GGTharos Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 This adjustment was to SARH missiles more so than to ARH, though both were tuned. Expect better chaff rejection for ARH. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilotasso Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 I hoped for that woot! [sigpic]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic4448_29.gif[/sigpic] My PC specs below:Case: Corsair 400C PSU: SEASONIC SS-760XP2 760W Platinum CPU: AMD RYZEN 3900X (12C/24T) RAM: 32 GB 4266Mhz (two 2x8 kits) of trident Z RGB @3600Mhz CL 14 CR=1T MOBO: ASUS CROSSHAIR HERO VI AM4 GFX: GTX 1080Ti MSI Gaming X Cooler: NXZT Kraken X62 280mm AIO Storage: Samsung 960 EVO 1TB M.2+6GB WD 6Gb red HOTAS: Thrustmaster Warthog + CH pro pedals Monitor: Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD Freesync HDR400 1440P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
44th Eagle Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 This adjustment was to SARH missiles more so than to ARH, though both were tuned. Expect better chaff rejection for ARH. Ghost, I didnt know ARH rejection was going to be better...good news. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GGTharos Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 In COMPARISON to SARH, ARH chaff rejection will be much better depending on aspect etc. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nscode Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 Shouldn't this all go in missile effectivnes thread ;) Use THA powa of mooove post, mr. moderator :) Never forget that World War III was not Cold for most of us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Scythe Posted February 10, 2006 Share Posted February 10, 2006 In COMPARISON to SARH, ARH chaff rejection will be much better depending on aspect etc. It doesn't matter. The basic problems are still there: chaff is most effective at low aspects and the seeker just goes blind if it gets beamed. Plus, there are no limitations to chaff in Lock On - the huge LOS rates it creates in the end-game are not modelled. If monopulse was truly modelled, PK would increase considerably in certain situations (notably in the no-escape zone, between 2 and 5 miles). So basically, radar missiles are modelled at their weakest and their countermeasures at their strongest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts