Jump to content

8.8cm Flak range was reduced too much?


Killshot0597
Go to solution Solved by NineLine,

Recommended Posts

After the update I opened the mission editor to make use of the new AAA features. I immediately noticed the much smaller range of the 8.8cm Flak as I had already arranged them to have intersecting arcs. I then placed an S-60 battery in the middle of the group of 8.8cm and notice the S-60 now has quite a bit more range. Picture below shows the 8.8cm Flak on the left with S-60 to the right.image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
3 minutes ago, NineLine said:

Now add a KDO unit to the 88 group and you will see a yellow circle for it. 88's require the Kdo to be effective. 

 

I don't think that it's what Killshot means. I think he's talking about the gun range, represented by the red circle, and which was decreased by a lot with the flak update.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With or without the Kommandogerät 40, the range ring for the 8.8 cm Flak 18 and 41 are around 5 km, and around 11 km for the Flak 36 and 37.

Not sure why the Flak 18 and 41 have only half the range of the 36 and 37, I'd expect the Flak 18 to have the shortest range and the 41 to have the longest (owing to differences in barrel length, which correlates with muzzle velocity).

But the range rings do not depend on the presence of the Kdo.Ger.40, they're the same regardless of its presence in the group.


Edited by Northstar98

Modules I own: F-14A/B, Mi-24P, AV-8B N/A, AJS 37, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk.

Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas.

System:

GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV.

Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • ED Team

I see what you are saying now, could be they got reset due to the changes I am asking now. Thanks.

57 minutes ago, Mad_Shell said:

I don't think that it's what Killshot means. I think he's talking about the gun range, represented by the red circle, and which was decreased by a lot with the flak update.

 

 

14 minutes ago, Northstar98 said:

With or without the Kommandogerät 40, the range ring for the 8.8 cm Flak 18 and 41 are around 5 km, and around 11 km for the Flak 36 and 37.

Not sure why the Flak 18 and 41 have only half the range of the 36 and 37, I'd expect the Flak 18 to have the shortest range and the 41 to have the longest (owing to differences in barrel length, which correlates with muzzle velocity).

But the range rings do not depend on the presence of the Kdo.Ger.40, they're the same regardless of its presence in the group.

 

As I remember, the 18, 36 and 37 all have the same ranges, with the 41 having a longer range.

To me, it would make more sense that the "engagement zone" showed where the effective range of the gun is, and would be nice if it changed with the addition of optical or radar assistance. Its especially important for the FLAK guns in that in some cases it might be better to use them in a barrage set up rather than tracking depending on conditions and available guidance from Kdo or radar. 

Anyways, as I stated, something seems off, and it might be related to the changes we made with Flak.

  • Like 1

64Sig.png
Forum RulesMy YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**

1146563203_makefg(6).png.82dab0a01be3a361522f3fff75916ba4.png  80141746_makefg(1).png.6fa028f2fe35222644e87c786da1fabb.png  28661714_makefg(2).png.b3816386a8f83b0cceab6cb43ae2477e.png  389390805_makefg(3).png.bca83a238dd2aaf235ea3ce2873b55bc.png  216757889_makefg(4).png.35cb826069cdae5c1a164a94deaff377.png  1359338181_makefg(5).png.e6135dea01fa097e5d841ee5fb3c2dc5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • ED Team
  • Solution

I talked to the team about how these circles are rendered, and because they are 2D engagement zones, they are a rough estimation for middle altitude of the gun, it can be longer and shorter depending on the altitude of the target it is aiming at. There is not a good way right now to show that in DCS. 

64Sig.png
Forum RulesMy YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**

1146563203_makefg(6).png.82dab0a01be3a361522f3fff75916ba4.png  80141746_makefg(1).png.6fa028f2fe35222644e87c786da1fabb.png  28661714_makefg(2).png.b3816386a8f83b0cceab6cb43ae2477e.png  389390805_makefg(3).png.bca83a238dd2aaf235ea3ce2873b55bc.png  216757889_makefg(4).png.35cb826069cdae5c1a164a94deaff377.png  1359338181_makefg(5).png.e6135dea01fa097e5d841ee5fb3c2dc5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

In my current testing, the gun range indication on the map for the Flak41 seems to be accurate even with the KDO40. The Flak37 is able to engage at further ranges and higher altitudes than the Flak41. Doesn’t seem right. 

i7-8700k OC to 5.1GHz, Sound BlasterX AE-5, Creative Sound BlasterX H7 Tournament Edition, Asus ROG Maximus X Code

Corsair Dominator DDR4 32GB 3200MHz, EVGA RTX 3080Ti FTW3 Ultra Hybrid, Acer Predator XB271HU WQHD IPS Monitor, Logitech G510S, Anker 8000DPI Gaming Mouse, HOTAS Warthog, Thrustmaster TFRP Pedals, Track IR 5, Windows 10 Professional, https://www.youtube.com/c/iflyflightsims

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...