 1, 2021 2 hours ago, fapador said: So yeah. in my experience in tail draggers 40kmh discrepancy in tail rise is too much. I would expect 10km declination according to the video I posted. I would even take 20kmh but not 40... You have no experience in the 109, and you only have a video of a civilian 109. You have not brought anything to suggest there is anything wrong. Sorry. It remains correct as is. Thanks. 2 2 Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts