Pöri

Could make FC3 style MiG 31. Only front seat playable, rear seat full automatic radar operator pilot. There would be an F14 style menu that Heatblure uses for the F 14. Only the Zaszlon radar should be done without secrets much like the FC3 Su 27 radar and use the R 33, R 40, R 60 missiles in the game. Could produce Su 30 FC3 style and RVV SD and same weapons like in game SU 30 use (RVV SD = buff R77 to 110km without violating any secrets) only the front seat can be played, the rear seat is fully automatic radar and weapon handling operator. It would make a GUI menu like the one on the F 14. It would make the N011M bars radar like FC3 Su 27 radar and with these two options would silence those who are tired of such a question every day for 10 years! Ask for $ 60 this pack! Take it seriously, opinion? Sorry bad english!

J 11A same air to air missiles like Su 30MKK! J 11A get MFI 55, N001VE only 5 km away worse locking range than N001VEP! J 11A use same air to grund weapons like Su 30MKK! I dont undertand why get Su 30MKK... Real solution platforms use R 33, R 33S, R 33E, RVV SD, R 37, R 37M, RVV BD! Real solution to better than crap R 27ER and lucky R 27ET shots and crap R 77 only 10 - 15 km no escape zone vs noob pilots lucky kills. F 16 - FA 18 - F 14 pilots watching you datalink 100+ km, use TWS + AMRAAM shot without RWR alert and turn out the air combat. This is the problem!

I love flanker and wanted to help the developers. You could do it like Flanker without simulating a lot of secrets. Datalink would work too I just don’t want a $ 15 fighter to be better than $ 60- $ 80! I'm sad! You could also do an active radar head R27, R 27EM shouldn't have been taken out of the game, no one wanted to. The game would be much more playable. Everyone knows there won’t be a modern Flanker in the game. Whether you make a clickable cabin for your current MiG 29 or Su 27 will have the same bad missiles on it. It’s hard for developers to care about or hate Flanker lovers, we have a one-sided disadvantage online servers! Sorry bad english!

I will not give it because it is strongly opposed to all sorts of options for Flanker and MiG to evolve! No peer to peer datalink multiplayer, No R 27P and R 27EP and weak MiG 29 radar! https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=268058&page=4 Sorry! I love Flanker and MiG! :)

Interesting info Aim 120D! Apparently the main difference between AIM-120D and previous versions is guidance logic and loft profile. Using properly the energy available in the fuel is not easy and the range increase due to launches at high altitudes and speeds is impressive:

The first news about passive radar homing versions of their AAMs that could home down the pencil beam of a enemies fighter radar... for instance for a Sparrow to have any chance of a kill then the launch aircraft (say F-15) needs a lock on the target before launch and all the flight time of the missile to impact... an R-27EP could use its much greater launch range than any model Sparrow, and also much higher average flight speed to hit the F-15 before the Sparrow hits its target... and do it totally passively. The first news about such a missile was revealed well after it was in operational service (ie 20 years after). The R-27 missile, produced by Ukrainian firm Artem, comes in infrared-homing (R-27T), semi-active-radar-homing (R-27R), and active-radar-homing (R-27AE) versions. Russian firms still supply some components for R-27 missile.The R-27R has a range of 50-60 kilometers while R-27EM, which is likely to be used on MiG-29K, is a naval variant with a range of up to 170 kilometers under optimal conditions.The R-27Ps seeker head is interchangeable with the R-77s. According to the PLAF : The missile is guided to the target by a combination of different methods to provide reliable target lock-on at long ranges from the carrier aircraft. Initially the missile is guided by inertial guidance, with radio midcourse correction command. In its final stage of flight, the missile switches to semi-active radar-homing mode, or active infrared-homing mode depending on the type of the seeker. The missile can be guided along special trajectories to create favourable conditions for homing head and proximity fuse operation. It is also capable of going around a plume of passive jamming, of being moved out of the main lobe of the platform's radar, and approaching a low-flying target from above at a given angle. The R-27EP (AA-10 Alamo-F) missile has ARM capability and a range of 110 kms. The R27EP uses the 9B 1032 passive anti radiation seeker developed by CKBA. This operates at centimetric wavelengths, and guides the round to the radar of enemy fighter aircraft. The seeker is not different technologically from the Kh-31PD and Kh-38UShKE passive seekers since the developer is the same. The difference is that R-27EP1 has no inertial gyro system. So, the range of the missile and lock on range - both must to be 110 km from frontal hemisphere (for fighter with radar). However, for targets like AWACS it could be different, but is not important since the propulsion is limited by 110 km only.The seeker is a broad band, working in 1.2 - 11 GHz . So, the fighters with AESA radars cannot escape either. Say an F-15 detects a Mig-29 and immediately launches a Sparrow missile to intercept it... the Mig pilot can lock on an launch an R-27EP that tracks the radar signal from the F-15 painting the Mig and then launch their missile and turn... the large rocket motor of the EP gives it a higher flight speed than the Sparrow so unless there is a very long delay the R-27 should hit the F-15 before the Sparrow hits the Mig. If the F-15 spots the incoming missile and breaks their radar lock to manouver then both missiles will likely miss. They were in service in the 1990s yet kept secret all the 1990s. AFAIK they could not be used against ground targets... The homing head R-27P1 includes a combination of active radar and inertial correction system. These nodes are activated alternately depending on the phase of flight. The target designation of the missile receives from the radars of the carrier aircraft or ground-based radar. The control system operates according to the “let-forget” principle, ensuring the information secrecy of the attack. Su-34 armed with a R-27P1 / R-27EP1 AAM with passive guidance Details here: http://eng.ktrv.ru/production/military_production/air-to-air_missiles/r-27p1_-_r-27ep1.html

