A2G radar resolution picture

[YoYo]

Hi,

honestly I never thought about it, but does this option also matter in relation to the resolution of the A2G radar image (e.g. more clear objects on zoom .67 in SE)? What do you think?

[munckmb]

It kills my frame rate unfortunately.

[Insanatrix]

Hardly ever use the A2G radar unless it's extremely cloudy but I don't see why it wouldn't affect it to some degree. I've honestly never tested it though and I usually use just 1024, not every frame. It's expensive and doesn't really look any better. I think every frame option is for exporting to MFD's or external displays and it comes with a performance hit.

[Galinette]

No, it doesn't. This setting impacts 3D rendered stuff like TGPs and moving maps, not the A2G radar. It has its own built in resolution.

[YoYo]

12 hours ago, Kercheiz said:

No, it doesn't. This setting impacts 3D rendered stuff like TGPs and moving maps, not the A2G radar. It has its own built in resolution.

Ok, a little pity ;), small targets are hard to spot (like cars, tanks etc) even on max zoom of HRM, sametimes the noise from the ground is too big to find a difference.

[Eaglewings]

Ok, a little pity ;), small targets are hard to spot (like cars, tanks etc) even on max zoom of HRM, sametimes the noise from the ground is too big to find a difference.

Flew the inherent resolve mission last night.
Jtac gave a coordinate for a second attack which I inputted rightly, cloud was really thick so the Targeting Pod was significantly limited in finding the manpad and trucks at that position.

Tried hard to get those targets on HRM mode on the ground radar and no luck.
It is possible I was looking at the wrong location or I was asking to much of the ground radar for such targets.

Sent from my XQ-AT52 using Tapatalk

[BigBorner]

vor einer Stunde schrieb Eaglewings:

Flew the inherent resolve mission last night.
Jtac gave a coordinate for a second attack which I inputted rightly, cloud was really thick so the Targeting Pod was significantly limited in finding the manpad and trucks at that position.

Tried hard to get those targets on HRM mode on the ground radar and no luck.
It is possible I was looking at the wrong location or I was asking to much of the ground radar for such targets.

Sent from my XQ-AT52 using Tapatalk
 

I could not test it for the Eagle but while screwing around with the JF-17 AG Radar, it seemed that some ground units (like, Scud Launcher) do not have any radar return at all. I don’t know if this also applies to the eagle. 
 

Edit: 

Thats what I am talking about:

 

 

Edited August 6, 2023 by BigBorner

[Gideon312]

On 8/6/2023 at 10:31 AM, Eaglewings said:

Flew the inherent resolve mission last night.
Jtac gave a coordinate for a second attack which I inputted rightly, cloud was really thick so the Targeting Pod was significantly limited in finding the manpad and trucks at that position.

Tried hard to get those targets on HRM mode on the ground radar and no luck.
It is possible I was looking at the wrong location or I was asking to much of the ground radar for such targets.

Sent from my XQ-AT52 using Tapatalk
 

Maybe this YouTube from Notso will help:
 

 

Edited August 9, 2023 by Gideon312

[Galinette]

On 8/6/2023 at 9:53 AM, YoYo said:

Ok, a little pity ;), small targets are hard to spot (like cars, tanks etc) even on max zoom of HRM, sametimes the noise from the ground is too big to find a difference.

This was carefully adjusted from SME feedback. Making it better would be cheating!

[draconus]

On 8/5/2023 at 7:09 PM, YoYo said:

does this option also matter in relation to the resolution of the A2G radar image

This option controls the resolution of the rendered MFDs and mirrors but does not go beyond the simulated system resolution, ie. you'd be able to see better simulated pixels and screen door effect but you can't get more out of the A2G radar resolution details when zoomed in.