Jump to content

Roadrunner

Members
  • Posts

    979
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Roadrunner

  1. kann sein, dass ich es überlese, aber folgendes wäre wissenswert:

     

    - VR oder bildschirm

    - falls nur bildschirm, welche auflösung ist das ziel?

     

    ich selbst fahre 1080er auflösung, und habe 45+ FPS mit almost max settings mit 16GB DDR4 3200er, GTX1060 6GB und einem Ryzen 5 3600, DCS auf M2 SSD. mehr power ist sicherlich immer besser :D würde ich eine höhere auflösung nutzen, würde es eng werden, aber genau deswegen auch die fragen oben.

  2. This may be more outside the scope here, but some way to capture and end-of-mission state and import that into a following campaign mission. Less asking for dynamic campaign, but allowing for continuity between a set of missions.

     

     

    totaly forgot this, that indeed would be realy great stuff.

     

     

    +1 request

  3. 1: Place AC anywhere, like Helos and Harrier, maybe only for client/player AC, as the AI cannot handle this atm.

     

    2: FARP zone instead of FARP object

     

    3: visible client AC before anyone joins a slot, if player leaves spawn AC back on startposition if not occupied by another player who parked there. makes airfields more believeable

     

    4: a set of static objects without collision model, namely taxiway lines of different shape and size, so we can place them on airfields when placing ACs like in my point 1 above.

     

    5: signs where you can enter numbers / letters, ie "F103" to mark parking positions.

  4. Has been mentioned in another topic somewhere, but for me, the E-2D would be a great addition for MP (SP functionalities would be a different beast there if you cant talk to folks).

     

    I would love to take off from the carrier ahead of most others, get to altitude, set my autopilot and then jump into the back to do AWACS coms, maybe mission commander role or whatever, and after the other players are home get back to the boat.

     

     

    Maybe some day, but sadly i guess it would be a toooo specialised airframe to generate much income.

     

    RR

  5. 1) if you want to choose there, the x56 would be better with 2 throttles. for all hotas systems, you should read reviews, as especialy with the saiteks there has been some quality problems (madcatz).

     

    2) take the hornet, its easy to fly and learn as long as you dont touch the weapons and other more complex systems, just learn rampstart, takeoff, airfield pattern, landing, some navigation first ;)

     

     

    just a personal opinion though, have fun ;)

×
×
  • Create New...