Jump to content

Malefic Rage

Members
  • Posts

    87
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Malefic Rage

  1. there used to be a full sized keyboard where each key was an LCD display, but it was like 2000$ and they only made a few of them...

     

    That was the Optimus. https://www.artlebedev.com/optimus/

     

    It was a successfully crowdfunded project that was mismanaged to oblivion then sold off to a company that got it to manufacturing but then sold only a handful for $2000 for some bewildering reason. They created smaller products and then did the exact same thing: created just a handful of units and sold them for something ridiculous.

  2. Right now I would go for an i5 7600K, a decent custom fan and a mild overclock to about 4.2 GHz. As someone mentioned before, DCS only uses two cores. While the new Ryzens are powerhouses, they are not quite as good at single-threaded performance which is what DCS benefits from most.

  3. Just FYI I've been considering the same thing. Most benchmarks show the 1060 6GB performing better than the 580 8GB and also cost slightly less. I don't think that 2GB will make much difference however if you use high resolution or multiple monitors, the 3GB/4GB options may may not provide you with much future-proofing. Especially if you like to use high texture detail.

  4. I'd say that unless heavily overclocking a custom fan would be best. A stock fan is adequate as it is designed to work with the included CPU however a custom fan will cool your CPU more effectively and much more quietly. Here is what I use be-quiet-pure-rock-cpu-cooler It keeps my Core i5 6600K cool at 4.5GHz overclocked however due to the 40 degree summers and the lack of ventilation in my room I had to reduce it to 4.2GHz to prevent thermal throttling.

  5. Personally, I'd just get a cheap 250 from any reputable brand and leave it at that. In the future you can easily move to a 500 just be imaging one disk to the other.

     

    I'm not sure how the DCS engine works internally but with most game engines the majority of loading time is taken by the pre-processing of game assets which is a CPU-intensive task so IMO a high-end SSD won't give you that much improvement. Once in-game any remotely decent SSD will provide sufficient bandwidth to stream data for the game engine to handle.

     

    Edit: Another reason not to bother buying expensive high-end models is that the primary benefit of the more expensive models (depending on manufacturer) is write longevity. For games, access is 99% read.

  6. Hello. I use a 290 with DCS 1.5 and with relatively high detail I get a minimum of 60fps and often over 100. Speed-wise the R9 290 is much closer to a GTX 970 than anything else. For its age it is a great choice. I can play every modern game on high detail at 1920x1200. For DCS, spend your money on a CPU with good single-thread performance such an overclockable i5.

     

    I noticed you have listed an i5 6400. If that is correct, I don't think they are overclockable. Only Intel CPUs with the K suffix are unlocked. You also need to pair it with a motherboard that has a chipset that supports overclocking. Intel are real S.O.B.s when it comes to locking things down to make you pay more. Any AMD CPU and be overclocked but unfortunately until the new architecture comes out, their CPUs are not suitable for DCS.

  7. I ended up biting the budget bullet and got myself some Saitek Pro Flight Pedals. I have to admit I'm pretty disappointed. They're loud and clanky, with a long foot like mine the hinge is too far back and there is so little resistance on the toe brakes that sneezing will cause them to depress.

     

    I took a look at some of the higher quality products and unfortunately between currency conversion, GST and international postage they would cost a fortune. Unfortunately it's all I had the cash for so it will do. On the bright side I now get to fly the KA-50 so ultimately it is still a win.

  8. For helicopters especially I guarantee you'll be disappointed with saitek pedals. (For planes they are acceptable since it's much less footwork).

     

    Don't let your excitement get the better of you. Wait a little longer until you can afford the something better.:thumbup:[/Quote]

     

    Yeah, I daresay that I will, especially with helicopters. Potentiometers are just too unresponsive for quick, subtle adjustments. The problem is that I either wait forever to get a decent set or make do with what I have. I suppose I could always start with the cheapies and sell them off eBay later. They usually go for a good price.

     

    It ticks me off since, given the cost of the X-52, I don't really see any reason they couldn't have put a better senor in some foot pedals.

  9. Hello folks. I'm going to get myself some rudder pedals soon. For my budget it will be either the new Thrustmaster units or the Saitek Pro Flight. Originally I had just planned to get the Saitek but since the Thrustmaster pedals came out I thought I'd look into them. I haven't heard much about the them so I was wondering if anybody had any experience with it? Is the build quality any good? What is the accuracylike? Can you adjust tension like the Saitek unit? The pedals look a bit close together compared to the Saitek as well.

     

    Thanks.

  10. Hello. You have a fairly low-spec system however I would say the foremost the CPU is the biggest bottleneck. Since DCS is primarily single-threaded the number of cores on the CPU doesn't matter much. The current generation of AMD CPUs have poor single-thread performance so even the best of them will keep you down, even with an overclock. That was my experience. After upgrading to a Core i5 6600K I ended up with 100 fps.

     

    edit: The new generation of AMD CPU coming out soon is supposed to have substantially better single-core performance however you'd have to wait for it to come out.

     

    Secondly the 750Ti is pretty old and slow now. I would suggest either a Radeon 390, Radeon 480, GeForce GTX 970 or Geforce 1060 for a mid-range card with good DCS performance.

     

    As for PSU, I have gotten by with a 500W Antec unit for many years now. Since modern CPUs and GPUs use less power, you are unlikely to need more unless you want to get some pretty beefy hardware.

     

    Hope it help.

  11. Hi there. Your 970 is fine. I use an older Radeon R9 290 which gives similar performance and can get 100fps+. The biggest improvement came when I upgraded my CPU to a core i5 6600K and overclocked it to 4.2GHz. My suggestion is to first try staying with your current CPU, buy a decent air cooler and see if you can get an overclock to about 4Ghz. I'd also recommend a total of 16GB RAM because as Mammatus said, DCS is quite a resource hog. If that doesn't give you an improvement then look at a CPU upgrade.

     

    Hope it helps.

×
×
  • Create New...