Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I got the feeling that the Sukhogruz does seem to "deflect"/mislead AIM-9X just as easily as other non focal-plane seeker IR missiles.

 

I do not think this is correct, focal plane seeker IR missiles should be much more robust against DIRCM systems.

Lincoln said: “Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."

Do not expect a reply to any questions, 30.06.2021 - Silenced by Nineline

Posted

Agreed, FPA seekers track targets based on multiple factors such as size and energy distribution. And such a simple method of DIRCM is really only effective against rather quite outdated IR tracking technology. When they were developed IR seekers were of the AM spin scan type. Such a device was devastating to these seekers.

 

 

z8DoU9R.png

 

 

Hec there is a study that I read that the effectiveness of a single flare (as in 1 flare) against these early seekers could range from 90-99% depending on range and aspect (the longer the flare remained in the FOV the chance of a break lock increased exponentially)

 

However with the development of FM conical scan seekers these tools were no longer as effective as they once were,

 

 

jWxsKLr.png

 

 

 

I bet it just acts like a "flare" and there is a raw chance that any IR missile just looses track somewhere in the code.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...