Hulkbust44 Posted August 10, 2022 Share Posted August 10, 2022 Couldn't be simpler, based on documentation the AZ/EL should be accessible in NAV master mode as well as A/A. @BIGNEWYI will send you a PM. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cathnan Posted August 10, 2022 Share Posted August 10, 2022 I always wondered why it wouldn't be available in NAV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptPickguard Posted August 10, 2022 Share Posted August 10, 2022 Assuming the documentation is clear, this will be excellent for building SA from the NAV mode. I hope this is followed up on.Sent from my SM-F711W using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krippz Posted August 10, 2022 Share Posted August 10, 2022 This is not a bug. The AZ/EL format can only be selected while in the A/A format. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 195.201.110.22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hulkbust44 Posted August 11, 2022 Author Share Posted August 11, 2022 6 hours ago, Krippz said: This is not a bug. The AZ/EL format can only be selected while in the A/A format. According to what? I have applicable documentation that say otherwise up to a certain date. Highly doubt it was removed though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toilet2000 Posted August 11, 2022 Share Posted August 11, 2022 24 minutes ago, Hulkbust44 said: According to what? I have applicable documentation that say otherwise up to a certain date. Highly doubt it was removed though. A1-FA18C-742-100 011 03 p.4 paragraph 19 contradicts your point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hulkbust44 Posted August 11, 2022 Author Share Posted August 11, 2022 A1-FA18C-742-100 011 03 p.4 paragraph 19 contradicts your point.Yes I see that now, dated November 1st 2002.I’m looking at A1-F18AC-600-500 028 00 dated 2 years prior. Was it really removed? Only reason I could think for that would be if another function took it’s place. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hulkbust44 Posted August 22, 2022 Author Share Posted August 22, 2022 A1-FA18C-742-100 011 03 p.4 paragraph 19 contradicts your point.More applicable documents say otherwise. 742-100 is strictly for the APG-65, which we aren’t modeling. We reference it for when there’s nothing else, but if you have a document that states APG-73 then that trumps all.Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts