Yes, I agree that if Leatherneck can't find a document that conclusively proves that this capability existed or it isn't modelled precisely how it should be, then the feature _must_ be pulled or it will _jeopardise_ everything we're paying for. /s
Not to be a smarty-pants, but based on the fact that they have doubtless the most comprehensive set of reference materials ever gathered on the aircraft, they have implemented features appropriate to the capabilities of said aircraft.
There is no requirement for LS to 'prove' that such a feature existed, just as they don't have to show up with their original 3d scan data and use that to 'prove' the shape of Bolt#3123323 holding the #32 Main Strut to the #3 Transverse strut.
