lwalter Posted April 5, 2022 Share Posted April 5, 2022 I currently have a 28 inch 4K display, a PC with 3070 able to drive this screen at 4K at 60 fps with most of the settings set on high and TrackIR. Immersion is fine but it feels like looking at my cockpit through a window. VR is not for me yet. My PC wouldn't be strong enough (CPU) to drive a VR headset, and I'm afraid to be disappointed by the resolution compared to my 4K screen. So, I'm looking into how to improve immersion another way and I was wondering if using three 1440p screens, or large curved screen, would help. Would my 3070 be able to drive this combined resolution? How noticeable would the difference between 1440p and 4K be in that case? Other ideas are welcome too. iMac Retina 5K, 27-inch, i7 4 GHz, 32 GB RAM, AMD R9 M395X 4 GB | Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog | Cougar MFD | MFG Crosswind | EDTracker Pro | Realteus ForceFeel DCS World | Bf109 | Fw190 A8/D9 | P47 | P51 | Spitfire | I16 | C101 | L39 | F86F | MiG15 | MiG19 | MiG21 | FC3 | A10C | AJS37 | AV8BNA | F5 | F14 | F16 | F/A18 | M2000 | JF17 | Christen Eagle | Yak52 | SA342 | UH1H | Mi8 | Ka50 | Combined Arms | NS430 | Persian Gulf | Normandy | Channel | Syria | NTTR | WWII Assets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GPatricks Posted April 5, 2022 Share Posted April 5, 2022 (edited) I have 3 32" Samsung G5's curved (7680x1440 @144hz GSync) and if I was to do it again I would buy 1 Samsung G9 49". With triples comes some distortion in the outer monitors and of course the bezels are there. To say the bezels bother me would be incorrect, they actually "disappear" while playing but when looking beyond the center monitor there is definitely some distortion... use the 28" for a Helios cockpit extraction or to put a manual up on.. and don't forget a TrackIR! Pic is BMS 4.35 but you get the idea.. Edited April 5, 2022 by =LD=Icer 2 1 Asus Z790-PLUS D4, Corsair 1000X PS / Intel i9-13900KF @5.8Gz - Corsair H150i Liquid CPU cooler, 64GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 @3192mhz / 2TB M.2 NvMe Boot Drive (DCS World Beta installed here), 1TB M.2 Data drive, 1TB WD SATA drive, Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 4090 Trinity 24GB - Nvidia 551.76 driver / 3 Samsung LC32G53TQWUXEN 32" 7680x1440 at 144Hz / Win11 Pro Ver. 23H2 - Build 22631.3374 TIR 5, TM Warthog HOTAS\VirPil stick base, MFG V3 Crosswind Pedals, TM MFDs on 2 8" Lilliputs/ Simgears ICP / Varjo Aero VR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agrasyuk Posted April 5, 2022 Share Posted April 5, 2022 I'd say a larger screen is the way to go even if it costs some FPS. I have 49" ultrawide (basically pair of 27" 1440P screens combined) on my desktop workstation. 3070 should be able to pull it off reasonably well. 1 Anton. My pit build thread . Simple and cheap UFC project Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lwalter Posted April 6, 2022 Author Share Posted April 6, 2022 (edited) Thanks for the feedbacks! How noticeable would the move from 4K to 1440p ultra-wide be? I don't know if somebody already compared both. Of course, I can always try by myself this weekend with my current screen and compare 4K vs 1440p. I remember that between 1080p and 1440p, the difference was huge to my eyes. What about using one 4K projectors and stretching it wide enough? or would at least 2 projectors be needed to achieve a good result? Edited April 6, 2022 by lwalter iMac Retina 5K, 27-inch, i7 4 GHz, 32 GB RAM, AMD R9 M395X 4 GB | Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog | Cougar MFD | MFG Crosswind | EDTracker Pro | Realteus ForceFeel DCS World | Bf109 | Fw190 A8/D9 | P47 | P51 | Spitfire | I16 | C101 | L39 | F86F | MiG15 | MiG19 | MiG21 | FC3 | A10C | AJS37 | AV8BNA | F5 | F14 | F16 | F/A18 | M2000 | JF17 | Christen Eagle | Yak52 | SA342 | UH1H | Mi8 | Ka50 | Combined Arms | NS430 | Persian Gulf | Normandy | Channel | Syria | NTTR | WWII Assets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Limaro Posted April 11, 2022 Share Posted April 11, 2022 Personally, I'd suggest to use the 4k one Screen. The reason for that thinking is my experiance I had with VR: For me there the main immersion gain came with the larger vertical field of view - and not the horizontal of having three screens. A friend of mine uses three screens, but arranged VERTICALLY. This tells me that he had same feeling About performance, just calculating.. I'D say that 4k is more performant than 3*1440: ~11 M vs. ~8.3M Pixels. Windows 11 Pro 64Bit - AMD Ryzen 5800X3D - AMD 6900 XT - 64 GB RAM VPC MongoosT-50CM2 Throttle, VPC WarBRD Base, VPC MongoosT-50CM2 Grip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lwalter Posted April 12, 2022 Author Share Posted April 12, 2022 This weekend I finally made some comparisons between 1440 and 4K. Although I have to lower the visibility range by one notch, reduce the shadows quality and remove all anti aliasing in 4K to keep same fps (>60 over Syria and all other maps), I prefer it much better than 1440. Everything is much crisper in the cockpit, the landscapes looks more detailed too, and I don’t really miss the turned off graphic features. This is of course my personal opinion and others may think differently. So I’ll stick to my current 4K screen and I’ll look for a larger one someday. iMac Retina 5K, 27-inch, i7 4 GHz, 32 GB RAM, AMD R9 M395X 4 GB | Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog | Cougar MFD | MFG Crosswind | EDTracker Pro | Realteus ForceFeel DCS World | Bf109 | Fw190 A8/D9 | P47 | P51 | Spitfire | I16 | C101 | L39 | F86F | MiG15 | MiG19 | MiG21 | FC3 | A10C | AJS37 | AV8BNA | F5 | F14 | F16 | F/A18 | M2000 | JF17 | Christen Eagle | Yak52 | SA342 | UH1H | Mi8 | Ka50 | Combined Arms | NS430 | Persian Gulf | Normandy | Channel | Syria | NTTR | WWII Assets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts