Baco Posted November 24, 2022 Share Posted November 24, 2022 I know its fictional and all but it will do while we wait for the navy phantoms.. No changes, no extra work, just that the carriers recognize it and we can launch from a CATOBAR carrier. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon1-1 Posted November 24, 2022 Share Posted November 24, 2022 Hardly "no extra work". You'd need a launch bar, with the real E doesn't have. No dice, this is a land-based Phantom. You should be able to trap, hook is the same as on a Navy Phantom. Gear isn't, but you're not taking off anyway. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Czechnology Posted November 24, 2022 Share Posted November 24, 2022 Sadly would need changes on the model and in the cockpit. Bare minimum of addition of catapult bridle and the in cockpit controls, and in reality the gun takes up the space that the bridle uses. We've just got to wait for the naval phantom to drop, friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fangs Out Posted November 24, 2022 Share Posted November 24, 2022 Speaking about the Bridle, what differences does it carry compared to the launch bar era of Naval aviation we have in DCS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
79Au Posted November 24, 2022 Share Posted November 24, 2022 vor 2 Stunden schrieb Dragon1-1: Hardly "no extra work". You'd need a launch bar, with the real E doesn't have. No dice, this is a land-based Phantom. You should be able to trap, hook is the same as on a Navy Phantom. Gear isn't, but you're not taking off anyway. No, you don't need a physical launchbar in a video game. I think OP means just the game logic and keybinds. Adding some kind of frankenstein carrier capability would increase sales in the beginning, isn't that what early access is all about? 1 Modules: AH-64D, Mi-24P, UH-1H, F-14, F-18C, CA, SC Terrains: Sinai, Strait of Hormuz, Syria - Wishlist: Desert Storm map, 1950s Sinai, Navy Phantom, A-6, Mirage F1EQ, AH-64A, MiG-17/23/25/29, dynamic campaign, live/historical weather - Social credit score: -20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon1-1 Posted November 24, 2022 Share Posted November 24, 2022 No. HB is better than that. They have certain standards of realism, and a magic catapult launch system doesn't factor into it. E is the land based version, end of the story. You'll get a Navy Phantom later. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krez Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 (edited) They have already said that a Navy version will be coming. Just wait for it. Edited November 25, 2022 by Krez 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DSplayer Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 You can try landing it manually with the hook and then using the full length of the carrier deck for a take off. -Tinkerer, Certified F-14 and AIM-54 Nut | Discord: @dsplayer Setup: i7-8700k, GTX 1080 Ti, 32GB 3066Mhz, Lots of Storage, Saitek/Logitech X56 HOTAS, TrackIR + TrackClipPro Modules: F-14, F/A-18, JF-17, F-16C, Mirage 2000C, FC3, F-5E, Mi-24P, AJS-37, AV-8B, A-10C II, AH-64D, MiG-21bis, F-86F, MiG-19P, P-51D, Mirage F1, L-39, C-101, SA342M, Ka-50 III, Supercarrier, F-15E Maps: Caucasus, Marianas, South Atlantic, Persian Gulf, Syria, Nevada Mods I've Made: F-14 Factory Clean Cockpit Mod | Modern F-14 Weapons Mod | Iranian F-14 Weapons Pack | F-14B Nozzle Percentage Mod + Label Fix | AIM-23 Hawk Mod for F-14 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bozon Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 Sound like a mod job. “Mosquitoes fly, but flies don’t Mosquito” :pilotfly: - Geoffrey de Havilland. ... well, he could have said it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
303_Kermit Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 I'd rather wait for proper B or J Don't like the idea 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northstar98 Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 (edited) Nah, not for me - the landing gear (specifically the tyres) can't handle the landing and doesn't have bridle hooks for the catapult. So, by all means, try and land on the carrier, but you'll have to wait for a repair for the tyres and you'll need to use the full-length of the carrier to get airborne again. Ultimately it was a land-based aircraft that wasn't carrier capable, I'd much rather get a carrier-based Phantom for naval-operations (also given that they have superior radars, and carry different Sidewinders, at least if you're talking about the J or later). Edited November 25, 2022 by Northstar98 2 Modules I own: F-14A/B, Mi-24P, AV-8B N/A, AJS 37, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk. Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas. System: GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV. Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baco Posted November 25, 2022 Author Share Posted November 25, 2022 Yeah the tipical naysayers. Purism over playbility. yep. oh well. god fobid they use the E as a C right? LOL... Guess Ill have to wait til 2025 or 26 with some luck and maybe by then we get teh Saratoga also LOL... 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bozon Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 Most responders completely miss-read the OP - he said “while we wait for the navy phantom”. He is asking to be able to pretend that the E is a naval phantom and operate it from a carrier, until a proper navy model is available (which will be a long wait). I can relate to that, but this is not a good idea to mess with the model and add imaginary features that will need to be removed later. A mod on the other hand could probably do it, and this is up to the community not Heatblurr. 3 “Mosquitoes fly, but flies don’t Mosquito” :pilotfly: - Geoffrey de Havilland. ... well, he could have said it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobra847 Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 Very unlikely- as we plan to start work on the Navy Phantoms very quickly and this would simply end up being a distraction 14 5 Nicholas Dackard Founder & Lead Artist Heatblur Simulations https://www.facebook.com/heatblur/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baco Posted November 25, 2022 Author Share Posted November 25, 2022 Thanks Cobra I was asking for two or four lines of code on a LUA, not a detailed experience, but yeah I understand. Never Mind... Someone will Mod it, just like the Tomcats "Early weapons". Cheers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparrow88 Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 Please don't ruin immersion with bull<profanity> features like that 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragon1-1 Posted November 25, 2022 Share Posted November 25, 2022 FYI, this is not "two lines of LUA code". Making an aircraft carrier capable is significantly more involved than that, even without changing the model. A whole lot of things need to happen in order for it to work. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
