VR Flight Guy in PJ Pants

Thank you, will try.

For sticks with thumb sticks, like STECS, which can map to axis, I find them too loose and can go way too fast to be precise. How should I config them to slow down? Thanks in advanced.

Yup, tried a couple of my own stuff, no abnormality found.

The Cockpit software updated, all the old user-made profiles/presets are not working at all. But it seems there are more profiles and more sims supported.

Same here. Actually the ONLY headset…

Eye-opening! But I don't mind "weaker" motor, for I am flying for fun, not for exercise.

Tagline: Why not both?TM Micro-review: The AB9 base shakes the most when the helicopter goes in or out of transition, it is quite intense (video idea), but I personally would not suggest to use it as a vibrator or something similar. F-16 "mode", which transforms the stick into a less expensive, powered MFSSB. The trick is the stick moves itself to the opposite direction to where you force the stick to while still registering your movement. Since my base is not yet on the side, I have tried this one. It is not that stiff, I am told it is a profile thing, but it is like hand wrestling with a pole on the ground which can slight move.

Humm...

This is enlightening. Thank you, mate.

If they can find the way to do F-35A, why not JA-37, JAS-39 and Rafael?

Sorry

May I add MiG-15, MiG-19P, MiG-21bis, C-101 and L39? I know the last one is still in use by Ukraine, and Syria.

Fair enough, I agree all of your points. I understand in many theatres, especially during the Cold War period of which I think ED should stick onto, the introduction of planes like, SP or MP, early F-14, F-16, MiGs and Mirages would be great fun and great use of the maps available. Just my £0.02

So, allow me to ask again, what is F-14B(U) shown in the Beyond video?

I have no problem with MiG-23 et al even thought I have no interest in it. May be I get mixed up or confused by myself. Some says that Red Force is so unbalanced when Blue side gets all the cool toys. There will be a full-fi F-15C (as if the FC version was not OP enough), Red Force only has the MiG-29A upcoming (with no disrespect here, this one is Zero Day to me), there should be a MiG-23/27 to balance things out. This is where my understanding goes away.

I understand some folks really want more red planes, a full-fi Su-27 would be like a poem (and all the variants please), but give us a MIG-23/27 when we are getting a F-15C and Tornado, enlightenment as I don't see the logic here.

Oh, I meant cargo, not cargo plane... We need all the assets we can get our hands on...no, I am not talking about War Thunder...

No wonder there were so many fire at the start of the video. Sorry folks who are actually affected by the fire over there.

As I said, flyable cargo could be a module some day.

Full-fi F-15C anytime. Just make sure they do the radar right. Then we can have the EX. As for the Fat Amy, I don’t care and glad ED is not making drones instead.

More info of what this upgrade is, please.

Not to mention things related to Bo-15, Australia and the trainer, a bunch of Chinese aircraft announced.Really no F-1M? What on earth is Drakken doing her? I like that one but heck, it may be AI only.

Any insight?

But looking at the top level forum, there are a lot of stuff missing.

Thanks