Huilque151

yes!! i saw the 2003 pictures!! your material its gold.

good observation!

Looks like the default "HQ static object" from ED library. thanks for the info!

AWESOME WORK! AWESOME WORK! didn't included because i was not pretty sure about the info related to this building on the ODS attacks, thanks for shared! I will included this info and pictures to my PDF.

AWESOME WORK! tank for shared!

I have added it to the initial report on page one, including several photographs of the moment, but I have prioritized the approach of creating a new post with more information about some of these POIs in importance for the gameplay from my point of view, I will surely dedicate a post to it. What worries me now and I want to be honest is that ED (Nineline or anyone else) has not given any positive or negative feedback other than they will "review" the information, which they posted 1 month and a half ago. ( i think its important to continue this effort and i tell u why) I started this Topic because looking at the map and reading the posts of other users and nineline, I saw that some customers were complaining about the few areas of detail of relevance and I also saw that ninelines asked them for patience and for us to indicate what the POIs are for us, because of that i started this work and Well, here there are POI with luxury and detail, images, exact locations, history and relationship with current conflicts, which would help a lot to make a difference between a map for MSFS and a map for DCS. The truth is I'm a little discouraged by the lack of feedback without considering that it's been almost 2 months since the map was released without any news or new update, the patience that goes hand in hand with trust is created based on communication.

thanks a lot for this information! i will be the main info for recreat this mission for sure.

@NineLine Hi men! I hope it's very good!! Friend, have you had time to look at the document? In addition to that, this topic was delved into at the IRAQ nuclear research center, perhaps the most important point of interest in all of IRAQ. He has already appeared in several videos by big Youtubers. Please tell me, if this work and the one I am continuing is interesting for the map development team, it would be a great motivation to continue collecting information and images of other points of interest. PD: in the Next post will going in deep of The Al-Mamoun Solid Rocket Motor Production Plant related to the production of ballistic missiles launches from SCUD. A huge target!!!

Thank u bro!

1. - ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT OF INTEREST: The Al Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center The Al Tuwaitha Nuclear Research Center, located 18 km southeast of Baghdad, was the main site for the Iraqi nuclear weapons program. Al Tuwaitha facilities cover over one square kilometer and included two research reactors (Osiraq and IRT-5000), a fuel fabrication facility, facilities for plutonium separation, uranium enrichment and other purposes. The Osiraq reactor was bombed by Israel in 1981 and the IRT-5000 research reactor was bombed by the U.S. during the Gulf War. Other facilities were damaged or destroyed during the Gulf War. Additional facilities at Al Tuwaitha were damaged or destroyed during Operation Iraqi Freedom and subsequent looting. Most distinctive buildings: Osiraq Reactor ( Tammuz-1): The French had agreed to supply a 40 MWth MTR reactor called Tammuz-1 or Osirak, a zero-power reactor called Tammuz-2, a materials testing hot laboratory (named LAMA), workshops, and a radioactive waste treatment station (named RWTS) IRT-5000 nuclear reactor building 13: The IRT reactor. This facility also contained offices for the physics and chemistry departments. An extension in front of the reactor building was completed in about 1970 to house the new IBM mainframe computer which was installed in 1973, and to house part of the Physics Department. The reactor was upgraded in 1978 to 5 megawatt-thermal. Okay, let's get it straight. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I think the first thing that makes this place very characteristic is its defenses built on giant mounds of earth. Furthermore, it requires pilots to carry out very well-planned use of weapons, by other hand i could say that the Tammuz-1 reactor is the most important and iconic building in historical and cinematic terms inside the complex. We have already been able to see the videos of Grim reapers Bombing this reactor in their Operation Opera video, perhaps the first video made on the new map of Iraq. Also this building its particularly different and unique (Important for 80´s visual bombing). I will add a sequence of images that shows the place where both reactors were, in addition to images where you can see drawings and diagrams of the Tammuz-1 reactor building and real images of what it looks like today. i so sorry at this moment i dont have images of IRT-5000 Reactor. If somebody have pictures, please shared. Finally i will shared the images of others building around the Tammuz-1 reactor like the radioactive waste treatment station named RWTS, (ID 1, 2, 3 red numbers) I will continue on the next post. Sources: https://isis-online.org/isis-reports/detail/development-of-the-al-tuwaitha-site-what-if-the-public-or-the-iaea-had-over/9 https://www.nti.org/analysis/articles/iraq-nuclear/ https://www-ns.iaea.org/downloads/rw/projects/iraq/documentation/wm07paper.pdf Operation Opera F-16 Hud tape:

