Witchking Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 I am so excited at the possibility of proper realistic landings. lol! WHISPR | Intel I7 5930K | Nvidia GTX980 4GB GDDR5 | 16GB DDR4 | Intel 730 series 512GB SSD | Thrustmaster WARTHOG | CH Pro Pedals | TrackIR4 pro | |A-10C|BS2 |CA|P-51 MUSTANG|UH-1H HUEY|MI-8 MTV2 |FC3|F5E|M2000C|AJS-37|FW190|BF 109K|Mig21|A-10:SSC,EWC|L-39|NEVADA| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cichlidfan Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 I am so excited at the possibility of proper realistic landings. lol! Until you use the brakes. ;) Landing will be much better but stopping, not so much. ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkateZilla Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 Im surprised no one has been able to mod in toe brakes assignment. Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team BIGNEWY Posted October 16, 2013 ED Team Share Posted October 16, 2013 not having toe brakes has always bothered me as well. Why have they never assigned axis for them ? Forum rules - DCS Crashing? Try this first - Cleanup and Repair - Discord BIGNEWY#8703 - Youtube - Patch Status Windows 11, NVIDIA MSI RTX 3090, Intel® i9-10900K 3.70GHz, 5.30GHz Turbo, Corsair Hydro Series H150i Pro, 64GB DDR @3200, ASUS ROG Strix Z490-F Gaming, HP Reverb G2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theGozr Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 The Fun part of a simulator is to actually do things that you wont really do in RL or in much more safe ways to ovoid material and life lost.. Aerobatics, position aircraft to critical air situations to the limits and to the actual controls lost , landing and take off, hardcore maneuvers during fights but this goes under limits and aerobatics.. That is what make interesting an aircraft under AFM ... for years SFM was never enough and I am very pleased that we are getting fast away from it. ;) Fly it like you stole it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Python Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 Until you use the brakes. ;) Landing will be much better but stopping, not so much. Yeah... Keep that nose high ;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blaze Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 not having toe brakes has always bothered me as well. Why have they never assigned axis for them ? SFM limitation at the code level. i7 7700K | 32GB RAM | GTX 1080Ti | Rift CV1 | TM Warthog | Win 10 "There will always be people with a false sense of entitlement. You can want it, you can ask for it, but you don't automatically deserve it. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frogisis Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 Really jazzed for this. Waiting for the AFM has been the big thing keeping me from fully getting into the Eagle and doing missions. For when it goes wrong: Win10x64, GTX1080, Intel i7 @3.5 GHz, 32GB DDR3, Warthog HOTAS, Saitek combat rudder pedals, TrackIR 5 / Vive Pro, a case of Pabst, The Funk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IonicRipper Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 been waiting for this as well. Finally going to add a fighter jet to my collection! i5 4590 @ 3.77GHz | GTX 1060 6GB | 16GB 1600MHz DDR3 | 1TB HDD+500GB HDD | Win10 Home X64 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leafer Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 (edited) I would not be so optimistic, they always take too long to develop something. I believe it will take about 2or 3 years to complete :( another reason for you not to get too excited about a date short, they often they abandon the project, not take seriously everything that is posted on forum ED also have this habit of not announcing features, actually everything they do, until they know it is set in stone. you must be new to the world dcs... read the forum and various topic how many things were promised, and how many things were accomplished some projects have fallen by the wayside If you've been around here as long as I think you have, nothing is ever promised here. There's also "Everything is subject to change." clause. :D Edited October 17, 2013 by leafer ED have been taking my money since 1995. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leafer Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 I think he meant that it is "alreasdy possible" on the in-development Su-27 AFM, not the current SFM. He'd still be struggling to pull off the cobra then, too. :P ED have been taking my money since 1995. :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMoose Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 Looks awesome :thumbup: Antec 900 gaming tower, PSU: Corsair 750W, Q6600, Asus P5K, 8Gig Mushkin, Nvidia eVGA 280 GTX Superclocked 1G DDR3, SSDNOW200 Kingston Drive, TrackIr 3000+Vector, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro joystick, Saitek rudder pedals pro, Sharp 42" inch LCD Aquo. OS: windows 7 64bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antorian Posted October 17, 2013 Share Posted October 17, 2013 Can't wait to kick the tires and light the fires in the new AFM. Windows 10 Intel Core i5 4670k CPU 3.4 GHz 16GB RAM MSI RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog TrackIR 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcdefend Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Which Sub Forum For F-15C Questions Which is the proper forum to post F-15C questions? I don't see one with that label. Thanks, John Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sslechta Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 Here you go dcdefend..... Welcome! F-15C falls under Flaming Cliffs. ED Forums » English » Flaming Cliffs » General Discussion Steve (Slick) ThrustMaster T.Flight Hotas X | TrackIR5 Pro | EVGA GTX 1070 | Win10 64-bit Professional | Dell Precision 7920 Workstation | 1 TB SSD | 128 GB Memory | Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 2.0 GHz 16 Core Processors (64 Total w/HT ON) | 24" Dell Monitor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
