Jump to content

theOden

Members
  • Posts

    299
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by theOden

  1. Haha Snail, I see what you did there.
  2. Was planning on early Friday (15:00 SweTime style when updates usually go live) but got a customer meeting 14:30 - guess how focused I will be during that meeting.. Imagine the wonderful world of no customers! (yeah)
  3. Goes for both the Vigg Pilot and the receiving end in that autopilot mode :joystick:
  4. Oh yes, and I like Wags' mindset while flying - at least I think I hear his mindset - well focused and dedicated to the task at hand. Same in the live stream they just did. I start to think he's a simmer of my kind so my picture of Wags from a strict producer has moved up alot these last days (he's probably always been but it is new to me).
  5. Would love to see the SF37, by far the best looking one. (no, not an opinion - pure facts actually :) ) Once I was hoping for DCS modules to be family-trees, Like MiG-21 would contain bis, mf, pf etc. etc. and Viggen would be AJ SF SH JA and AJS since we pay a full simulator price for each module. This aint going to happen, but I can live with that.
  6. You really went from the beginning Werewolf1025. :) Great Day5 video, keep them coming. (for viewers, there was a plane between J29 Tunnan and J35 Draken, the hammer named J32 Lansen - did I say DCS:J-32 Lansen? naaa I didn't)
  7. One reason can be that the 05 is a supersonic "instant fire" weapon which you deploy as soon as you see the target even if far off your current heading (reasonable 30-44 deg off, not 90 :) ) while the Mav needs all that aiming we're all pretty used to. But for mission planning I'd say go 05 for bridges and structures and Mav for smaller "pinpoint" targets such as radar and similar (maybe even tanks/vehicles but keep in mind the AJ-37 is more of a striker like the Su-25 and not a CAS plane like Su-25T or A-10).
  8. add a mission command (F10 Other) and let that one do Unit.Destroy(). Otherwise pumping lots of env.info() into dcs.log textfile is a good way to track weird behaviour ingame. (I think I've read more log than played ingame the last weeks)
  9. Quite doable if you go insane on the db textfiles: We flew primarily ground strike missions for a while, good times it was.
  10. Yes, but this time also the canard flaps :P
  11. Maybe there's a reason for this?
  12. Feedback: I'd suggest the manual to be written for a english version cockpit also being default with the "correct" swedish cockpit one being optional in settings (that is putting the swedish label in paranthesis thoughout the manual). This based on the us horrible swedes far easier translates engrish to swedish compared to the masses doing it the other way around.
  13. Amen to that. I'd imagine the Hunter would attract alot of players since it was in use in almost every airforce in the world (yeah, slight exaggeration, but you get the picture :music_whistling: ) Edit: Just to be picky, the Tunnan had 4x20mm (same gun we put in the Pbv 302 APC/ICV later on) - Also it was the first user of Rb24 aka Aim-9B which we will see fall off the wings in AJS-37 late January.
  14. Yes, we flew some 160 of them. Flying the Mustang over water versus Soviet MiG-15's is fun :) (and when frustration hits in I switch to my MiG-15 in Swedish liveries faking J 29 Tunnan :) - not that have more success there anyhow) http://www.avrosys.nu/aircraft/Jakt/114j26/114J26.htm
  15. Do you assume or did you actually put a P-51D in editor for Sweden? Not listed in my DCS. I have other "full module" crafts available such as MiG-15 (my interim J29) but flying Swedish P-51's (J 26 as we call'em) has to be made using Ukraine faction as my current solution.
  16. If they could start off adding the P-51D to the Swedish faction I would be happy.
  17. Try removing ..\Saved Games\DCS\MissionEditor\setting.lua (it recreates itself) Do you keep your missions in different folders, could "last used" folder been removed (not sure how DCS reacts to such)?
  18. Do you have anything relating to this in ..\Saved Games\DCS\Logs\dcs.log? (it works fine for me)
  19. Actually, the RBS-15 MkIII is land attack capable so it might not be so far off :) (currently only ship based AFAIK but LN could maybe maybe maybe give us a "what-if-scenario" missile version)
  20. Bingo. I would say we now have the, by far, biggest Viggen fan onboard the hype train haha. Great to see you here Snail. Check PM :)
  21. Are you by any chance a horribly old Dutch e-pilot? :D /theOlden
  22. Good question, would be nice to hear a serious answer (compared to all clowns that showed so fast).
  23. Nope. What can be seen are ferry deliveries to Saipan.
  24. Great, been looking for this to be able to tossbomb a static SA-6 site. Too bad the weapons decide CCRP/CCIP and not the pilot, would prefer to CCRP toss a Mk20 cluster in their head over the Mk82. But I'll fight with what I've got, now I just need to understand this rather complex approach using offsets. :)
×
×
  • Create New...