Snappy Posted July 29, 2022 Share Posted July 29, 2022 Hi, are there any plan to overhaul the RWR indications to make them more realistic with ambiguities and inaccuracies, similar to the Heatblur simulates this on their F-14? As of now the Hornet seems to indicate threats with seemingly 1 degree accuracy. I know the F-14 uses an older RWR system, but then again some inaccuracy is inherent due to the involved physics, as far as I understood it. regards, Snappy 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted July 29, 2022 ED Team Share Posted July 29, 2022 As always, if you think there is an issue, please submit evidence and we can take a look. When it comes to RWR, its best to submit via PM if you are unsure if its controlled information. Thanks Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hulkbust44 Posted July 30, 2022 Share Posted July 30, 2022 On 7/29/2022 at 2:16 AM, Snappy said: Hi, are there any plan to overhaul the RWR indications to make them more realistic with ambiguities and inaccuracies, similar to the Heatblur simulates this on their F-14? As of now the Hornet seems to indicate threats with seemingly 1 degree accuracy. I know the F-14 uses an older RWR system, but then again some inaccuracy is inherent due to the involved physics, as far as I understood it. regards, Snappy Well that would be unrealistic, DCS is a little too perfect, but for now that makes up for the lack of INS stabilization...the Tomcat's is supposed to be crap. (based on the time period) Not to mention questionable design choices. I.e. putting receivers on the stabiltors that ya know, move all the time. We need to start with modeling radar correctly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swift. Posted July 30, 2022 Share Posted July 30, 2022 2 hours ago, Hulkbust44 said: Well that would be unrealistic, DCS is a little too perfect, but for now that makes up for the lack of INS stabilization...the Tomcat's is supposed to be crap. (based on the time period) Not to mention questionable design choices. I.e. putting receivers on the stabiltors that ya know, move all the time. We need to start with modeling radar correctly... Hornets RWR definitely has ambiguities missing, it wouldn't be 'unrealisitic' as you say. What it's angular resolution is, idk. But it's ability to identify the emitter is frankly miraculous in DCS. 476th Discord | 476th Website | Swift Youtube Ryzen 5800x, RTX 4070ti, 64GB, Quest 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snappy Posted July 30, 2022 Author Share Posted July 30, 2022 (edited) 8 hours ago, Hulkbust44 said: Well that would be unrealistic, DCS is a little too perfect, but for now that makes up for the lack of INS stabilization...the Tomcat's is supposed to be crap. (based on the time period) Not to mention questionable design choices. I.e. putting receivers on the stabiltors that ya know, move all the time. We need to start with modeling radar correctly... No, ED needs to start modeling RWR detection deeper/correctly , if you had bothered to dig a little deeper, instead of putting out some simple "Tomcat is supposed to be crap" line, you might know. Both aircraft use the AN/ALR 67 system . This comment by Heatblurs Ironmike explains pretty well the differences between the stock ED RWR logic and what Heatblur did instead in their simulation of the RWR system . And no, the receivers on the moving control surfaces are not the only problem for accuracy. The system is not perfectly accurate in reality either. Edited July 30, 2022 by Snappy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MARLAN_ Posted July 30, 2022 Share Posted July 30, 2022 I'd love to see a much less accurate/reliable RWR, as far as I know our RWR is waaay too perfect in DCS but I don't know the exact specifics, just that it's too reliable. That said though, as far as I know we also shouldn't have top/bottom blind spots (except for a tiny cone directly in front and low) and we are missing INS stabilization. 2 Virtual CVW-8 - The mission of Virtual Carrier Air Wing EIGHT is to provide its members with an organization committed to presenting an authentic representation of U.S. Navy Carrier Air Wing operations in training and combat environments based on the real world experience of its real fighter pilots, air intercept controllers, airbosses, and many others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts