Jump to content

Hans-Joachim Marseille

Members
  • Posts

    741
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hans-Joachim Marseille

  1. Don't we already have this skin as default?
    One of the Sachsenberg Schwarm / Galland Circus / JV.44 squadron skins already existed in DCS, but that skin has the wrong number (10, should be 1).

    The more the merrier, so we can play Me.262 escort in MP later on. By the way, thanks a lot for your engine mod ... it's brutal!

  2. I have their T-rudder and it will probably outlive me ... it's build like a Russian tank! I previously had Simped F-16 rudder pedals.

    The packaging was top notch; the cardboard box it came in seems custom printed and mentions "Rudder".

    I only had to slightly re-cut a pedal thread (too much coating on the thread?).

    They included a nicely packaged (tin box) trigger of their upcoming KG-12 grip.

    It's true their Black Mamba grip is in fact the grip of the cheaper Cobra.

    After the hassle I went through with TM flightsticks, my next flightstick will definitely be of VKB.

    I've had very good response from Eduard through vkb@flightsimcontrols.com.

    They don't produce in large quantities and the fact that they sold all their Black Mamba's within a short time speaks for itself.

    VKB for me are a highly recommended group of Russian engineers.

  3. If I remember correctly this ac was taken at Regensburg and was a hotrod. Have to search where I read about "Papageienschwarm". The name was not used during the war ("parrot squadron") but i think many of you know that story.
    Wasn't it at Ainring (Salzburg) that this plane, Oblt. Klaus Faber's, fell into enemy's hands together with Hptm. Waldemar Wübke's "Red 3"?

    And that on May 3, 1945, Faver shot down a P-47 near Bad Aibling with "Red 13"? The checkerboard means headquarters, the red circle around it protection (unit). "Red 13" was rumored to fly exceptionally fast at low level. It's great to see the "Papageienstaffel" (: parrot squadron) come alive.

    I would applaud addition of "Red 3" and "Red 4" as well as a correction of "Red 1" to complete the Staffel for Me.262 support duty, but understand Mainstay will be very busy for a while with the MiG-21Bis (as he should) ;)

    Thanks for this wonderful addition though Mainstay!

     

    ROT13Original.jpg

     

    product1e.jpg

     

    AINRING-bw.jpg

     

    Ainringplan.jpg

     

    Themembers.jpg

     

    Left to right: Lt. Heinz Sachsenberg "Red 1", Hptm. Waldemar Wübke "Red 3", Oblt. Klaus Faber "Red 13", Lt. Karl-Heinz Hoffmann "Red 4".

     

    Fabber.jpg

     

    (source: Jerry Crandall's "Doras of the Galland Circus")

  4. Hope i can please more people by making skins etc :thumbup:
    Can I request a JV44 "Galland Circus" skin, to accompany the already existing (but incorrectly numbered) one in DCS?

    These were the protection squad for the Me.262, so will be useful when DCS: Me.262 is released.

    I personally love no. 13's tongue-in-cheek slogan ("It must go in, even if we both cry") :D

     

    Pic-Rote13-01.jpg

     

    EC7214d.jpg

  5. A T-34 is useless, if we talking about ground units for the Normandy Map! We need some stuff, like in the Iron Front: Liberation 1944 - D-Day DLC!
    Not really, "Das Reich" used some captured T-34s as "Bergepanzer" (: utility and recovery vehicle) in Normandy.

    I wrote "incorporate such a game into DCS" with respect to "T-34 vs. Tiger".

     

    This Tiger I was presented on Kickstarter in October 2013 (AI).

     

    cfeb9aa2d815c036b30a890d8a23d189_large.jpg?1381521685

     

    In the upcoming movie "Fury", a real WWII Tiger I will be featured. It belongs to the tank museum in Bovington.

     

  6. Saying that you don't like the layout of the cockpit or something like that is OK, but saying that French aircrafts could fall off the sky at any moment based on what you could have experienced is just not right and honest.
    Don't put words in my mouth; my statement is that I doubt the overall quality of Airbus, not that a plane can fall out of the sky at any moment.

    You don't like my comments about French work ethics (based on my very own work experience with French engineers)? Tough.

    As for mentioning AF447; it's showcasing Airbus' lack of (tactile) feedback to the controls. I don't like the fingerpointing to the pilots that took place.

    I would also like to mention QF72. These accidents don't give me confidence. These are not old planes.

     

    • Like 1
  7. Of course you'd want a Tiger II. But you'd only be allowed 1 for every 30 T34s of course, and I'd take a JS3 - just for balance, naturally!

    Not really, 800 litres for 100 km through rough terrain is hardly fuel efficient.

    The guy at the museum told me they didn't run well on American fuel ... it couldn't run uphill on that fuel lol.

    So much for capturing Allied fuel depots as a strategic source of refueling during the battle of the Bulge.

    Though it could really pack a punch and was virtually indistructable from the front, this one was damaged after facing 15 Shermans with it's sister tank. The barrel was severed by their fire.

  8. It's really tough to generalize saying french spend their time at work actually not working ...
    For me there is a difference between working (putting your hours in) and getting the job done.

    Like mentioned, I'm missing ownership and drive (commitment) from most of the French engineers I know (with some exceptions in line and higher management).

     

    I did see French spent an inordinate amount of time and effort on safety awareness though. That's a good point.

     

    After the AF447 disaster they replaced the pitot tubes, so I'm finding it hard to believe it was just pilot error.

     

    I'm sure not all is bad, but it's the bad impressions that stay with you.

  9. Please tell me more about how bad is our work. I'm interested in your arguments.
    It's no secret that French (semiconductor) industry is heavily subsidized by the government and the European Union.

    French workers start their week shaking hands and kissing colleagues until 10AM, then engage in meetings until noon, then a 1- to 2-hour lunch ...

    Then start some work in the afternoon, if the company gates are not barred upon return from lunch due to organized labour organisation strikes (I've experienced this several times).

     

    One of my American colleagues was called by the French work's council because he worked "too much" (over 40 hrs/wk).

    After they found out he is not working for a French company they quickly dropped the argument.

     

    We have to fly our engineers over for weekend support because our French colleagues have worked their 40 hrs/wk and are not allowed to work any more.

    They also like to use that argument now. When push comes to shove (difficult work ahead) we are also requested to send our engineers over, simply because they can get the job done.

    There is no taking ownership or showing commitment ... that's what I mean with bad work ethics.

     

    It's no wonder French cars have the highest breakdown rate of all for bad electronics.

    There is a joke around here that French cars have the most comfortable seats ... sure, you need them when your car breaks down.

     

    Don't get me wrong, I really like the French "joie de vivre". And to the rescue; one of our teams in former east Germany has the same work ethics.

    But I think in general France doesn't fit in the hightech industry with this kind of work ethics ... exceptions permitted of course.

     

    http://www.ukessays.com/essays/cultural-studies/airbus-case-study.php

     

    With this kind of extreme safety level product, I'm not in favour of any multi-cultural experimenting in one company.

  10. Yes, because nothing Boeing made ever crashed due to manufacturing or design defect.... :rolleyes:
    Sure, Boeing has it's design flaws too. I'll put it more bluntly then; I'd rather not fly in anything French, knowing French work ethics first-hand (semiconductor industry).
×
×
  • Create New...