Tom P Posted September 1 Posted September 1 (edited) As a prior Master Gunner looking at these ranges and using some common sense you can tell these are pretty fubar. I'm not going to give away information, but I would love to know where this "correct as is" information came from. The M60A3 outranging everything by over 1nm..(Greatest MBT of all time confirmed?) Hate to be the bearer of bad news but those NATO MBTs 120mm are smacking those big scary T series all day long while the challenger 2 continues to touch them at 2.8+nm. Someone must have forgot that the Challenger has the world record of a 2.75nm tank kill on a T-55 sooo there's that. I placed each unit in the same exact spot, used the ruler to measure from the center of the vehicle to it's engagement range. It's pretty lame when making missions and the units can't engage because they're ranges are wrong. Edited September 1 by Tom P 5 1
Tom P Posted October 23 Author Posted October 23 This was a good talk, I really enjoyed the input and feedback on why the ranges are like this, and that we should just have the m60 as the main battle tank for all engagements and defense. Maybe next time we can incorporate more users into the discussion.
ED Team NineLine Posted Thursday at 11:21 PM ED Team Posted Thursday at 11:21 PM Where was this marked correct as-is? Please also understand that we do our very best to try to cover the entire forum in a timely manner, but it's a lot easier to see that one post you made than look at the hundreds of posts from hundreds of people. It does appear the M60 is overachieving and at the very least, the SEP is underachieving. I have not checked anything else yet, but I will discuss with the team. The bug report is a little rough; rather than trying your hardest to be sarcastic, it is a better approach to share what public info you can to prove your point, and if it doesn't get seen, DM someone. 1 Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
ED Team NineLine Posted Friday at 05:27 AM ED Team Posted Friday at 05:27 AM M60A3 Reported, M1A2 & M1A2SEP Reported. Edit: All Leo's Reported, Challenger 2 Reported. 1 Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
Silver_Dragon Posted Friday at 10:00 AM Posted Friday at 10:00 AM On 1/9/2025 at 18:31, Tom P said: Como antiguo Maestro Artillero, al observar estos alcances y usar el sentido común, se puede ver que son un desastre. No voy a revelar información, pero me encantaría saber de dónde salió esta información que se considera "correcta". El M60A3 supera a todos por más de 1 milla náutica... (¿El mejor tanque de batalla principal de todos los tiempos, confirmado?). Lamento ser portador de malas noticias, pero esos tanques de batalla principales de la OTAN con cañones de 120 mm están destrozando a esos temibles tanques de la serie T todo el día, mientras que el Challenger 2 sigue alcanzándolos a más de 2,8 millas náuticas. Alguien debió olvidar que el Challenger tiene el récord mundial de destrucción de un tanque a 2,75 millas náuticas, un T-55, así que ahí lo tienen. Coloqué cada unidad exactamente en el mismo lugar y usé la regla para medir desde el centro del vehículo hasta su alcance de combate. Es bastante frustrante cuando se crean misiones y las unidades no pueden atacar porque sus alcances son incorrectos. Tom, can put propper info about them? For Work / Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / 2xMDF Missing modules: Mig-29A / C-130J / F4UD-1 / F-5E Remastered / OH-58D / CH-47F / F-16C / F-14 / Mi-24P / JF-17 / Fw-190 A-8 / I-16 / CE-2 / Yak-52 / FC2024 Cold War Germany / Afganistan / Iraq
Recommended Posts