Jump to content

Difference between 50 ppd and 57 ppd


Recommended Posts

Posted

Years ago i had an Oculus Rift for flying in DCS, but real life had other plans.

At this moment i want to make the jump again to VR in DCS.

I have a couple of VR in my mind.

Somnium VR1, Big Screen Beyond 2 and the Pimax Crystal Super.

 

I noticed Pimax Crystal Super has 2 versions: 57 ppd and tge 50 ppd.

 

Both have a resolutions of 3840x3840x2 with refresh rate of 72 Hz / 90 Hz.

 

The only difference i found was the fov.

The 50 ppd has a fov of 135 degree and the 57 ppd has a fov of 120 degree.

Is the difference of 7 ppd noticable and worth of in- or decrease of fov?

 

 

 

 

Asus ROG Crosshair X870E Hero | Ryzen 9 9950X3D  | G.Skill DDR5 Trident Z5 64GB | Samsung 9100 PRO m2 4TB |

ASUS Astral RTX 5090 LC | TM AVA | TM Viper TQS | TM TPR pedals | 

WinWing Super Taurus | WinWing TopGun MIP | TrackIR 5 | Windows 11 

Posted (edited)

There are estimates that 60ppd is retina quality, so the closer you are to that, the better the resolution.  Even Pimax says this decision is up to the user what matters more 1) increased FOV or 2) near-retina-quality.  I went for the latter (57ppd) since XRNeckSafer/eye tracking will offset any loss of FOV, for the most part, but nothing offsets for a fixed lower resolution.  I used to have the HP Reverb G2, so basically more than doubling the PPD and adding FOV will help my VR experience.

It's really what you prioritize for your VR flying experience.

Edited by Dawgboy
  • Thanks 1

The only time you have too much fuel is when you're on fire.
=============================
AMD 9950X3D CPU, 96Gb RAM// NVIDIA 5090 // SSD only // VKB STECS Mini+ Throttle / TM Warthog FCS / MFG Rudder Pedals / Physical Cockpit // TrackIR or VR// Win11 Pro 64bit //

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...