yes sir! actually i already a member. I waiting the file tu put the AB on the map and replaced the Normandy map with the iraq map jejej thanks regards!

@NineLine Hi bro, i hope the F-35 discussion get cold! Man, Have you been able to see or share my document attached to the beginning of the thread? greetings

Leyendo los comentarios, desde mi opinion personal creo que se debe aumentar la diversidad de REDFORCE de 3 y 4 ta gen antes de pensar en REDFORCE MODERN: MIG-25 FF MIG-23 FF SU-24 FF Ya que tenemos BLUE FORCE ( F/A-18C, F-16C, F-15C/E) para combatir esa REDFORCE. Por otrol lado aumentar a la par los S2A system con sistemas de mediano a largo alcance Chinos o el desarrollo del S-350, que inicio operaciones el 2009 ( dentro del periodo de la decada de los 2000; al igual que F-16C block 50, F/A-18C 2007, F-15C anunciado entre 2000 y 2010). En lo ideal aumento de unidades navales de otros paises de la REDFOR. desde mi punto de vista el F-35 abre la puerta a la 5ta GEN pero creo que antes de construir una arquitectura de sistemas y ambiente para misiones 5ta gen se debe poder haber hecho lo mismo con 3-4 gen.

Dont Worry dude! It must be a crazy day for you, you had a lot of action today! I'm encouraged and I would love to be someone who knows the F-35 well enough to be able to share data, if I know friends who have spent years reading about the plane. Greetings! Could you see my post and PDF about POI in IRAQ MAP / DESERT STORM ??? I know this week is crazy for you, please tell me if you have been able to see it, much success with the new projects!

Hello ED, first of all the 2025 & Beyond video was incredible, the DCS cinematics are getting better every day, the F15C Announcement was what I expected even though I didn't see it coming! and the announcement of the F35 wow!! But a few seconds after the excitement, doubts begin. For those of us who have read the Forum, we have constantly read that more technical and public information is needed for the development of some "WISHLIST" aircraft. As a result of that, many of us thought, Well! It seems ED is very responsible in carefully filtering the information, for us that assumed by us, it is a consolation that ED does the right thing although we cannot have the modern modules that we expect but we will have a more realistic full fidelity Simulator that we can have outside the military world and that would be above others like WT. The presentation of the F-35 creates this great doubt, especially when the methods of how the information will be obtained are reported. start the questions? Will DCS develop modules based on public documents from unofficial sources? If so, why not EA-18G Prowler? An S-400? an F/A-18E? because there are many open source articles from unofficial media and they are very good, surely enough to start a project. And another question perhaps the most worrying, ED has decided to make ¿Realistic modules or the most realistic that we can access as civilians?, because there is not much competition, so make a module with very little information or with gaps, which results in a module far from what it tries to represent even that can result in the "The most realistic thing there is in the civil environment." Finally, when forum users talk about the standard, they are referring to this, and as the word says, the "standard" should not change according to the project, if it does not stop being a standard. I hope you don't take my post wrong, I'm not a heater, it's just that there are a lot of doubts, but I'm sure that ED knows all this and that they will professionally address these challenges. I wish you the best in this gigantic project!! I wouldn't expect it before 2030 so I see it far from the horizon and I'm not always worried, especially if it allows us to experience the capabilities of a 5th generation module and not a 3D model of a 5th generation aircraft without the capabilities that make it a 5th gen. Regards!!!