Carl_infar

U can deceive yourself as much as u want that the dcs f 35 will be within shouting distance to the actual one. It ll be exact same fantasy extrapolation as j20 could be. So personally I'd fly both those fantasies

So generally on similar level as f35 will be: Guesswork, advertisement fantasies & anecdotal (restricred by goverments) testimonies . Of course u can belive what u want but practically it will be as described above

As we are getting now a F35 with FM based on fluid dynamics, airshow data, anegdotal pilots memories/feelings. Systems at least in some part based on prodcuers advertisment plus the guesstimations. (same goes for the rcs) Could we get a J20 based on similar guesstimations? I get that the SU57 due to ED being partly Russia based is not possible, but as non of the ED is china based (DEKA is 3rd part not ED itslef) there shouldnt be issues related to that.

im sorry but this is a crap solution. For me its the first time that a dev who sells modules for 80 bucks in order to solve the problem asks the clients to whitelist files or even whole folders... Id understand if this would be some modded free stuff but it isnt.

I'm Sorry mate. You'll get me next time.

+1 Anyway during the cold war due to the threat of the SAMs, the fight was taken to low alt. Also specialized planes like tornado, viggen etc were introduced for low level attack. So there's nothing wrong with low level flying...

I understand Your point. I have only doubts if the effect will be as desired. Currently every one if he wants can easyly coordinate via in game chat. If this is not common i doubt if switching to forced srs will improve it (all who want are using srs already...). Anyway everybody is playing for fun in their own free time the way he likes best. Most just wants to do ""furballing'' (personally I started with A to A only and currently its more like 50/50 between AtoA and AtoG) On the other hand enforcing 3rd party program can by a problem especially for the new dcs players or old dcs but new to mp. To sumarise : will enforcing SRS improve the coordination? Idoubt it. If one wants can easyly coordinate now… Will it lower the players numbers? - highly likely

and also everything is visible on F10 map real time

Hi Alpen, in the mission which is currently running (phone booth if I remember right) when you press f10 all the assets and planes are visible on the map real time

Hi, today ED released a patch which includes also some changes to servers/MP so the server is not showing on the list

i also dont see it

With the rear aspect only missiles is so much fun, You have to actually manuver/dogfight and not only point the nose in the general direction of the contact. The older machines like Mig 15, Saber ,Mig 19 have actually a chance to fight the tiger, mig21and Viggen. Also Choppers have at least a chance to defend themselves.

The Answer is both Yes and no: 1)Yes both of them lock and turn and dive to engage it 2) no -they cant destroy it because it sits just a bit too low in water and they overfly it and rb04 hits the water just behind it rb15 climbs and autodestructs. they dont have the proximity fuses so dont go off. Another scenario could be to make night mission where viggens had to find it , deploy lysbombs to light the area and destroy it with gunpods.

no problem if the boat is on the sea or big lake (fog and rain have no significant impact) if it was to be placed on the river it could be difficult

1) server by default just removes all the weapons that cant be used like r60s Ms so You dont have to be "carefull" while equiping them 2) You are aware that the Mig 21 rearaspect only R60s are allowed (which external look is I think same as R60Ms). the all aspect R60Ms are not allowed.

Hi, I've just checked (placed a armed speed boat on the sea) and it can.

I think its quite common with those maps. for example I also dont have the nevada but i do have the gulf map

this might be it. Before when we were using all aspect RB74 with bigger warhead You needed mostly just one, very rarely 2 to bring the Mig 21 down. Now with smaller warhead RB24J, You need in most cases 2 and very rarely 1. For Su25 You still need mostly just 1 RB24...

its not that bad with Mig 21. Its a bit more resistant than i remember , but as per my late experience (including todays one) it needs usually 2 missiles. I don't remember been forced to lunch the 3ed one from viggen to shoot the 21 down, although in 80% cases 1 miisile is not enough to have it instantly down. Anzway I hope they will look into it

+1 I also like it very much. I dont have much free time and this server has the right amount of dogfight and ground attack missions which are just at the right difficulty level p.s. removing the AWACS would be a bad decision

+1

Some of us might be just tired with "i tell you story of my life" or ''hold my hand'' guys and really enjoy the fact that nobody is forcing anybody to be on live comms if they in current moment dont want to for coordination short written massages are also enough. anyway, everybody has his own ''poison'' and shouldn't force others to do things they in current moment dont want

Alpen, thanks for the command and conquer mission -It was so fun to hide form the fast movers in chopper and stalk the armor. I hope for even more missions for choppers.