Lieuwe

Well note the emoticon ofcourse, the system modeling is not that great compared to the real thing I gather from a few people who can know. But flying it is fun and IFR navigation is IFR navigation regardless if the radar tracking modes for Air to Air targets are correct. Besides, with the TAC Pack thing from the VRS Super Hornet people hopefully getting added to more aircraft like the F-16 it would add another element to it that will be good to see.

Mwoah, at the moment I get as much fun out flying navigation trips in the F-16 in FSX as I get from blowing stuff up in DCS with the A-10C. The current campaign system just doesn't float my boat at all so I don't really see the point in blowing stuff up. Besides, most fighter pilots make 99,99% of the flying hours in peace time, I know a lot of fighter pilots that had entire carreers and that never dropped a bomb in anger. What I am doing in FSX is actually way more realistic ;)

Well there is not just a viable business case for third party developers but also for ED themselves. Sure a DC costs money to develop but it also adds value to not just future Modules but also to modules already on the market. Like I said before I wouldn´t mind paying for a module that contains JUST the DC and it would get me to buy more future modules. At the moment I don´t think I will buy any future modules mainly because I don´t see the point of investing time to learn how to operate a aircraft if I am only going to be able to operate it in a campaign engine that looks and feels of 2001 vintage.

Right, spoken like someone with very little time in the Falcon 4 campaign engine. Even though the F-16 is my favorite modern fighter the only reason I occasionally try FreeFalcon, only to find out it is still a unplayable bug ridden disaster, is for the campaign engine. If I had just wanted to fly the F-16C around I can load up FSX with the Aerosoft F-16 addon and fly it to my hearts content. Would all these variations of Falcon, OpenFalcon, FreeFalcon, Allied Force, BenchMarkSims, exist if people JUST want to fly the F-16? Ofcourse not, it's for the campaign engine.

But that's where I get bored, their just isolated missions. I won't say I have completely and totally mastered the A-10C but I can fly, navigate and blow stuff up and survive most of the time.

I think the DCS series needs more gameplay too, after you master the plane then what are you supposed to do?

I wouldn't mind paying for a module that consisted just out of a Dynamic Campaign. I am find the lack of one is seriously hampering my motivation to get into this series seriously though I did buy two copies of DCS A-10C, one for a buddy of mine. For me even the mediocre DC in IL-2 has more interest at the moment.

Exactly, as nice as FC2 is I grew tired of the missions quickly. A Falcon4 style campaign engine would add life to this series, if we keep having the same campaigns, that I find very uninteresting, I might buy the A-10 module out of curiousity but would probably not buy anything further like a possible F-16 module.

I'd like DCS:Airwar a module that introduces a Falcon4 style campaign engine :) If after that they make a F-16 module I would be in flightsim heaven!

I tried that but it didnt turn up much usefull things, mainly very small JPG's and prints that are so obviously wrong it hurts :)

Hi! I am currently working on a F-16C profile drawing What I am looking for is a good side drawing of Mk 82/84 and or JDAM/LGB versions of these bombs. I was hoping one of you guys could help me out?