treg12

... and the other issue in my opinion is the incorrect redback of system failures ... in that case: no landing gear unknown/unsafe condition, when patially collapsed or ripped of ... --> black/white or red/white stripes shoult appear (see pic ... made from F4 manual) and I´m pretty shure, that with landing gear completely ripped of, some sort of hydraulic problem will appear best regards

yes, thanks for reply, ... it seems to me that this sub panels direct lighting (means bulbs inside instruments; light is controlled by console lights knob) is only illuminated indirectly via side panel flood lights (thats the main issue to me ... maybe intensionally made that way, or too difficult to simulate ?)... not from inside ... the pic I already posted is one of an real life sub panel. --> would be good to have this kind of internal lighting of these instruments (it´s very dark in that corner ) at night/sunset condition the gauges are low to medium-ok visible ... at daytime very poor, even with direct lighting (console lights knob) at max lumina. see also attached pics (one at day time - no lights/ one at day time max lighting (no floods)/ one at sunset max lighting (no floods))

it seems like the new Jester UI stuff is too much work load for that simulation (Jester seems less confused in more simple situations) ... want F14 Jester back ... "lock enemy ahead" > "yes sir"/done ... "lock friend ahead" > "yes sir"/done ... simple key bindings. Mr. "no, can´t comply" is nearly useless in A-A w/ Sparrows. Sometimes it works fine, mostly not. (hope the F4 Jester stays out of the F14 cockpit)

maybe fixed with upcoming patch ? ... uncool, fisseling arround with the hand lamp hope so, best rgds

... yes, so that is how my F4 could have looked after ramming 5 - 10 more migs out of the sky ... glad to see that the damage model is not inactive

hi all, i did not try these training missions but tried to put the F4 into a super carrier mission ... game crashed .. until i un-coupled the interaction with the carrier module ... just placed the F4 somewhere on the map .. done so, the mission didn´t crash anymore. .... even carrier landing & start (no catapult offcourse) possible. maybe this is helpful (would think, rootcause maybe interaction w/ stuff in the map). best rgds

you mean something like that ... --> YT (there are some vids ... i dont use it, so i´ve no idea by myself)

Magn. Compass R/C deviates approx. 105° ... A/C repair already tried ... as well as mission restart. (F/C Mag Comp, F/C HSI, R/C HSI is matching ... only R/C Mag Comp. deviation arround 100 deg.) ... as far as I know, it can happen in real, but mainenance should compensate it via HW setting (possible in game?)

photorealisic Graphics is great ... bloody good work, .. like on the F14. Hoping the damage model will get some improvement ... killed a fishbed by disassembling its tail, one piece after another ... no scratch on the F4 (and no ... i don´t want to see my F4 to explode ... but maybe Radom coming of, Radar Kit damaged ... covers coming of, broken windshield or so on) I already saw a lot of covers came of after explosion (SAM hit) but that was the end of the flight despite this .. good work so far, keep it up HB regards

Jester failes to focus and lock TGT right in front (even within 25 miles), also unable to switch back from 5 miles zu whatever range (no TGTs noticed/focused/locked) by Jester whether via radial Jester Menu nore Context Menu ... despite the fact that vocal/audio calls has been made continiuosly by Jester "hostile in front ... bla bla .. whatever") ... so using AIM7/Rdr msl is some sort of gambling p.s.: would be nice to have the content of the radial menu all in the old style side text menu (instead of whirling around in the radial)

Undercarriage Indicators --> no UNKNOWN POS. readback with collapsed or partially coll. Landing Gear also no Hydr. Pressure Loss in both Sys. when Landing Gear ripped of ? Instrument Lighting Front Cockpit/Front-left Sub Panel (Flaps/Slats/Gears(Undercarr.)) --> seems to stay OFF (i´m not shure if these are internally illuminated (no schematics) ... but think they should -> pic .... (even with all Instr. Lights ON/Bright > nothing) [with 5 pins an internal lighting schould be implemented]

sorry i´m probably slow ... help me to learn

.... so it means, you love to get scamed, ... these programmers are professionals as well the companies are they are working for ... the more people like to get scamed the more is the system turning into that what we can see right here. ivo is absolutely right a properly working high fidelity model like the HB F4 (dev environment) for a NOT ready environment (ED/DCS) is worthless and should be delayed ... AGREED ... BUT they should test & state this BEFORE final release date (AND communicate with each other BEFORE) ... customers ($$) have the right to be pissed off

u r so right, next time I will check this 1st

... and i have better things to do than to studying update news ... right at that time i had a lack of information ... in short: F4 release date/time > now > purchased module ??? where is it & whats goin on ... had to search/google/check for information ... pain in the ass - routine to do so >> better: short information on DCSs news pop up window (and YES it already exists in the DCS GUI)

yes, i got that, but was not expecting a DCS patch combined with HBs F4 release date (thougt it has been checked/tested before) ... a short note on the DCS GUIs news pop up window would have been very helpful (for all the people that already gave money und now wondering why the module manager is not showing any F4) ... for the patch status news stuff you have to search (your pic shows a forum content)

... despite all this ... absolutely poor communication (DCS) ... had to search forums/YT for quick answers, on DCS main page no note/news ... just missing the ordered module

... what I don´t get is why a DCS patch has to be enrolled excactly at the release date of an 3rd party product ... the f4 II was already airborne for few people in special early access without issues (maybe not the 100% product... weapons, multiplayer readiness .. whatever) ... we will see ... or 24 months after release