303_Kermit Posted November 26, 2022 Share Posted November 26, 2022 23 hours ago, Baco said: Yeah the tipical naysayers. Purism over playbility. yep. oh well. god fobid they use the E as a C right? LOL... Guess Ill have to wait til 2025 or 26 with some luck and maybe by then we get teh Saratoga also LOL... It's not a War thunder! 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northstar98 Posted November 26, 2022 Share Posted November 26, 2022 On 11/25/2022 at 6:37 PM, Baco said: Yeah the tipical naysayers. Purism over playbility. yep. oh well. god fobid they use the E as a C right? LOL... Guess Ill have to wait til 2025 or 26 with some luck and maybe by then we get teh Saratoga also LOL... Quote Digital Combat Simulator World (DCS World) 2.7 is a free-to-play digital battlefield game. Our dream is to offer the most authentic and realistic simulation of military aircraft, tanks, ground vehicles and ships possible. 5 Modules I own: F-14A/B, Mi-24P, AV-8B N/A, AJS 37, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk. Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas. System: GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV. Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulldog_1 Posted November 26, 2022 Share Posted November 26, 2022 Maybe.......We can get a carrier capable X-Wing fighter too 1 Digital Storm Lynx: i9-10850k (5.2 GHz): 64GB RAM (3200 MHz): 2TB SSD M.2 Samsung 970 EVO: 2TB Samsung HD: GEFORCE 2080 TI: Thrust Master WartHog (modified): TM F-18C joystick: Saitek Rudder Pedals: HP Reverb PRO: Volair Sim Cockpit: Current Stable Version of DCS IRL Retired Maintainer of the AT-38B: F-4E/G: F-15A/B/C/D: and McDonnell Douglas/Boeing Technical Advisor for the F-15C/D. I drive trains now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bananabrai Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 On 11/24/2022 at 9:21 PM, Baco said: I know its fictional and all but it will do while we wait for the navy phantoms.. No changes, no extra work, just that the carriers recognize it and we can launch from a CATOBAR carrier. As an interim I could imagine a solution like the A-4E mod, also has no launch bar and is still able to be launched. Don't see the point in not giving some people their toys, nobody is forced to use it if he doesn't want to. 2 Alias in Discord: Mailman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omega417 Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 Might be off topic, but I didnt think the Phantom ever had a Launchbar. I thought it had a Bridal system for its entire life. I could be wrong for the S/N as my knowledge of them is limited. The E is missing those Bridal connection points. But for the sake of the game and implementation I dont see a problem with a stand in "Carrier Launch System" that just makes it compatible with existing carriers, but I dont think that would be a critical path to release. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
303_Kermit Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 (edited) 7 hours ago, Bananabrai said: Don't see the point in not giving some people their toys, nobody is forced to use it if he doesn't want to. How are you going to visually spot a target if you can't see a post? It's cleared in these post from kind 3-rd party dev. It's not a 4 lines of code if it shall work properly. On 11/25/2022 at 7:58 PM, Cobra847 said: Very unlikely- as we plan to start work on the Navy Phantoms very quickly and this would simply end up being a distraction There's also plenty "soft core" flight sims and they are more kids friendly. Don't mess with The Phantom Some of us don't want another MiG-21 - strange combination of "bis" (in LOBUS variant) armed with RS-2US missiles. Most of us wait for pure Phantom. You want a US Navy? It comes soon as you may read here. Wait , buy , enjoy. Edited November 28, 2022 by 303_Kermit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vampyre Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 1 hour ago, Bananabrai said: As an interim I could imagine a solution like the A-4E mod, also has no launch bar and is still able to be launched. Don't see the point in not giving some people their toys, nobody is forced to use it if he doesn't want to. Great idea. For the people who want to pretend DCS is another game entirely, let the game modification people handle it. Heatblur shouldn't waste time on frivolous unrealistic "features" when the true naval version will be worked on immediately after the land-based version as has been previously stated in this very thread. Those who know about naval Phantoms know that the changes required are more than just invisible hookups to the catapult. The Phantom has to maintain a critical angle of attack to achieve a proper flyaway attitude. The F-4E cannot extend its nose strut and therefor will have difficulty achieving flyaway attitude before hitting the water without excessive wind over deck. If you have to do excessive wind over deck you might as well put it at 190kts in the mission editor and lift off vertically. I doubt Heatblur would want to mar their reputation with unrealistic capabilities built into their modules in any case. 6 1 Truly superior pilots are those that use their superior judgment to avoid those situations where they might have to use their superior skills. If you ever find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck! "If at first you don't succeed, Carrier Landings are not for you!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lieuie Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 Or you could just use the kuznetsov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts