AMVI_Rider Posted May 2, 2014 Posted May 2, 2014 (edited) I was investigating the db_weapons_data.lua file to check some details when I stopped in front of the definition of LAU-68/131 in TER (any kind of rocket): CLSID = "LAU_131x3_HYDRA_70_M151", ... displayName = _("LAU-131*3 - 7 2.75' rockets M151 (HE)"), ... Count = 21, Weight = 702, ... I found it to be too heavy compared to its single launcher configuration: CLSID = "{69926055-0DA8-4530-9F2F-C86B157EA9F6}", ... displayName = _("LAU-131 - 7 2.75' rockets M151 (HE)"), ... Weight = 100, Then I did some research for the real data: LAU-131 fully loaded with M151: 223 lbs (101 kg) LAU-131 empty: 68lbs (31 kg) M151: 23 lbs (10 kg) ... but I wasn't able to find the BRU-42LS specs then I took it from DCS: BRU-42LS: 143 lbs (65kg) The math: LAU-131 = 68 + 23 *7 = 229 lbs (104 kg) LAU-131*3 = 229 * 3 + 143 = 830 lbs (376 kg) The first one is confirming DCS data for the single launcher configuration while the second one, as expected, is quite different. Am I missing something? Later on I also found dubious drag figures for some weapons i.e. : - LAU-105 with and without AIM-9: The empty drag is greater than the 2 missile configuration that it's (properly) greater than the 1 missile configuration. - {BRU-42_3*Mk-82AIR} vs {60CC734F-0AFA-4E2E-82B8-93B941AB11CF}: Mk-82AIR drag is 1/5th of Mk-82 In the respect of drag It's hard to find real world data with the exception of this: http://www.dsto.defence.gov.au/publications/1988/DSTO-TR-0545.pdf Edited May 3, 2014 by AMVI_Rider typos [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Author of DCSMP and VRK Ryzen 5 3600X - 32GB DD4 3200C14 Win10 64 - Geforce GTX 1080Ti Hotas Warhog + Virpil T-50 base - Saitek Combat Rudder Pedals - Cougar MFCDs - Custom head tracker 35" UWQHD main display + 22" MFCD/Helios display / Rift S 2x256 GB SSD - 2Tb Caviar Green
Recommended Posts