Divide Et Impera
-
Posts
138 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Divide Et Impera
-
-
I find it very interesting when arguments are presented as to the lack of a WWII environment, taking into account that the Mustang was only operationally involved in WWII for a year or so and even less in some theatres of WWII.
What about Korea?
3 years of war there and no mention of lack of a DCS Korean environment for the Mustang......
Why would that be?
I would be prodding for a Korean environment, especially so if I was to attempt to sway modders' talents in a specific direction. Then again, that's just me.
Agree. Plus, Korea would allow modern jets for future modules. it would be awesome.. with beautiful korean war paint schemes.
But no technical changes for the korean war with P51 ? or F51 ? since WW2
-
I'd rather wish the next module announcement as christmas present
-
+1 kosovo/south italy/greece
-
Couldnt' they just make à SDK for 3D models ?
-
Balkans would be epic. Although I'm not convinced any of the community terrain projects will ever see the light of day.
Didn't the Nevada map started like this ?
-
Have you tried the training missions ? There's one specific for HOTAS . And you only have 3 triggers : one for stabilisation on where you aim with the cannon another to shoot with the cannon and a third one to release a weapon wich is under the wings. And for the china hat forward long for example is it really that hard to understant that you just have to map the china hat forward with a button on your stick and then , push it .. Long ? As it says ..
-
-
-
:doh:
( but i think there's already a thread for this in input output part of the forum )
-
Pleaaaaaase anything Multi-role
-
I always wonder why there was à 10 here wich never change . Hope it'll be included in à hotfix
-
Why the hurry?
Ok this is an normal answer. No hurry dont worry :) just wanted to know. If it has been reported i'll wait patiently
-
All can i say is LOL . You make wrong models ( dont tell me its minor its just not thé same plane ) and then you just say STFU politly to people who pay ED . Thats WAY More important than other fixes you did sorry. But i lost my Time here argumenting with replies like yours
-
Anything new / hotfix in perspective ?
-
After the new patch I lost all in cockpit sounds of switches... I uninstalled and installed the game again without the patch, full installation, and still same problem... wtf?
Its not à bug . Imagine the sound of engines plus wear a helmet
-
"fast" fixed wing jets ? :D kidding ( or not )
-
How its possible to Max the LOD of the units ? Because its really annoying that they dissapear , can't they just stay visible but very very small ?
-
Ctrl+Z increases time compression, Shift+Z resets it to 1x, Alt+Z reduces it.
I think. It's definitely those keys but I'm only 99% sure I got their functions right.
For ALL the french users who read this : don't do that in flight
You know the difference between QWERTY keyboards and AZERTY keyboards . So in the AZERTY ones : CTRL + Z = Jettison all weapons. Its quite annoying when flying since 20 mins and " oh shit lets speed this up ... oh goood "
I think it MAY be Ctrl + W you see what i mean , but NOT Ctrl + Z :megalol:
-
Been doing more research today on the sniper and suite 3....based on the converstations I had today with specs and weapon troops (that worked suite 3 jets). The sniper pod could be carried on a suite 3 jet, the reason it wasn't (primarily) was the limited number of sniper pods at the time. Initially sniper pod prority was given to other ACFT and not the A-10, that's why initially we carried the Litening pod exclusivly.
So I stand corrected, it could carry the pod, but like I said just because it can doesn't mean it did.
:thumbup: Nice from you to do those reasearch. My point here is to say " if THIS model could have carried THIS pod , it'll be interesting to add it " .
Its like saying " no a10C has ever flown over georgia " yes its true but it COULD have been possible , and i think nobody have problems with it
Thats exactly the same argument, but i understand thats a bit of work . But for that i could pay ( not 19,99$ :D ) some dollars to get it : because i find it a real PLUS to this sim and i'll love this psychology of improving in the right senses <- part for all of the moderators who think i want to kill the outcome of ED :thumbup:
-
What is this "CBU style" bomb you got on central right pylon ?
-
You really like to moan don't you.
Nate
Eh, don't Forget i'm French ;) . I prefer moaning too much than too less
-
Totally agree with you . You should make à poll on thé front page :)
-
Dogfight in MP with other people...a lot better than fighting AI anyways...
I think that dogfighting p51 vs p51 Will be very fun .. 5/6 Times ? But make à payware for this ?? Its completly un realistic . If they add other planes and à Europe or pacific or etc map i'm in .
But définitly you 'll havé to pay me to dogfight like this hours above Georgia or Nevada. Without me Again . As BS2 as JTAC . But impatient for Nevada and next module : those are interesting
-
why would you put A10s and a WWII figher in the same mission?..
however, if it was WWII figher vs WWII figher in DCS environement (Crimea or Nevada or wherever), sign me up!....especially if it is the first of a new line of classic Addons.
Ultimately, ED gives us the tools, but WE create the scenario in the mission editor..
Totally agree with you : There is not any interest to implement only the airplane in DCS itself but if there is other WWII warbirds , etc etc , Hell Yeah i'm for it too. But it seems a bit boring with your P51 alone with no one to fight ... But if there's things to do i'm for it
Is DCS BS1 and WH compatible with DCS World?
in DCS World 1.x (read only)
Posted
How did you do it ? Its quite hard to find a clear explanation on this