Poor perfomance

[Mav87th]

Short test for me yesterday - Clearly a lot of graphical performance problems for the corsair compared to other WWII modules.

 

Tested on the WWII Marianas map i had all my WWII prop planes as client on Saipan. Very poor VR performance there. However when i moved the planes to Tinian the performance was much better, though still not good.

 

Going to test on other maps later today

[TheRedPanda]

I have the same issue, performance is much worse than all other warbirds. Lower frame rate and stutters sometimes 

[Qcumber]

I did a performance test the other day. Here is a brief summary of my results. I will publish the full results later. 

• Flying over Guam at 1500ft.
• F4U mean 56 FPS, frame interval 18 ms
• P-51 mean 64 FPS, frame interval 15.8 ms
• Quantitative difference: 8 FPS and 2.2 ms frame interval in favor of the P-51.
• Qualitative (subjective) difference, negligible as both were below the 72Hz headset refresh

I need to do more tests: both planes over Caucasus, Normandy and Syria.

Settings: VR with VD Godlike and no QVFR. DCS mainly on maximum; does not really matter as both were the same, but I'll post full details when I release the full results; I will also include results when using QVFR. 

[Sparc]

I’m running a psvr2 with DFR eye tracking. My GPU frame times with other warbirds are low around 3ms at most. With the Corsair GPU frame times are low but CPU frame times jump all over the place. 
 

i7 12700kf

4070ti

32 ram 3200

2tb nvme

1tb ssd