Jump to content

Notarobot

Members
  • Posts

    51
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Notarobot

  1. 10 minutes ago, SharpeXB said:

    Are you using DSR to downsample and then DLSS to upscale? Seems counterproductive. 

    Exactly, and it works wonders. 
    Without dlss, even my 4090 can't just render new games at 5100x2000 resolution with ray tracing and all the bells and whistles. 

    The thing that makes the picture so good is actually the DSR. (downscaling from 5100x2000 to 3440x1440)
    DLSS and framegen just make it possible. 

    Try it man. Enable DSR factors in nvidia control panel. I would only choose the "DL" ones. 
    Compare DSR 5100x2000 (or whatever "higher than native" options you have with your specific monitor) .... with native. 

    You'll be shocked. 

    null

    image.png

  2. 1 hour ago, Nightdare said:

     

    But frame gen won't make low performance systems better

    It's already been stated, that you need reasonable quality to have an 'improvement'

    You can't polish a turd with MFG, you'll just get 3 AI added turds

     

     

    But you're not getting 120 FPS with Frame gen, you're getting 50% AI mutated copies of the actual FPS

    And may I remind you that DLSS isn't supersampling but DOWNsampling? so that 5100x2100 won't even be the real possible resolution

    So you're basically gimping your bragging rights, you bought a Pro monitor that isn't running at it's max res, and a pro card that isn't giving you even actual FPS

    "Yeah I'm running at 5100x2100 actually 3150x 1570 and 120 FPS actually 50"

    It's a 1440P monitor , ultrawide. 
    Render resolution is 3440x1440. 
    DLSS makes that into 5100x2000
    And then, that huge picture gets downscaled into my 32 inch ultrawide. 
    And you won't believe your eyes it looks so good. 

    All this with every single option to maxed @ 120 fps. 

    Now, i could also just render at native resolution and leave frame gen and DLSS off.
    You know, out of "principle", or maybe just because i'm being a stubborn narrow minded parrot who can't get off the 'fake frames' bandwagon, but i would be shooting myself in the foot and missing out big time. 

    Because like i said, it looks like absolute dog**** compared to enabling DLSS + DSR. 

    You talk about 'real' and 'fake' ... you know you're staring at a screen right? It's just pixels man. If the 'fake' thing runs and looks literally twice as good ... who gives a crap 🙂 

    Stop hating man, get on board you're not stopping this progress. You're just missing out. 

     

  3. Framegen IS awesome and it will become much more awesome in the future. 
    Without framegeneration and DLSS this (5100x2100 resolution) with all bells and whistles on at 120 fps and SMOOTH would be impossible for the next 15 years: (not to mention you'd need a dieselmotor powering your computer)
    edit* ok it looks terrible in this picture but the original is 5 MB and i shrunk it down with copy past to 400 kb  😄  (but it looks AMAZING in full glory trust me) 
    Here is original

     

     

    Stalker 2.bmp

    • Like 1
  4. 7 hours ago, Nightdare said:

     

    instead of a real woman, you'd rather watch an OF vid?

     

    Instead of putting in tech that increased the actual performance, so you aren't running RT titles at 15 fps, they sacrificed that real estate on the card for their new toy and conning you into believing the card performs better

     

     

    Ok first that analogy makes 0 sense. Also it really depends on the woman i guess 
    If the real woman is 85 years old and extremely unattractive, (15 fps), then yeah i'd rather look at the onlyfans page (120 fps)  😛

    But seriously, we're all disappointed by the non FG performance of the 50 series card. 

    However, just tossing every new technology away saying it's 'fake' boohoo is a bit short sighted. 
    You realize that DLSS is filling in frames as well right? 
    You understand that VR is full of 'fake frames' right, like all the time? 
    Or do you  turn off smoothing out of principle because you'd rather look at a 'real woman' ? :d I doubt it. 

    Frame generation and DLSS are here to stay. And i turn all of them on when playing whatever single player game i'm playing for a much, MUCH smoother and more enjoyable experience. 
    Maybe if i'm playing counter strike and i actually need those few milliseconds of less latency i'd turn it off but DCS is not one of those games. DCS is slow as hell and a few milliseconds of latency don't do anything to the gameplay. 

    A smooth experience without hickups and nauseating low framerates does. 

    nvidia fcked up with their "5080 = 4090 performance for 500 dollars" but that doesn't mean these new technologies have no place at all, especially moving forward 

     

    • Like 2
  5. Good lord. 
    So download speed is good now. So good it eats all my 200 Mbit internet. 
    That is excellent. 

    However, while downloading i can't do much internet related, so i though if i click 'cancel' , surely it won't throw away all the gigs i have been downloading for hours. 

    Except, it does? There's no 'pause'? Please build a pause 

  6. crap, i also have a dead pixel right in the middle. I just noticed it. 
    It's a tiny black square. I wouldn't even bother if it was anywhere else but it's right on the nose 😞
    Taking out lens tomorrow, pray for a dust particle. If it's not,  decide whether i can live with it or not  :d 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...