Read please, interesting! If we talk about combat (BVR) or beyond visual range the SU-30MK2 first detected the F 16 but affordable range of BVR both SU-30MK2 and F 16 is 130km course not shoot one BVR his greater reach BVR broader FACH is the AIM-120 AMRAAM C-7 130km is fire and forget although it has created a myth the AIM-120 AMRAAM C-7 will load data of attitude, speed and location white is a lie that the small internal radar AIM-120-C 7 detects a type of aircraft SU-30MK2 120km the Royar Air Force in tests found that with older aircraft with discontinued systems is effective but against aircraft that have advanced systems that can detect AIM-120-C-7 to time it loses effectiveness so they deciding to use the option of transmitting contantes data to the missile AIM-120-C-7 has a GPS system the BVR far-reaching Venezuela is the R-27er 130km missile launcher constantly receives data plane which gives a greater chance of success. Although this is a missile with a semi-radar missiles activoTambién SARH are very deadly in narrower ranges (R-27 vs R-77, Sparrow vs. AMRAAM). The reason for this is that the radar fighter emits far more energy than the radar seeker missile While in the wing, the missile seeker SARH closed much faster than the missile seeker ARH going to take a bit of latency " looking for "the goal before it gets a lock on the SARH missile, on the other hand, it can be" snap "shot Once fired, the missile SARH not reveal its position RWR the target, because it is completely passive. RWR target only tell where the direction of the radiant fighter and how close the radar fighter who is radiographed target This means that you do not know how to evade the incoming missile. The ARH missile could alert the RWR when going active and where it comes from, allowing the object of an evasive maneuver Sukhoi-30MK2 has the IRST / LASER OEPS-27 is a system for detecting and tracking aerial targets with IR up to 90 km and a laser rangefinder for light air and ground targets to aim the cannon, bombs and missiles The F16 BLOCK 50 PEACE PUMA lacks this type of own system IRST / LASER OEPS-27 tests in Russia could detect an albatross 30km it is also effective for detecting BVR BVR missiles since the time of shooting to generate a large kinetic force. Supposedly The R-73 ESIGNATION NATO AA-11 Archer is better than the AIM-9 because the R-73 has a system that can make the difference between a flare and a nozzle here the explanation of an already old program aces future military combat experts of the United States give the eye no explanation to say they are Russians.

Interesting info: (RLPK-27VEP) N001VEP is the improved SU-30MKK N001VE having a range of 250km the N001VEP (RLPK-27VEP) has a range of 300km can detect 10 targets to attack at 4 targets simultaneously tracks at an angle of 120 degrees in Venezuela has detected an F-16A Block 15 160km and another SU-30 200km. The radar looks down and up systems with anti-jamming features. In contrast to the upcoming Eurofighter Typhoon module, the Su 30MKI N011M Bars radar would be the right one. On 21 July 2015, India and UK began the bilateral exercise named Indradhanush with aircraft operating from three Royal Air Force bases. The exercises included both Beyond Visual Range (BVR) and Within Visual Range (WVR) exercises between the Su-30MKI and Eurofighter Typhoon. Indian media reported the results were in favour of the IAF with a score of 12-0 at WVR engagements. They also claim that the IAF Su-30MKIs held an edge over the Typhoons in BVR engagements though not in as dominating a manner. The RAF issued a statement that the results being reported by the Indian media did not reflect the results of the exercise.[86] According to Aviation International News In close combat, thrust vector control on the Flankers more than compensated for the greater thrust-to-weight ratio of the Typhoon. Another question about Eurofighter Typhoon... Against AIM 54 and Meteor missiles, the RVV BD would be the solution. When Meteor missile enters DCS World, F 16 and F 18 pilots will cry! Test firing of the Russian R-37M hypersonic air-to-air missile (also known as RVV-BD) from the Su-35 fighter jets are planned for end-2020 while flight tests to confirm compatibility with the Su-35 have already commenced. The R-37M is intended to be the main long-range air-to-air weapon for current and future Su and MiG type Russian fighter jets well into the next decade. It is intended to replace the R-77 missiles whose maximum range is around 100 km at supersonic speeds (2-3 times the speed of sound) compared to the R-37M’s 200 km at hypersonic speeds (six times the speed of sound). The missile will compete with the Raytheon-made AIM-120C (160 plus km range), the AIM-260 JATM (200 km plus range) being developed by Lockheed Martin and MBDA’s Meteor (160 km range with 60 km ‘no-escape-zone’) that is among the weapons for the Rafale, Gripen and F-35 jets . Though the missile is claimed to have a 200 km range, the ideal targeting distance (also known as no-escape-zone) depends upon the type of enemy aircraft; for fighter jets it is 40–70 km, for stealth aircraft or cruise missiles, this distance would be less, for large bombers or early warning aircraft, the effective firing distance could be greater than 70 km-100km. The missile is able to take advantage of its hypersonic speed at relatively shorter targeting distance and hit enemy aircraft equipped with the most sophisticated missile detection systems. Sorry bad english! :)