Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, built-in videocards can generate a lot of problems, as they are usually not gaming-grade. Only about 5-10% of notebooks are suitable for gaming and they not come cheap, one of the reasons - good videocard inside.

WBR, =FV=BlackDragon.

logo3435.gif[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
Well, built-in videocards can generate a lot of problems, as they are usually not gaming-grade. Only about 5-10% of notebooks are suitable for gaming and they not come cheap, one of the reasons - good videocard inside.

 

but the thing is it ran on her system which is as basic as you can get..

 

I will report back with the new system

Posted

Well, there is no linear relationship of whether a basic system will have success or not. Basically, in the GPU department, there a lot of variation between various budget alternatives, with some basically being a normal card as far as capabilities and features go, but just so few cores and pipes and low bandwidth that they do not perform for games. These will be able to launch the games, most of the time, but you'll have horrible framerates. Other budget cards and integrated GPUs will be more "specialized" on 2D stuff and showing videos and might not have real programmable cores at all - and therefore any application that expects to use those functions in DirectX will simply not work at all.

  • Like 1

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер

Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog

DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules |

|
| Life of a Game Tester
  • 3 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...