Jump to content

Next DCS (US) Fixed Wing Aircraft Wish List


diecastbg

Next DCS (US) Fixed Wing Aircraft Wish List  

4719 members have voted

  1. 1. Next DCS (US) Fixed Wing Aircraft Wish List



Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

isn't it a bit.... OP ?!:music_whistling::huh:

 

Not really, submarines are hard to nail from the air, but with one of those puppies you don't need quite as good a fix to nail it.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер

Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog

DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules |

|
| Life of a Game Tester
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I would personally enjoy a simulator built around something other than a fighter aircraft or attack helicopter (both of which I feel like have been done to death), I don't feel like market for such a product is very large. I think it needs to be something that's very "maneuvery", and probably it needs to be able to pew-pew. This rules out things like the SR-71 (challenging, but not very "maneuvery" flying) or SAR helicopters (not pew-pewy), which would be great fun for some of us, but not many others.

 

With that in mind, I'd like to humbly suggest the B-1B might make an excellent subject for the next DCS entry. Challenging, high-speed, nap-of-the-earth flying coupled with an awful lot of destructive potential. It'd also be a pretty unique sim experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I would personally enjoy a simulator built around something other than a fighter aircraft or attack helicopter (both of which I feel like have been done to death), I don't feel like market for such a product is very large. I think it needs to be something that's very "maneuvery", and probably it needs to be able to pew-pew. This rules out things like the SR-71 (challenging, but not very "maneuvery" flying) or SAR helicopters (not pew-pewy), which would be great fun for some of us, but not many others.

 

With that in mind, I'd like to humbly suggest the B-1B might make an excellent subject for the next DCS entry. Challenging, high-speed, nap-of-the-earth flying coupled with an awful lot of destructive potential. It'd also be a pretty unique sim experience.

 

 

http://www.microsoft.com/games/flightsimulatorx/

 

http://www.microsoft.com/games/flight/

.

 

i7 880 | HD 7870 | 8 Gb DDR3 1600 | ECS P55H-A | OCZ Vertex 2 180 | Intel 330 180 | WD 500 AAKS | 2x WD 2T Green | Enermax Liberty 620 | CH Combatstick & Throttle | TrackIR 3 | HP ZR24W | Windows 7 x64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With that in mind, I'd like to humbly suggest the B-1B might make an excellent subject for the next DCS entry. Challenging, high-speed, nap-of-the-earth flying coupled with an awful lot of destructive potential. It'd also be a pretty unique sim experience.

 

The problem with that is that (from what I understand) the guys at DCS are not interested in modeling aircraft that need more than one crewmember. A lot of people want the Apache, but there aren't any one-seat versions around. I'd imagine the pilot workload for a single dude sitting in a B-1 would be massive.

-SnakeShit

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Peace through Superior Firepower

 

EVERYTHING YOU'LL EVER NEED FOR LOMAC:

http://flankertraining.com/ironhand/news.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with that is that (from what I understand) the guys at DCS are not interested in modeling aircraft that need more than one crewmember. A lot of people want the Apache, but there aren't any one-seat versions around. I'd imagine the pilot workload for a single dude sitting in a B-1 would be massive.
Rather than not interested, they just still don't know how to best achieve it or maybe some technical issue.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

CM HAF-X | Corsair HX1000i | ASUS P8P67Pro | Intel Core i7 2600 @ 4.0GHz | Corsair CWCH70 | G.Skill 8GB DDR3 1600MHz | ASUS GeForce GTX 970 4GB | Plextor M5Pro 256GB | WD Caviar Black 1TB * 2 RAID 0 | WD Caviar Green 2TB | Windows 10 Professional X64 | TM HOTAS Warthog | Saitek Pro Flight Rudder Pedal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with that is that (from what I understand) the guys at DCS are not interested in modeling aircraft that need more than one crewmember.

 

Actually, the real problem is that it's a B-1B. It's the queen of the Air Force!

 

2116_1760_l.jpg

 

...... hangar queen.

 

Kidding aside I think a B-1 would actually be a pretty interesting aircraft to fly. Or crash.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the F/A-18 Super hornet would be cool. You should be able to find all the details and manuals on it that you need. You could even add a interesting twist to multiplayer by having a friend be the backseat guy.

Coder - Oculus Rift Guy - Court Jester

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, like I said - we know about NATOPS. I'm still questioning your statement:

 

You should be able to find all the details and manuals on it that you need.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D

I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor Wags... PM-Inbox has no Spam-Filter...

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F Gaming, Intel Core i7 9700k , 32gb Corsair DDR4-3200

Asus RTX 2070 super, Samsung 970 EVO Plus M2, Win10 64bit, Acer XZ321QU (WQHD)

TM HOTAS Warthog, SAITEK Rudder Pedals, TIR 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I left wags many personel messages to ask for how long they want to keep it a secret , but I got no response.

 

Sure you got a response, you just didn't get it. ;)

Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two.

Come let's eat grandpa!

Use punctuation, save lives!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, the real problem is that it's a B-1B. It's the queen of the Air Force!

 

2116_1760_l.jpg

 

...... hangar queen.

 

Kidding aside I think a B-1 would actually be a pretty interesting aircraft to fly. Or crash.

 

Why is the tail higher than the roof? This could end up with one or two technical difficulties. :smilewink:

Always remember. I don't have a clue what I'm doing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...