Terminal,
Hey bud. From what I've read on the forums, there isn't much of an FPS penalty going from one monitor to two or three, especially when using an ATI-based card. I imagine NVidia shouldn't be hit that hard, especially if you're going to be getting one of the new 600 series cards.
But to the Esteemed DCS Board Members, am I correct in saying that the GPU has to wait until the CPU draws the picture? (I think you all know where this is headed). :cry:
As you know, I run a slightly-overclocked (factory) GTX590. As noted on many FPS-comparison analysis threads, differences in FPS between running this GPU and others, including comparable ATI and NVidia offerings (580,570,560ti, etc..) using similar CPU clock frequencies are relatively the same. So...what does that tell us? :cry: :cry:
True...the lure of the latest GPU is most enticing. And I'm sure you will pick up a few FPS as a result. But...so long as the CPU market remains status quo as to clock frequencies, and assuming no change in sim source code, you may be disappointed with your new purchase. I'd wait a bit. :)
CS