Leaderboard

Code wise it is a flyable ;) It does not appear because there is no cockpit for it. AI aircraft will, if set to flyable(the HumanCockpit thing), be assigned a default cockpit(that of the Su-27), whereas flyable entities have seperately named cockpit shapes assigned to them....and as mentioned above the Su-25TM is code wise a flyable aircraft :) . Yes :) As mentioned above, you need to provide correctly named cockpit files for it. In the ...\lockon\bazar\world\shapes folder, make copies of the Su-25T cockpit files("kabina-su-25t.cmd" and "kabina-su-25t-glass.lom"), rename the copies to "kabina-su-39.cmd" and "kabina-su-39-glass.lom" respectively and put them back into the above mentioned folder. Then fly the Su-25TM....you will not be able to use the radar guided ASMs though(no radar routine modelled). - JJ.

.....and they have the inflight refuelling capability :) Yes and I believe they split their order between "Su-30MKM"s and the F/A-18Es - in the same way they did earlier with the MiG-29SD/F-18. Incidently the MiG-29M2 was a contender to the Su-30MKM and F/A-18E for that tender - hence the reason why the MiG-29M2 was seen at MAKS-2001 with the "MRCA" painted on its tailfins :) - JJ.

Главное не численность группы , а стабильность налета!!!:) На тебя РИММ уповаем!:)

Check this link for lots of pics. http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=53812

Who ever said you couldn't change my opinion? Or I've ever claimed perfection? But I do have to bring up the context in which the Vikhr missiles shots are made. In narrow circumstances it can be effective especially against A-10s and Su-25Ts 1stly the targeted A-10s and Su-25Ts are never going 800 kmh and it is incorrect to weigh effectiveness on relative speeds that are completely out of range for normal operations. 2ndly the Twisting and turning that A-10s and Su-25Ts is practically non-existant. At one point or another coming out of the 5G turn has to happen for these planes and at a low speed. And a helicopter can rotate at a rate that makes any A-10 and Su-25T at the exit point a fat and juicy target - travelling flat and straight and level for the most part as you stated. Anything other than a 3 or 9 o'clock exit point and the A-10s and Su-25Ts are good targets. 3rdly A-10s and Su-25Ts are not fast movers and are more like helicopters than Su-27s especially against a high-speed Vikhr. Don't over-estimate the speed value of a plane merely because it has wings. The targeted A-10s and Su-25Ts are built tough because speed is not their defence. I assume that the reason there are missiles with Radar and IR seekers is due to the BVR capabilitites of the radar and the ability to discern high differential of signal for the IR seekers. In the narrow circumstances of a very close range strike(which we are talking about), the visual is now useful - see the Helmet mounted sight the Russians have and the Americans will have. And at a very close range, range limitations are unimportant. So I ask. I ask the questions because I want them answered not for only "perfect" conditions but for all conditions. A developer will try to answer my questions and we'll have a better sim.