=Mac= Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 If it's in Beta, does that mean that FC3 has it in the latest update? I haven't flown the F-15 in a couple weeks, now. (It's that pesky Huey hogging all my flight hours! :) The Hornet is best at killing things on the ground. Now, if we could just get a GAU-8 in the nose next to the AN/APG-65, a titanium tub around the pilot, and a couple of J-58 engines in the tail... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sobek Posted October 19, 2013 Share Posted October 19, 2013 AFM doesn't mean avanced flight model for landings simulation and realism, the most important is how the aircraft performs in mid air than on the ground:P, how it accelerates, how it turns (deg./s) how fast it rolls (the Su-27 rolls faster than a real Flanker with SFM so it's not realistic), that's the real role of an AFM! Actually the SFM was already quite on the numbers in that regard. The real big differences to the AFM are dynamic behaviour, landing physics and edge of the envelope handling. Aircraft performance metrics won't change noticeably as, like i already mentioned, SFM covered those pretty well. Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sail Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 well technically nothing was promised, since the posts never contained "We promise" or "We are definitely making this" Your comment is childish men of character they honor their words not invent subterfuge to evade their responsibilities I agree with the voodoo he's right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pyromaniac4002 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 I would not be so optimistic, they always take too long to develop something. I believe it will take about 2or 3 years to complete :( another reason for you not to get too excited about a date short, they often they abandon the project, not take seriously everything that is posted on forum lol, 2 or 3 years to complete an advanced flight model that's already in beta testing? I have to say, I think you're airing pretty heavily on the negative nancy side. Can't wait to see the new and improved F-15C though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey45 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 either the 33 or the migs. The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LexiconG2 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 Just to confirm this will just be the FC3 version with the AFM not a DCS high fidelity version that's in beta testing? Dell XPS 8500 Modified 700 Watt PSU Windows 8 Pro MCE Intel I7 3770 3.8 GHZ TR (stock) 16GB DDR 3 PC12800 Gigabyte 760 OC 2.0GB 2x 2TB HD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate--IRL-- Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 Just to confirm this will just be the FC3 version with the AFM not a DCS high fidelity version that's in beta testing? Correct. Nate Ka-50 AutoPilot/stabilisation system description and operation by IvanK- Essential Reading Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harpoon Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 And then the F-16?;) Go play Falcon. If you want to talk to anyone about anything personal, send it to their PM box. Interpersonal drama and ad hominem rebuttal are things that do not belong on a thread viewed by the public. One thing i have to point out... naming a thread.. "OK, so" is as useful as tits on a bull. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilotasso Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 uncool reply [sigpic]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic4448_29.gif[/sigpic] My PC specs below:Case: Corsair 400C PSU: SEASONIC SS-760XP2 760W Platinum CPU: AMD RYZEN 3900X (12C/24T) RAM: 32 GB 4266Mhz (two 2x8 kits) of trident Z RGB @3600Mhz CL 14 CR=1T MOBO: ASUS CROSSHAIR HERO VI AM4 GFX: GTX 1080Ti MSI Gaming X Cooler: NXZT Kraken X62 280mm AIO Storage: Samsung 960 EVO 1TB M.2+6GB WD 6Gb red HOTAS: Thrustmaster Warthog + CH pro pedals Monitor: Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD Freesync HDR400 1440P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karambiatos Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 (edited) :doh:... when i was least expecting! I only want to buy a high fidelity flight model and have fun with the plane as a non-combat aircraft, otherwise for locking up something on radar and shooting a missile doesn't mean more than simply "Lock On", and that's not my passion! So it's gonna take a while until the AFM for FC3 fighters will be a DCS standard..., but i'm willing to wait for what's good! well its still not simply lock on, and it wont be that much different in DCS, since thats how it pretty much works. but there isnt anything quite like fumbling with switches, and playing with light intensity knobs. Edited October 20, 2013 by karambiatos A 1000 flights, a 1000 crashes, perfect record. =&arrFilter_pf[gameversion]=&arrFilter_pf[filelang]=&arrFilter_pf[aircraft]=&arrFilter_DATE_CREATE_1_DAYS_TO_BACK=&sort_by_order=TIMESTAMP_X_DESC"] Check out my random mods and things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts