VTJS17_Fire Posted March 5, 2022 Share Posted March 5, 2022 Hi folkes, I read, that the SA-3/S-125 missile has two stages and that's (or one of the differences) why it is more agile, than the S-75 (for example). Are these two stages of the rocket motor simulated in DCS? And if yes, does the second stage fire up, when the first one is used or if the missile reaches a minimum speed/acceleration? Thanks in advance and kind regards Hardware: Intel i5 4670K | Zalman NPS9900MAX | GeIL 16GB @1333MHz | Asrock Z97 Pro4 | Sapphire Radeon R9 380X Nitro | Samsung SSDs 840 series 120GB & 250 GB | Samsung HD204UI 2TB | be quiet! Pure Power 530W | Aerocool RS-9 Devil Red | Samsung SyncMaster SA350 24" + ASUS VE198S 19" | Saitek X52 | TrackIR 5 | Thrustmaster MFD Cougar | Speedlink Darksky LED | Razor Diamondback | Razor X-Mat Control | SoundBlaster Tactic 3D Rage ### Software: Windows 10 Pro 64Bit [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike_Romeo Posted March 6, 2022 Share Posted March 6, 2022 (edited) 35 minutes ago, VTJS17_Fire said: Are these two stages of the rocket motor simulated in DCS? Yes they are. 35 minutes ago, VTJS17_Fire said: And if yes, does the second stage fire up, when the first one is used or if the missile reaches a minimum speed/acceleration? Directly after seperation. Its not a ramjet engine and so it doesnt need a minimum speed to ignite. Edited March 6, 2022 by Mike_Romeo 1 My skins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VTJS17_Fire Posted March 6, 2022 Author Share Posted March 6, 2022 Thank you very much. What I would ask was, if the second stage fires near to a minimum speed/acceleration to save agility against high maneuverable targets? Example: You fly a high-g maneuver to reduce the missiles speed (and so energy) and to counter that, the missiles starts its second stage if it reaches a minimum Mach or g. Otherwise, you could wait just to the moment, the missile fires its second stage and then perform that maneuver and left the missile with so less energy to fail to hit. That my thoughts for some SEAD tactics. Hardware: Intel i5 4670K | Zalman NPS9900MAX | GeIL 16GB @1333MHz | Asrock Z97 Pro4 | Sapphire Radeon R9 380X Nitro | Samsung SSDs 840 series 120GB & 250 GB | Samsung HD204UI 2TB | be quiet! Pure Power 530W | Aerocool RS-9 Devil Red | Samsung SyncMaster SA350 24" + ASUS VE198S 19" | Saitek X52 | TrackIR 5 | Thrustmaster MFD Cougar | Speedlink Darksky LED | Razor Diamondback | Razor X-Mat Control | SoundBlaster Tactic 3D Rage ### Software: Windows 10 Pro 64Bit [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon1-1 Posted March 6, 2022 Share Posted March 6, 2022 SA-3 is a fairly old missile, it's not smart enough to do things like that. It's not much more advanced than the SA-2, actually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kang Posted March 7, 2022 Share Posted March 7, 2022 It's more of a basic rocketry thing. It has a high thrust booster stage to get off the launcher and going, separates rather quickly after and fires the second rocket that burns for much longer but with less thrust to keep going. Basically it sheds the weight of the first stage booster, in a similar manner space rockets would. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts