Jump to content

jeventy26

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    65

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About jeventy26

  • Birthday 10/01/1979

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    Jet Fighter 2, Jane's USAF, Lock-On, DCS, Flight Simulator
  • Location
    Chicago
  • Interests
    Aircraft
  • Occupation
    Aerospace Planning/Scheduling

Recent Profile Visitors

1178 profile views
  1. jeventy26
    Here's a question for you ED. Are all current modules going forward protected? As in, do you have the source code so we don't end up in this situation (again)? If not, what source code are you missing?
  2. jeventy26
    If I told my boss, "Don't worry, if the vendor drops the ball, I have everything backed up," and then when it all falls apart I say, "Actually, I don't have anything," I'm getting lit up. No excuses. That’s not a miscommunication. That’s me giving false assurance and hoping no one notices until it’s too late. That’s exactly what this looks like. ED told us they’d have the files. That gave people confidence to buy. Now we’re being told they actually don’t have them, and it’s being shrugged off like it’s just legal nuance. If I pulled that stunt at work, I’d be updating my resume.
  3. jeventy26
    Still wondering if anyone has thoughts on this... because unless I'm missing something, ED did say they'd retain the files, and now we're finding out they don't. That's not a legal gray area, and unless I am missing something that seems like a broken promise to customers?
  4. jeventy26
    nullI think everyone is saying that ED told us that if the 3rd party can't support they would have the files... Does not look like that was true. So no, we don't have veto power... but you can see promises were made. ED has admitted they do not in fact have the files.
  5. jeventy26
    On the interactive map it does not show King Abdulaziz Air Base. AFAIK this was the largest Air base for US during 1991... but it is listed on the below static map. So is this planned or not?
  6. jeventy26
    Me. Id buy it on day one. I'd be more than happy to dogfight you in it
  7. jeventy26
    No. We just want a simple answer... Not a political one. "Where these used on our version we are getting?" -"No, but they could have so we are adding it." That's all I am asking for.
  8. jeventy26
    No kidding... At least not the version we have. The SU-27SM can though as it has a different radar. Doesn't the 9.12 we are getting use the N019 radar? AFAIK that can't support R-27ER. Not until the N019M. I am not pretending I know everything but isn't that correct? What's the difference?
  9. jeventy26
    Then why don't we add the R-77's to the SU-27/SU-33? Furthermore are all variants in FC3 going to be upgraded to "within the realm of possibility weapons"?
  10. jeventy26
    They are... Its the world map...
  11. jeventy26
    I think he's just asking if ED is bending the rules... not if we need to accept it or not. ED can you clarify if you are bending the rules or not?
  12. jeventy26
    Right? I've been wondering the same.
  13. jeventy26
    Ever since the Hawk... I thought ED said this wouldn't happen again. What's going to happen to the F-15E is no agreement is reached?
  14. jeventy26
    They use reflectors and/or not their normal stealth coatings during peacetime. In short, they mask their true stealth......
  15. jeventy26
    I see the 27ER on the list. But I thought that wasn't available on the 9.12A. Are we bending the rules or am I misinformed?
×
×
  • Create New...