ED Team BIGNEWY Posted June 29, 2023 ED Team Posted June 29, 2023 We are not going to keep going back and forth on this. If you have actual evidence that applies to our F-16 please DM me thanks Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal
Ramires Posted July 24, 2023 Posted July 24, 2023 The TGT SEP is not working. It does not seperate the threats anymore 6
TobiasA Posted January 8, 2024 Posted January 8, 2024 The RWR button "TGT SEP" does not separate the RWR symbols on the RWR: Attached please find a short track with a simple test mission. All icons are still placed on top of each other instead of separating them a little so you can read the numbers. F-16_TgtSep_does_not_separate.trk 1
ED Team Raptor9 Posted January 8, 2024 ED Team Posted January 8, 2024 The TGT SEP function can only separate RWR symbols in a radial fashion, outward from the center. If the radar symbols are in "Search" mode along the outer ring of the RWR display, they cannot be separated outward any further. Afterburners are for wussies...hang around the battlefield and dodge tracers like a man. DCS Rotor-Head
Yaga Posted January 9, 2024 Posted January 9, 2024 7 hours ago, Raptor9 said: The TGT SEP function can only separate RWR symbols in a radial fashion, outward from the center. If the radar symbols are in "Search" mode along the outer ring of the RWR display, they cannot be separated outward any further. TGT SEP functioning the way you are describing makes very little sense for exactly the reason you list: you can't separate outward for the vast majority of symbols that will be displayed. Especially when you consider that the primary use case is separating multiple search symbols on the same bearing. Interestingly, what you describe is not separation "in a radial fashion", as you put it. Radial separation is defined as: "Given some central reference point A, the radial separation between locations X and Y is the number of degrees (or radians, if you prefer) in the angle XAY". TGT SEP behaving in this way makes it a lot more useful because it breaks out symbols on the same bearing. I'm curious now if the reference material being used said "radial" and that word was misunderstood somehow. 4 1
rob10 Posted January 9, 2024 Posted January 9, 2024 This topic has been discussed extensively in this thread (post linked references as much as you're ever going to get on what the reference material is):
_SteelFalcon_ Posted January 9, 2024 Posted January 9, 2024 2 hours ago, Yaga said: TGT SEP functioning the way you are describing makes very little sense for exactly the reason you list: you can't separate outward for the vast majority of symbols that will be displayed. Especially when you consider that the primary use case is separating multiple search symbols on the same bearing. Interestingly, what you describe is not separation "in a radial fashion", as you put it. Radial separation is defined as: "Given some central reference point A, the radial separation between locations X and Y is the number of degrees (or radians, if you prefer) in the angle XAY". TGT SEP behaving in this way makes it a lot more useful because it breaks out symbols on the same bearing. I'm curious now if the reference material being used said "radial" and that word was misunderstood somehow. This. 1
skywalker22 Posted January 9, 2024 Author Posted January 9, 2024 Here we go again... seems that, until we won't find any proof how is this suppose to work IRL, we don't have any chance of ED fixing it. I've put lots of hours investigating, but so far no actual luck. If anyone else can provide anything... I hope someone gets lucky, and find something. 1
_SteelFalcon_ Posted January 9, 2024 Posted January 9, 2024 (edited) I doubt its some magical info that we‘re missing, it‘s likely a question of how the avaliable info is interpreted. Even in the f-5 the rwr tgt sep button works better than the viper… Edited January 9, 2024 by _SteelFalcon_ 2
skywalker22 Posted January 9, 2024 Author Posted January 9, 2024 12 minutes ago, _SteelFalcon_ said: I doubt its some magical info that we‘re missing, it‘s likely a question of how the avaliable info is interpreted. Even in the f-5 the rwr tgt sep button works better than the viper… I know, we talked about it in the past, ED also knows that, its theirs aircraft afteall. 1
ED Team BIGNEWY Posted January 9, 2024 ED Team Posted January 9, 2024 Threads merged. Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal
Mollerz Posted March 23, 2024 Posted March 23, 2024 (edited) Hi all! I'm pretty much a n00b and my mate and I have been learning the f-16 together. My issue is I can't seem to figure out how to get the TGT SEP button to work on the RWR. I hit it and nothing happens. Is this a bug, or something not added yet? Or hopefully, I am just doing something wrong and y'all know a fix? Thanks! Edited March 23, 2024 by Mollerz 1
Moonshine Posted March 23, 2024 Posted March 23, 2024 @BIGNEWY why is this a wishlist item and not a bug? it was working before you guys remodeled the RWR.. 2
ED Team BIGNEWY Posted March 23, 2024 ED Team Posted March 23, 2024 threads merged, it is correct based on the information we have. Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, PIMAX Crystal
Recommended Posts