RLSinCO Posted June 13, 2022 Posted June 13, 2022 (edited) I've seen many, MANY posts regarding VR performance. Some from users with systems that should handle VR just fine (even with the AH-64D). This is a good way to baseline your system performance. It could be we are experiencing a coding bug, but I recommend you start with this site; download their free utility and see how your system compares with thousands of others with the exact same PC components as you. If you score below, or way below expected performance benchmarks in any particular area such as CPU, video, ram, ssd (not too needed for VR, but useful to know to load DCS or other real world apps), etc. then you know where to start to begin troubleshooting: Home - UserBenchmark Look near the top for the free download to begin your system benchmark. For anyone curious, you can see my system results here: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B17) Performance Results - UserBenchmark Note that my CPU is doing well, graphics card is doing really well, so is RAM, but my SSDs are not, but that is not a big factor in VR rendering. I have great performance in almost all modules, except for the Apache, however turning Textures down to medium gave me back good performance. My system specs for reference: I9-9900K MSI Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon MB 32GB DDR4 3200 ram (XMP enabled) EVGA FTW3 Ultra 3080 (10GB) Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe M.2 SSD 2TB (Note: performing way below expectations) Adata SX8100NP 2TB (Note: performing way below expectations) I'm going to see if I can't get my SSDs to perform better in the meantime, but I doubt that will increase FPS in VR much. That being said, I get pretty good VR performance using HP Reverb G2 headset in the Apache. Good luck! Edited June 13, 2022 by RLSinCO
Recommended Posts